linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/16] scripts: kernel-doc: validate kernel-doc markup with the actual names
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:43:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119084328.749e415f@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118133545.05af2277@lwn.net>

Em Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:35:45 -0700
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> escreveu:

> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:04:47 +0100
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Kernel-doc currently expects that the kernel-doc markup to come
> > just before the function/enum/struct/union/typedef prototype.
> > 
> > Yet, if it find things like:
> > 
> > 	/**
> > 	 * refcount_add - add a value to a refcount
> > 	 * @i: the value to add to the refcount
> > 	 * @r: the refcount
> > 	 */
> > 	static inline void __refcount_add(int i, refcount_t *r, int *oldp);
> > 	static inline void refcount_add(int i, refcount_t *r);
> > 
> > Kernel-doc will do the wrong thing:
> > 
> > 	foobar.h:6: warning: Function parameter or member 'oldp' not described in '__refcount_add'
> > 	.. c:function:: void __refcount_add (int i, refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
> > 
> > 	   add a value to a refcount
> > 
> > 	**Parameters**
> > 
> > 	``int i``
> > 	  the value to add to the refcount
> > 
> > 	``refcount_t *r``
> > 	  the refcount
> > 
> > 	``int *oldp``
> > 	  *undescribed*
> > 
> > Basically, it will document "__refcount_add" with the kernel-doc
> > markup for refcount_add.
> > 
> > If both functions have the same arguments, this won't even
> > produce any warning!
> > 
> > Add a logic to check if the kernel-doc identifier matches the actual
> > name of the C function or data structure that will be documented.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>  
> 
> I've applied this one; 

Thanks!

> it seems useful to have even if it creates more
> warnings that Stephen will duly email me about tomorrow...:)  I have parts
> 1-10 set aside and will apply any that don't get picked up directly by the
> maintainers involved.

Yeah, new warnings are unavoidable, as new patches may be introducing
extra issues. Hopefully, the new warning will help people to detect
the issue earlier before submitting upstream.


Thanks,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14  8:04 [PATCH v6 00/16] Fix several bad kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] parport: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] rapidio: fix kernel-doc a markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] fs: fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] pstore/zone: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] firmware: stratix10-svc: fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] connector: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] lib/crc7: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] memblock: fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] w1: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] selftests: kselftest_harness.h: partially fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] scripts: kernel-doc: validate kernel-doc markup with the actual names Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14 10:11   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-14 10:16   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-18 20:35   ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-01-19  7:43     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] net: tip: fix a couple kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14 15:59   ` Jon Maloy
2021-01-14 18:34     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-14 21:22       ` Johannes Berg
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] net: cfg80211: fix a kerneldoc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] reset: core: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:25   ` Philipp Zabel
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] drm: drm_crc: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14  8:06   ` Simon Ser
2021-01-14 14:13     ` Simon Ser
2021-01-14  8:04 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] platform/surface: aggregator: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-14 14:53   ` Maximilian Luz
2021-01-18 18:20   ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] Fix several bad kernel-doc markups Jonathan Corbet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119084328.749e415f@coco.lan \
    --to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).