From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759278AbYBXT2M (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:28:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755786AbYBXT1x (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:27:53 -0500 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:2626 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755320AbYBXT1w (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:27:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:27:51 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@netrider.rowland.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Pierre Ossman , Zdenek Kabelac , Kernel development list , pm list Subject: Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted In-Reply-To: <200802241451.17334.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > You know, with this new patch we probably don't need > > device_pm_schedule_removal() any more. > > No, we don't. However, because of that dpm_suspend() and device_power_down() > need to be changed not to assume that the removed devices will end up on > dpm_destroy. Yes. The safest approach will be to check whether the device is still at the end of the dpm_locked or dpm_off list; if it hasn't then we can assume that it has been removed (or scheduled for removal). > IMO you also should add this change in device_power_down(): > > @@ -388,18 +343,15 @@ int device_power_down(pm_message_t state > struct list_head *entry = dpm_off.prev; > struct device *dev = to_device(entry); > > - list_del_init(&dev->power.entry); > error = suspend_device_late(dev, state); > if (error) { > printk(KERN_ERR "Could not power down device %s: " > "error %d\n", > kobject_name(&dev->kobj), error); > - if (list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) > - list_add(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_off); > break; > } > - if (list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) > - list_add(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_off_irq); > + if (!list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) > + list_move(&dev->power.entry, &dpm_off_irq); > } Actually I changed the last two lines to: + + /* Don't move the entry if the device has been unregistered */ + if (entry == dpm_off.prev) + list_move(entry, &dpm_off_irq); with analogous changes to dpm_suspend(). Any more suggestions for updates? Alan Stern