From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>,
efault@gmx.de, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
bzolnier@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:27:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204655271.3091.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CD7C05.1080707@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 01:42 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>>> Aiee... device going down after timing out on READ_DISC_INFO. That's
> >>>> gruesome. Can you please try the other patches?
> >>> Tejun, I thought that libata needs a fix for sum(sg) != rq->data_len. No?
> >> The extra_len you added to qc->nbytes should be it. The only other
> >> place to pay attention is the ATAPI transfer chunk size and your patch
> >> seems to get it right.
> >>
> >>> Now Jens' git tree should work with all the non libata stuff, ide,
> >>> firewire, bsg, etc. But I'm not sure about libata.
> >> With the second patch, all others should be fine no matter what. I'll
> >> go check libata part again.
> >
> > I can reproduce the problem here and it's very weird. I'll report back
> > when I know more.
>
> Okay, I got it. Heh, it turns out SCSI and/or block layer is not
> ready for rq->data_len != sum(sg). When adjusted command completes,
> SCSI midlayer completes the command with rq->data_len for PC commands
> which eventually ends up in __end_that_request_first(). As there are
> extra sg area left after completing rq->data_len, blk layer says so to
> SCSI layer and SCSI layer retries the command only with the appended
> area.
>
> The following patch gets the writing going. I really think it's a
> serious mistake to break rq->data_len == sum(sg). If we break
> rq->data_len == requested size, the worst bugs are giving wrong size
> when issuing commands to application layer of devices which is
> relatively easy to spot and not all that command anyway. Breaking
> rq->data_len == sum(sg), bugs will be in internal mechanics, DMA
> engine programming and transport layer. Oh well...
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> index fecba05..32439ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ void scsi_finish_command(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> "Notifying upper driver of completion "
> "(result %x)\n", cmd->result));
>
> - good_bytes = scsi_bufflen(cmd);
> + good_bytes = scsi_bufflen(cmd) + cmd->request->data_len;
This doesn't look right. scsi_bufflen(cmd) is req->data_len for PC
commands ... did you mean to add extra_len here?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-21 8:42 regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke Mike Galbraith
2008-02-22 7:32 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-23 7:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-24 7:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-26 9:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-26 13:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-26 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-27 0:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-27 2:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-27 2:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-27 6:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-27 7:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-28 7:43 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-28 8:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-28 8:50 ` [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling Tejun Heo
2008-02-28 15:35 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-28 15:46 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-29 16:47 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-29 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-01 6:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-01 15:19 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-02 14:52 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-02 18:46 ` Mike Christie
2008-03-03 3:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-03 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 3:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 4:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 6:10 ` [PATCH] block: separate out padding from alignment Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 18:27 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-03 8:26 ` [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 9:21 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 12:17 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 13:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 13:55 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 14:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 14:22 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 14:52 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 22:44 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 2:11 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 2:32 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 8:53 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 8:59 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 9:06 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 9:22 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 9:30 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 9:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 12:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 12:39 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 12:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 12:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 13:03 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 14:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 18:17 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 18:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 18:45 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 18:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 18:54 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 19:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 19:28 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 16:04 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-04 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 17:34 ` walt
2008-03-04 17:59 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 19:42 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-03-04 12:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 12:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 13:30 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 13:50 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 16:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 16:42 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 18:26 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-04 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 18:27 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-03-04 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 18:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 19:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 19:19 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 23:33 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 23:54 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 0:26 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-05 0:44 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 4:56 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-06 5:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 10:16 ` [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completion byte count Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-05 12:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-05 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-05 12:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-05 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-05 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 13:51 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-05 14:08 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 15:21 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-06 4:41 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-06 13:41 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-07 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-07 15:07 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-08 1:06 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-20 12:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-05 14:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-05 15:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 5:02 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 9:29 ` [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1204655271.3091.58.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomof@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).