From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756957AbYBQErr (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:47:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753261AbYBQErk (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:47:40 -0500 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:27631 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752890AbYBQErj (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:47:39 -0500 Message-ID: <47B7BC4C.8070502@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:47:08 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, Len Brown , sam@ravnborg.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (wakeup) References: <20080216002522.9c4bd0fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080216094844.3e5224f0.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200802170218.08770.rjw@sisk.pl> <47B78C6C.6040905@zytor.com> <20080216181918.3f2a1665.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <47B7B0CE.7000701@zytor.com> <20080216203832.dc34ce5f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <47B7B9AF.2030006@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <47B7B9AF.2030006@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:58:06 -0800 H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >>> Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> Yes, adding -m32 to the X86_32 config ccflags (as is done for the >>>> X86_64 case) makes it build for me. (like patch below) >>>> >>> It's wrong, though, because you can't assume a 32-bit compiler knows >>> about -m32. >>> >>> You need $(call cc-option,-m32). >> >> -cflags-$(CONFIG_X86_32) := >> +cflags-$(CONFIG_X86_32) := $(call cc-option, -m32) >> cflags-$(CONFIG_X86_64) := -m32 > > I think this works for both; that's what we do for arch/x86/boot. OK, that makes sense. I think I'll let Rafael complete it. -- ~Randy