From: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@canonical.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>,
"khalid.elmously@canonical.com" <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Recent raid10 block discard patchset causes filesystem corruption on fstrim
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:43:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fb182e0-a03f-4125-e3db-e9f819e099e4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71b9c9df-93a8-165a-d254-746a874f2238@canonical.com>
On 02/02/2021 11:42 AM, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
> Hi Xiao,
>
> On 24/12/20 11:18 pm, Xiao Ni wrote:> The root cause is found. Now we use a similar way with raid0 to handle discard request
>> for raid10. Because the discard region is very big, we can calculate the start/end address
>> for each disk. Then we can submit the discard request to each disk. But for raid10, it has
>> copies. For near layout, if the discard request doesn't align with chunk size, we calculate
>> a start_disk_offset. Now we only use start_disk_offset for the first disk, but it should be
>> used for the near copies disks too.
> Thanks for finding the root cause and making a patch that corrects the offset
> addresses for multiple disks!
>
>> [ 789.709501] discard bio start : 70968, size : 191176
>> [ 789.709507] first stripe index 69, start disk index 0, start disk offset 70968
>> [ 789.709509] last stripe index 256, end disk index 0, end disk offset 262144
>> [ 789.709511] disk 0, dev start : 70968, dev end : 262144
>> [ 789.709515] disk 1, dev start : 70656, dev end : 262144
>>
>> For example, in this test case, it has 2 near copies. The start_disk_offset for the first disk is 70968.
>> It should use the same offset address for second disk. But it uses the start address of this chunk.
>> It discard more region. The patch in the attachment can fix this problem. It split the region that
>> doesn't align with chunk size.
> Just wondering, what is the current status of the patchset? Is there anything
> that I can do to help?
>
>> There is another problem. The stripe size should be calculated differently for near layout and far layout.
>>
> I can help review the patch and help test the patches anytime. Do you need help
> with making a patch to calculate the stripe size for near and far layouts?
>
> Let me know how you are going with this patchset, and if there is anything I
> can do for you.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew
>
Hi Matthew
I'm doing the test for the new patch set. I'll send the patch soon
again. Thanks for the help.
Regards
Xiao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-03 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 3:46 PROBLEM: Recent raid10 block discard patchset causes filesystem corruption on fstrim Matthew Ruffell
2020-12-09 4:17 ` Song Liu
2020-12-09 22:04 ` Song Liu
2020-12-10 1:35 ` Xiao Ni
2020-12-24 10:18 ` Xiao Ni
2020-12-27 21:57 ` Song Liu
2021-02-02 3:42 ` Matthew Ruffell
2021-02-03 1:43 ` Xiao Ni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fb182e0-a03f-4125-e3db-e9f819e099e4@redhat.com \
--to=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=khalid.elmously@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.ruffell@canonical.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).