linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver core: Remove warning on driver unbinding
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:42:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx-Mp0uKBF_BWFFBUm=eVOp8xhxF3+znFB8vTaFwpJWTnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231110080241.702999-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 12:02 AM Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> During driver unbinding, __device_links_no_driver() can raise the
> following warning:
>    --- 8< ---
>    WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 166 at drivers/base/core.c:1426 __device_links_no_driver+0xac/0xb4
>    ...
>    Call trace:
>    __device_links_no_driver+0xac/0xb4
>    device_links_driver_cleanup+0xa8/0xf0
>    device_release_driver_internal+0x204/0x240
>    device_release_driver+0x18/0x24
>    bus_remove_device+0xcc/0x10c
>    device_del+0x158/0x414
>    platform_device_del.part.0+0x1c/0x88
>    platform_device_unregister+0x24/0x40
>    of_platform_device_destroy+0xfc/0x10c
>    device_for_each_child_reverse+0x64/0xb4
>    devm_of_platform_populate_release+0x4c/0x84
>    release_nodes+0x5c/0x90
>    devres_release_all+0x8c/0xdc
>    device_unbind_cleanup+0x18/0x68
>    device_release_driver_internal+0x20c/0x240
>    device_links_unbind_consumers+0xe0/0x108
>    device_release_driver_internal+0xf0/0x240
>    driver_detach+0x50/0x9c
>    bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc
>    driver_unregister+0x30/0x60
>    ...
>    --- 8< ---
>
> This warning is raised because, during device removal, we unlink a
> consumer while its supplier links.status is DL_DEV_UNBINDING.
> Even if the link is not a SYNC_STATE_ONLY, the warning should not
> appear in that case.
>
> Filter out this warning in case of the supplier driver is unbinding.
>
> Fixes: 8c3e315d4296 ("driver core: Update device link status correctly for SYNC_STATE_ONLY links")

Wrong Fixes tag. I just added the SYNC_STATE_ONLY exception. The issue
has been there since before.

> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 17f2568e0a79..f4b09691998e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -1423,7 +1423,8 @@ static void __device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev)
>                 if (link->supplier->links.status == DL_DEV_DRIVER_BOUND) {
>                         WRITE_ONCE(link->status, DL_STATE_AVAILABLE);
>                 } else {
> -                       WARN_ON(!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY));
> +                       WARN_ON(!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY) &&
> +                               link->supplier->links.status != DL_DEV_UNBINDING);

Don't delete the warning please. Make it better so it doesn't warn
when it shouldn't.

This combined with the other patches you sent make me think this is
more of an issue in the device removal ordering than an actual issue
with the warning. I'm not fully convinced the warning is incorrect
yet.

-Saravana

>                         WRITE_ONCE(link->status, DL_STATE_DORMANT);
>                 }
>         }
> --
> 2.41.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-11  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-10  8:02 [PATCH 1/1] driver core: Remove warning on driver unbinding Herve Codina
2023-11-11  1:42 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2023-11-13 17:57   ` Herve Codina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGETcx-Mp0uKBF_BWFFBUm=eVOp8xhxF3+znFB8vTaFwpJWTnw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).