From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>, Ted Tso <tytso@us.ibm.com>,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
bunk@kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:38:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071213203804.GE25130@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071213170348.GA25981@in.ibm.com>
* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This patchset is an updated version of the preemptible RCU patchset
> that Paul McKenney had posted it in September earlier this year that
> can be found here --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/10/213
>
> This patchset incorporates the review comments from Oleg Nesterov and
> Steven Rostedt.
>
> The testing report of the patchset is as follows:
> ====================================================================
> Patch-stack: 2.6.23-rc3 + cpu-hotplug patches from
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/15/239 + Preempt-RCU
> patches.
> Test: RCU-Torture running parallelly with CPU-Hotplug
> operations.
> Duration: 24 hours.
> Architectures: x86,x86_64, ppc64.
> ====================================================================
>
>
> Currently it is based against the latest linux-2.6-sched-devel.git
>
> Awaiting your feedback!
thanks Gautham, the patchset from you and Paul looks good to me and i've
applied it to sched-devel.git to get it tested and reviewed some more.
from the Nitpicking Police, there are a couple of minor style
problems/warnings with the code, you can see it via:
scripts/checkpatch.pl --file kernel/rcu*.c
nothing serious - RCU is still one of the cleanest subsystems in the
kernel:
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
kernel/rcuclassic.c 0 575 0
kernel/rcupdate.c 1 138 7.2
kernel/rcupreempt.c 0 953 0
kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c 0 330 0
kernel/rcutorture.c 8 995 8.0
the eventual goal would be to match:
scripts/checkpatch.pl --file kernel/sched*.[ch]
output ;-)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-13 17:03 [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] Preempt-RCU: Use softirq instead of tasklets for RCU Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] Preempt-RCU: Reorganize RCU code into rcuclassic.c and rcupdate.c Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-14 14:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2007-12-14 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-12-13 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] Preempt-RCU: Fix rcu_barrier for preemptive environment Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation Gautham R Shenoy
2008-02-29 4:34 ` Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 4:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-29 12:38 ` Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-03-01 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-01 21:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-03-02 3:09 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-02 3:06 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-03 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-04 20:22 ` [PATCH] move PREEMPT_RCU config option back under PREEMPT Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-04 20:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-03-05 0:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-05 2:06 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-05 19:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-04 20:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 13:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-02-29 14:31 ` Roman Zippel
2007-12-13 17:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] Preempt-RCU: CPU Hotplug handling Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:18 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] Preempt-RCU: Update RCU Documentation Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 21:06 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Steven Rostedt
2007-12-13 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-12-13 21:09 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-12-13 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071213203804.GE25130@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).