linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, <bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mrp: use stp state as substitute for unimplemented mrp state
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 19:56:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118185618.75h45rjf6qqberic@soft-dev3.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118181319.25419-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>

The 01/18/2021 19:13, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> 

Hi Rasmus,

> When using MRP with hardware that does understand the concept of
> blocked or forwarding ports, but not the full MRP offload, we
> currently fail to tell the hardware what state it should put the port
> in when the ring is closed - resulting in a ring of forwarding ports
> and all the trouble that comes with that.

But why don't you implement the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_MRP_PORT_STATE in your
driver? if already the HW understands the concept of block or forwarding?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
> ---
> 
> I don't really understand why SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_MRP_PORT_STATE even
> has to exist seperately from SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE, and
> it's hard to tell what the difference might be since no kernel code
> implements the former.

The reason was to stay away from STP, because you can't run these two
protocols at the same time. Even though in SW, we reuse port's state.
In our driver(which is not upstreamed), we currently implement
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_MRP_PORT_STATE and just call the
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE.

> 
>  net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c
> index ed547e03ace1..8a1c7953e57a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp_switchdev.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,24 @@ int br_mrp_port_switchdev_set_state(struct net_bridge_port *p,
>         int err;
> 
>         err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> +       if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> +               attr.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE;
> +               switch (state) {
> +               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_DISABLED:
> +               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_NOT_CONNECTED:
> +                       attr.u.stp_state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
> +                       break;
> +               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_BLOCKED:
> +                       attr.u.stp_state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
> +                       break;
> +               case BR_MRP_PORT_STATE_FORWARDING:
> +                       attr.u.stp_state = BR_STATE_FORWARDING;
> +                       break;
> +               default:
> +                       return err;
> +               };
> +               err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> +       }
>         if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>                 br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload MRP state on port %u(%s)\n",
>                         (unsigned int)p->port_no, p->dev->name);
> --
> 2.23.0
> 

-- 
/Horatiu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18 18:13 [PATCH net] net: mrp: use stp state as substitute for unimplemented mrp state Rasmus Villemoes
2021-01-18 18:56 ` Horatiu Vultur [this message]
2021-01-18 19:46   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-18 20:20     ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-01-18 21:27       ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-19  8:32         ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-01-19 15:52           ` Andrew Lunn
2021-01-19 20:59             ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-01-25 21:36             ` Rasmus Villemoes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210118185618.75h45rjf6qqberic@soft-dev3.localdomain \
    --to=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).