linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 8/14 v3] PCI/ACPI: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*()
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:27:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gDwtZ+oYSrj_Ta56QPSeW3OSq4XHkiubOHr4xki7muPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200713175529.29715-4-refactormyself@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 6:55 PM Saheed O. Bolarinwa
<refactormyself@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
>
> On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter,
> val to 0.
> However, with Patch 14/14, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on
> failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x).
>
> This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_word
> is checked to confirm success.
>
> Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_word() to ensure success.
>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index 7224b1e5f2a8..39eb816bc3b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -248,12 +248,13 @@ static bool pcie_root_rcb_set(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>         struct pci_dev *rp = pcie_find_root_port(dev);
>         u16 lnkctl;
> +       int ret;
>
>         if (!rp)
>                 return false;
>
> -       pcie_capability_read_word(rp, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &lnkctl);
> -       if (lnkctl & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RCB)
> +       ret = pcie_capability_read_word(rp, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &lnkctl);
> +       if (!ret && (lnkctl & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RCB))
>                 return true;
>
>         return false;
> @@ -792,12 +793,13 @@ bool pciehp_is_native(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>  {
>         const struct pci_host_bridge *host;
>         u32 slot_cap;
> +       int ret;
>
>         if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
>                 return false;
>
> -       pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, &slot_cap);
> -       if (!(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC))
> +       ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, &slot_cap);
> +       if (ret || !(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC))
>                 return false;
>
>         if (pcie_ports_native)
> --
> 2.18.2
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-14 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-13 17:55 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 1/14 v3] IB/hfi1: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-13 17:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 3/14 v3] ath9k: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-20 17:09   ` Kalle Valo
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 4/14 v3] iwlegacy: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-15 16:47   ` Kalle Valo
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 8/14 v3] PCI/ACPI: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-14 13:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 12/14 v3] PCI/AER: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0gDwtZ+oYSrj_Ta56QPSeW3OSq4XHkiubOHr4xki7muPw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).