linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
	Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
	Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] scsi: libsas: Remove in_interrupt() check
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 12:54:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2672812e-91bd-4c60-696d-4000b1914ac6@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7456f628-5e97-42ce-8738-9e661ad2f12a@huawei.com>

On 22/12/2020 12:30, Jason Yan wrote:
>>      return event;
>>
>>
>> So default for phy->ha->event_thres is 32, and I can't imagine that 
> 
> The default value is 1024.

Ah, 32 is the minimum allowed set via sysfs.

> 
>> anyone has ever reconfigured this via sysfs or even required a value 
>> that large. Maybe Jason (cc'ed) knows better. It's an arbitrary value 
>> to say that the PHY is malfunctioning. I do note that there is the 
>> circular path sas_alloc_event() -> sas_notify_phy_event() -> 
>> sas_alloc_event() there also.
>>
>> Anyway, if the 32x event memories were per-allocated, maybe there is a 
>> clean method to manage this memory, which even works in atomic 
>> context, so we could avoid this rework (ignoring the context bugs you 
>> reported for a moment). I do also note that the sas_event_cache size 
>> is not huge.
>>
> 
> Pre-allocated memory is an option.(Which we have tried at the very 
> beginnig by Wang Yijing.)

Right, I remember this, but I think the concern was having a proper 
method to manage this pre-allocated memory then. And same problem now.

> 
> Or directly use GFP_ATOMIC is maybe better than passing flags from lldds.
> 

I think that if we don't really need this, then should not use it.

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-22 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18 20:43 [PATCH 00/11] scsi: libsas: Remove in_interrupt() check Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 01/11] Documentation: scsi: libsas: Remove notify_ha_event() Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-21  9:10   ` John Garry
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 02/11] scsi: libsas: Introduce a _gfp() variant of event notifiers Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] scsi: mvsas: Pass gfp_t flags to libsas " Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] scsi: isci: port: link down: Pass gfp_t flags Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] scsi: isci: port: link up: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 06/11] scsi: isci: port: broadcast change: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] scsi: libsas: Pass gfp_t flags to event notifiers Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] scsi: pm80xx: Pass gfp_t flags to libsas " Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] scsi: aic94xx: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 10/11] scsi: hisi_sas: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] scsi: libsas: event notifiers: Remove non _gfp() variants Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-21 17:17   ` John Garry
2020-12-21 17:38     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-21 10:13 ` [PATCH 00/11] scsi: libsas: Remove in_interrupt() check John Garry
2020-12-22 12:30   ` Jason Yan
2020-12-22 12:54     ` John Garry [this message]
2021-01-11 13:43       ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2021-01-11 13:59         ` John Garry
2021-01-11 14:28           ` Ahmed S. Darwish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2672812e-91bd-4c60-696d-4000b1914ac6@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
    --cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).