From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tim.Bird@sony.com, yzaikin@google.com
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, brendanhiggins@google.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v2] ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:59:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00f59a2f-6dd5-f972-47b4-28e5c996c2a5@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ECADFF3FD767C149AD96A924E7EA6EAF977D00C3@USCULXMSG01.am.sony.com>
On 10/17/19 5:54 PM, Tim.Bird@sony.com wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Iurii Zaikin
>>
>>> You can do all of this and allow users to supply another set of data.
>>> It doesn't gave to be one or the other.
>>>
>> What is the use case for running a unit test on a different data set than
>> what it comes with?
>
> I just gave some ideas in another message (our emails crossed),
> but one use case is to allow someone besides the test author
> to inject additional data points, and to do so without having to re-compile
> the code.
>
Right. Test author might not think about all the possible ways to
test.
> They might do this for multiple reasons:
> - to experiment with additional data points
> - to try to diagnose a problem they are seeing
> - to fill gaps they see in existing data points
>
Thanks for explaining the scenarios.
> Whether this makes sense depends on a lot of factors. I suspect
> the timestamp test code is not a good candidate for this, as the code
> is simple enough that adding a new test case is pretty trivial. For some
> other types of tests, adding the data via an external file could be easier
> than changing the code of the test.
I agree. Even if author thinks of all the different ways (I am convinced
of that), still taking test data at run-time makes the unit test just
more effective.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 2:39 [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v2] ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-10 3:46 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-10 16:45 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-10 20:29 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-10 23:49 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-10 17:11 ` Shuah Khan
2019-10-10 22:13 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-11 10:05 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-11 13:19 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-12 2:38 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-16 22:18 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-16 23:26 ` Shuah Khan
2019-10-17 0:07 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-17 12:08 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-17 22:25 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-17 22:56 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-17 23:40 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-18 1:40 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-18 2:40 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-18 15:27 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-18 20:24 ` Shuah Khan
2019-10-24 1:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-18 1:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-18 1:30 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-17 22:49 ` Shuah Khan
2019-10-17 23:07 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-17 23:12 ` Shuah Khan
2019-10-17 23:27 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-17 23:42 ` Shuah Khan
2019-10-17 23:54 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-17 23:59 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2019-10-18 0:11 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-18 0:38 ` Tim.Bird
2019-10-18 1:06 ` Iurii Zaikin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00f59a2f-6dd5-f972-47b4-28e5c996c2a5@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).