linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, hch@infradead.org
Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kabel@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] docs: Add block device (blkdev) LED trigger documentation
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:46:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e09257e0-ce95-623c-3a04-cc033aa9fec2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUQzdyG+WWoiJ2I9@kroah.com>

Combining 2 related threads ...

On 9/17/21 01:19, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:21:26PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> +What:		/sys/class/leds/<led>/link_device
>> +Date:		September 2021
>> +Contact:	Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com>
>> +Description:
>> +		Associate a block device with this LED by writing the path to
>> +		the device special file (e.g. /dev/sda) to this attribute.
>> +		Symbolic links are followed.  Optionally, the leading "/dev/"
>> +		may be omitted.
> 
> No, please don't follow symlinks, stick with kernel names here,
> otherwise you have a mismatch between that and the list of devices in
> this file:
> 
>> +What:		/sys/class/leds/<led>/linked_devices

I did update the documentation to mention that fact.

Following symlinks is the behavior of blkdev_get_by_path(), not some-
thing that my code is doing.

As far as using kernel names, that would be my preference, but I simply
don't know of any way to do so with the existing block API.  To my
knowledge, there simply isn't anything like a blkdev_get_by_name() API.

This the reason that I added the "retry" logic to led_bdev_get().  It
doesn't prevent the system administrator from using a symbolic link (or
an oddly named special file), but it does make an unqualified name like
"sda" work if the expected special file exists in /dev.

However ...

On 9/17/21 00:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
 > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:21:27PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> +static struct block_device *led_bdev_get(const char *const buf,
>> +					 const size_t count, fmode_t mode)
>> +{
>> +	static const char dev[] = "/dev/";
>> +	struct block_device *bdev;
>> +	char *dev_path, *path;
>> +
>> +	/* sizeof(dev) includes terminating null */
>> +	dev_path = kmalloc(sizeof(dev) + count, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (dev_path == NULL)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> +	/* sizeof(dev) - 1 is compile-time equivalent of strlen(dev) */
>> +	memcpy(dev_path, dev, sizeof(dev) - 1);
>> +	path = dev_path + sizeof(dev) - 1;
>> +	memcpy(path, buf, count + 1);  /* include terminating null */
>> +	strim(path);
>> +
>> +try_blkdev_get:
>> +	bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(path, mode, THIS_MODULE);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(bdev) && PTR_ERR(bdev) == -ENOENT && path != dev_path) {
>> +		path = dev_path;
>> +		goto try_blkdev_get;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kfree(dev_path);
>> +	return bdev;
> 
> Please just required the user to put in the whole path and remove all
> this garbage.  There is no need to build your own broken wrappers around
> the VFS path resolution.

Please be specific about what is broken.

If you see an actual bug in the code, please tell me what it is.

If (as I suspect) you disagree with the basic idea of retrying with
"/dev/" prepended to the supplied path, please say that.

Honestly, I wasn't particularly enthusiastic about it in the first
place; it feels like something that should be done in user space.  I
wouldn't have included it if I didn't have to make a writable copy of
the buffer anyway, in order to trim a trailing newline.

I can certainly remove the re-check logic.  The end result will be an
API that is slightly less "user friendly" in return for saving a bit of
pointer arithmetic and a 5-byte memcpy().

-- 
========================================================================
                  In Soviet Russia, Google searches you!
========================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 20:21 [PATCH v4 0/2] Introduce block device LED trigger Ian Pilcher
2021-09-16 20:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] docs: Add block device (blkdev) LED trigger documentation Ian Pilcher
2021-09-17  6:19   ` Greg KH
2021-09-17 20:46     ` Ian Pilcher [this message]
2021-09-18  7:07       ` Greg KH
2021-09-18 14:43         ` Ian Pilcher
2021-09-20  6:43         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-05 12:24           ` Marek Behún
2021-09-16 20:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: trigger: Add block device LED trigger Ian Pilcher
2021-09-17  5:53   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e09257e0-ce95-623c-3a04-cc033aa9fec2@gmail.com \
    --to=arequipeno@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).