From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753175AbYJDPZ1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:25:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751079AbYJDPZQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:25:16 -0400 Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:35498 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751057AbYJDPZP (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:25:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:24:56 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Smith , Roland McGrath , Sam Ravnborg , Wenji Huang , Takashi Nishiie Subject: Re: [PATCH] Marker depmod fix core kernel list Message-ID: <20081004152456.GB23398@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Mathieu Desnoyers , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Smith , Roland McGrath , Sam Ravnborg , Wenji Huang , Takashi Nishiie References: <20081003195436.GA13506@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081003195436.GA13506@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 03:54:36PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Here is a fix that should take care if this problem. Given I am not the > modpost expert, let's see if I can get an ACK from Sam. Tested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" It works, thanks!! Can we get this pushed to Linus before 2.6.28 opens? This is technically a regression since it was broken around 2.6.27-rc1. Also, something we need to consider is getting distributions to ship Modules.markers, and where it should be installed. I would argue that it belongs in /lib/modules/`uname -r`, so maybe "make modules_install" should put it there? This attention to deployability is going to be important if markers are to be successfully used by applications such as Systemtap. - Ted