linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST PATCH v1] driver: core: Make fw_devlink=on more forgiving
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:27:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx9+JbVAX4uXGn5hYSd-1VK8oZeLxhGAKZksyR31xpeQhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com>

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:22 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
>
> This patch is for test purposes only and pretty experimental. Code might
> not be optimized, clean, formatted properly, etc.
>
> Please review it only for functional bugs like locking bugs, wrong
> logic, etc.
>
> It's basically trying to figure out which devices will never probe and
> ignore them. Might not always work.
>
> Marek, Geert, Marc,
>
> Can you please try this patch INSTEAD of the other workarounds we found?

Oh and can you please also try with the CONFIG_MODULES enabled vs
disabled? Or have it disabled but fix the patch so the condition
always evaluates to true.

Thanks,
Saravana

>
> Jon, Michael,
>
> I'm explicitly not including you in the "To" because this patch won't
> work for your issues.
>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/base.h |   3 ++
>  drivers/base/core.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/base/dd.c   |  24 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
> index f5600a83124f..8d5fd95fa147 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/base.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/base.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ struct device_private {
>  #define to_device_private_class(obj)   \
>         container_of(obj, struct device_private, knode_class)
>
> +bool fw_devlink_is_permissive(void);
> +bool fw_devlink_unblock_probe(struct device *dev);
> +
>  /* initialisation functions */
>  extern int devices_init(void);
>  extern int buses_init(void);
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index e61e62b624ce..8528704bbb40 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ early_param("sysfs.deprecated", sysfs_deprecated_setup);
>  static LIST_HEAD(deferred_sync);
>  static unsigned int defer_sync_state_count = 1;
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(fwnode_link_lock);
> -static bool fw_devlink_is_permissive(void);
>
>  /**
>   * fwnode_link_add - Create a link between two fwnode_handles.
> @@ -1481,7 +1480,7 @@ u32 fw_devlink_get_flags(void)
>         return fw_devlink_flags;
>  }
>
> -static bool fw_devlink_is_permissive(void)
> +bool fw_devlink_is_permissive(void)
>  {
>         return fw_devlink_flags == FW_DEVLINK_FLAGS_PERMISSIVE;
>  }
> @@ -1552,6 +1551,120 @@ static int fw_devlink_relax_cycle(struct device *con, void *sup)
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int __device_links_suppliers_available(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct device_link *link;
> +       int ret = 0;
> +
> +       if (dev->fwnode && !list_empty(&dev->fwnode->suppliers) &&
> +           !fw_devlink_is_permissive()) {
> +               return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +       }
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node) {
> +               if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED))
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               if (link->status != DL_STATE_AVAILABLE &&
> +                   !(link->flags & DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY)) {
> +                       ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +bool fw_devlink_unblock_probe(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct fwnode_link *link, *tmp;
> +       struct device_link *dev_link, *dev_ln;
> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev->fwnode;
> +       bool unblocked = false;
> +
> +       if (!fw_devlink_get_flags() || fw_devlink_is_permissive())
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (!fwnode)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&fwnode_link_lock);
> +
> +       /* Delete questionable fwnode links */
> +       list_for_each_entry_safe(link, tmp, &fwnode->suppliers, c_hook) {
> +               struct device *par_dev;
> +               struct fwnode_handle *par;
> +               bool bound;
> +
> +               /*
> +                * Walk up fwnode tree of supplier till we find a parent device
> +                * that has been added or a parent fwnode that has fwnode links
> +                * (this is a firmware node that is expected to be added as a
> +                * device in the future).
> +                */
> +               par = fwnode_get_parent(link->supplier);
> +               while (par && list_empty(&par->suppliers) && !par->dev)
> +                       par = fwnode_get_next_parent(par);
> +
> +               /* Supplier is waiting on parent device to be added. */
> +               if (par && !par->dev) {
> +                       fwnode_handle_put(par);
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +
> +               if (par && par->dev) {
> +                       par_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(fwnode);
> +                       device_lock(par_dev);
> +                       bound = device_is_bound(par_dev);
> +                       device_unlock(par_dev);
> +                       put_device(par_dev);
> +
> +                       /* Supplier is waiting on parent device to be bound. */
> +                       if (!bound)
> +                               continue;
> +               }
> +
> +               /*
> +                * Supplier has no parent or the immediate parent device has
> +                * been bound to a device. It should have been added by now.
> +                * So, this link is spurious. Delete it.
> +                */
> +               dev_info(dev, "Deleting fwnode link to %pfwP\n",
> +                        link->supplier);
> +               list_del(&link->s_hook);
> +               list_del(&link->c_hook);
> +               kfree(link);
> +               unblocked = true;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES))
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       device_links_write_lock();
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry_safe(dev_link, dev_ln, &dev->links.suppliers,
> +                                c_node) {
> +               if (!(dev_link->flags & DL_FLAG_INFERRED) ||
> +                   dev_link->flags & DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY ||
> +                   dev_link->status != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               /* This supplier should have probed by now. */
> +               if (!__device_links_suppliers_available(dev_link->supplier)) {
> +                       dev_info(dev, "Deleting dev link to %s\n",
> +                                dev_name(dev_link->supplier));
> +                       device_link_drop_managed(dev_link);
> +                       unblocked = true;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       device_links_write_unlock();
> +
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&fwnode_link_lock);
> +       return unblocked;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * fw_devlink_create_devlink - Create a device link from a consumer to fwnode
>   * @con - Consumer device for the device link
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 2f32f38a11ed..d4ccd2a2b6a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -301,6 +301,25 @@ static void deferred_probe_timeout_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>  }
>  static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(deferred_probe_timeout_work, deferred_probe_timeout_work_func);
>
> +static bool deferred_probe_fw_devlink_unblock(void)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev;
> +       struct device_private *private;
> +       bool unblocked = false;
> +
> +       if (!fw_devlink_get_flags() || fw_devlink_is_permissive())
> +               return false;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
> +       list_for_each_entry(private, &deferred_probe_pending_list, deferred_probe) {
> +               dev = private->device;
> +               unblocked |= fw_devlink_unblock_probe(dev);
> +       }
> +       mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
> +
> +       return unblocked;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * deferred_probe_initcall() - Enable probing of deferred devices
>   *
> @@ -317,6 +336,11 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void)
>         driver_deferred_probe_trigger();
>         /* Sort as many dependencies as possible before exiting initcalls */
>         flush_work(&deferred_probe_work);
> +
> +       while (deferred_probe_fw_devlink_unblock()) {
> +               driver_deferred_probe_trigger();
> +               flush_work(&deferred_probe_work);
> +       }
>         initcalls_done = true;
>
>         /*
> --
> 2.30.0.296.g2bfb1c46d8-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-21  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18  3:16 [PATCH v1 0/5] Enable fw_devlink=on by default Saravana Kannan
2020-12-18  3:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] driver core: Add debug logs for device link related probe deferrals Saravana Kannan
2020-12-18  3:17 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] driver core: Add device link support for INFERRED flag Saravana Kannan
2020-12-18  3:17 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] driver core: Have fw_devlink use DL_FLAG_INFERRED Saravana Kannan
2020-12-18  3:17 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] driver core: Handle cycles in device links created by fw_devlink Saravana Kannan
2020-12-18  6:39   ` kernel test robot
2020-12-18  6:39   ` [RFC PATCH] driver core: fw_devlink_relax_cycle() can be static kernel test robot
2020-12-18  6:48   ` [PATCH v1 4/5] driver core: Handle cycles in device links created by fw_devlink kernel test robot
2020-12-18  7:12   ` kernel test robot
2020-12-18  3:17 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default Saravana Kannan
     [not found]   ` <CGME20210111111245eucas1p15acde7ecc2ca7f7782beb8ed74c72022@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-01-11 11:12     ` Marek Szyprowski
     [not found]       ` <CGME20210111141814eucas1p1f388df07b789693a999042b27f0d8c2a@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-01-11 14:18         ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-01-11 21:47           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-12  7:11             ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-01-12 20:51               ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-13  7:04                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-01-13 19:23                   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-14  7:36                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-01-14 18:08                       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-18 17:43                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-17 23:01   ` Michael Walle
2021-01-18 21:01     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-19 10:41       ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20  0:00         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-18 17:39   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-18 17:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 19:16       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-18 19:30         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 21:18         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-19  9:05           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-19 18:08             ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-19 21:50               ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20  9:40                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-20 14:26                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-20 17:22                     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-21 16:04                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-25 23:30                         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-26  8:25                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-20  9:11               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-21  8:22   ` [TEST PATCH v1] driver: core: Make fw_devlink=on more forgiving Saravana Kannan
2021-01-21  8:27     ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2021-01-21 10:37       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-22  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-21 10:33     ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-01-25 17:05   ` [PATCH v1 5/5] driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default Tudor.Ambarus
2021-01-25 18:16     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-28 10:59       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2021-01-28 17:04         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-10  5:54   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-10  8:20     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-10 15:10       ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-10 20:52         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-10 21:21           ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-17  2:39             ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-17  3:05               ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-17  3:13                 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] Enable " Saravana Kannan
2020-12-21  8:18 ` Jisheng Zhang
     [not found]   ` <CAHp75VfqL1QuvjCZ7p23e_2qhY3DUgVNaS--Uk1mEoEHsD8GBA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-14 16:49     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-21  9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-07 20:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-07 21:53   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-13 11:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-13 15:27     ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-13 21:29       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-14 11:34         ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-14 16:40           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-14 16:47             ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-14 16:52               ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-14 18:55                 ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-14 21:50                   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-15 16:12                     ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-15 17:44                       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-13 20:56     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-13 11:30 ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-13 21:26   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-14 16:11     ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-14 16:47       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-14 16:56         ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-28 15:03           ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-28 17:27             ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-11  0:02             ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-11 15:03               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-11 17:14                 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-11 17:48                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-12  3:04                     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-13 11:44 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-01-13 11:48   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-13 21:27     ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGETcx9+JbVAX4uXGn5hYSd-1VK8oZeLxhGAKZksyR31xpeQhg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).