linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Himadri Pandya <himadrispandya@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
	yuehaibing@huawei.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ogiannou@gmail.com, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	petkan@nucleusys.com
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 4/4] net: rndis_host: use usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send()
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:44:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOY-YVnFtDMkRVVg4TZ-3rRxciRYwEQCf-ctbm9=KbF4=1FqMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200923102256.GA3154647@kroah.com>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 3:52 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:35:19PM +0530, Himadri Pandya wrote:
> > The new usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send() nicely wraps
> > usb_control_msg() with proper error check. Hence use the wrappers
> > instead of calling usb_control_msg() directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Himadri Pandya <himadrispandya@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c | 44 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c b/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c
> > index 6fa7a009a24a..30fc4a7183d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c
> > @@ -113,14 +113,13 @@ int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
> >               buf->request_id = (__force __le32) xid;
> >       }
> >       master_ifnum = info->control->cur_altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber;
> > -     retval = usb_control_msg(dev->udev,
> > -             usb_sndctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0),
> > -             USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > -             USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > -             0, master_ifnum,
> > -             buf, le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_len),
> > -             RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > -     if (unlikely(retval < 0 || xid == 0))
> > +     retval = usb_control_msg_send(dev->udev, 0,
> > +                                   USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > +                                   USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > +                                   0, master_ifnum, buf,
> > +                                   le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_len),
> > +                                   RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > +     if (unlikely(xid == 0))
> >               return retval;
> >
> >       /* Some devices don't respond on the control channel until
> > @@ -139,14 +138,11 @@ int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
> >       /* Poll the control channel; the request probably completed immediately */
> >       rsp = le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_type) | RNDIS_MSG_COMPLETION;
> >       for (count = 0; count < 10; count++) {
> > -             memset(buf, 0, CONTROL_BUFFER_SIZE);
> > -             retval = usb_control_msg(dev->udev,
> > -                     usb_rcvctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0),
> > -                     USB_CDC_GET_ENCAPSULATED_RESPONSE,
> > -                     USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > -                     0, master_ifnum,
> > -                     buf, buflen,
> > -                     RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > +             retval = usb_control_msg_recv(dev->udev, 0,
> > +                                           USB_CDC_GET_ENCAPSULATED_RESPONSE,
> > +                                           USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > +                                           0, master_ifnum, buf, buflen,
> > +                                           RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> >               if (likely(retval >= 8)) {
>
> retval here is never going to be positive, right?  So I don't think this
> patch is correct :(
>

Yes :(.

> >                       msg_type = le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_type);
> >                       msg_len = le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_len);
> > @@ -178,17 +174,11 @@ int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
> >                               msg->msg_type = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_MSG_KEEPALIVE_C);
> >                               msg->msg_len = cpu_to_le32(sizeof *msg);
> >                               msg->status = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_STATUS_SUCCESS);
> > -                             retval = usb_control_msg(dev->udev,
> > -                                     usb_sndctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0),
> > -                                     USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > -                                     USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > -                                     0, master_ifnum,
> > -                                     msg, sizeof *msg,
> > -                                     RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > -                             if (unlikely(retval < 0))
> > -                                     dev_dbg(&info->control->dev,
> > -                                             "rndis keepalive err %d\n",
> > -                                             retval);
> > +                             retval = usb_control_msg_send(dev->udev, 0,
> > +                                                           USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > +                                                           USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > +                                                           0, master_ifnum, msg, sizeof(*msg),
> > +                                                           RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
>
> You lost the error message that the previous call had if something went
> wrong.  Don't know if it's really needed, but there's no reason to
> remove it here.
>

The wrapper returns the error so thought that might work instead. But
yes, the old msg is better.

Anyways, this series is dropped :).

Thanks for the review,
Himadri

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-23 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-23  9:05 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 0/4] net: usb: avoid using usb_control_msg() directly Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23  9:05 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 1/4] net: usbnet: use usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send() Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23 10:24   ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 14:08     ` Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23  9:05 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 2/4] net: sierra_net: use usb_control_msg_recv() Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23  9:05 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 3/4] net: usb: rtl8150: use usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send() Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23 10:22   ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-23 14:06     ` Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23 14:20       ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-23 14:32         ` Himadri Pandya
2020-09-24 11:13           ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-25 11:23             ` Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23 14:48     ` Petko Manolov
2020-09-24 11:09       ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-24 15:40         ` Petko Manolov
2020-09-24 16:01           ` Greg KH
2020-09-23  9:05 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 4/4] net: rndis_host: " Himadri Pandya
2020-09-23 10:22   ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 14:14     ` Himadri Pandya [this message]
2020-09-23 10:23 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 0/4] net: usb: avoid using usb_control_msg() directly Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOY-YVnFtDMkRVVg4TZ-3rRxciRYwEQCf-ctbm9=KbF4=1FqMA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=himadrispandya@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ogiannou@gmail.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
    --cc=petkan@nucleusys.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).