linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	amit.kachhap@arm.com, andreyknvl@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] kselftest: arm64: extend toplevel skeleton Makefile
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 19:22:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e12898b-0892-6bd2-1736-e760f38d77c5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190917160534.GK27757@arm.com>

Hi

On 17/09/2019 17:05, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:31:01pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>> Modify KSFT arm64 toplevel Makefile to maintain arm64 kselftests organized
>> by subsystem, keeping them into distinct subdirectories under arm64 custom
>> KSFT directory: tools/testing/selftests/arm64/
>>
>> Add to such toplevel Makefile a mechanism to guess the effective location
>> of Kernel headers as installed by KSFT framework.
>>
>> Fit existing arm64 tags kselftest into this new schema moving them into
>> their own subdirectory (arm64/tags).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Based on:
>> commit 9ce1263033cd ("selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing
>> 		     tagged pointers to kernel")
>> ---
>> v5 --> v6
>> - using realpath to avoid passing down relative paths
>> - fix commit msg & Copyright
>> - removed unneded Makefile export
>> - added SUBTARGETS specification, to allow building specific only some
>>   arm64 test subsystems
>> v4 --> v5
>> - rebased on arm64/for-next/core
>> - merged this patch with KSFT arm64 tags patch, while moving the latter
>>   into its own subdir
>> - moved kernel header includes search mechanism from KSFT arm64
>>   SIGNAL Makefile
>> - export proper top_srcdir ENV for lib.mk
>> v3 --> v4
>> - comment reword
>> - simplified documentation in README
>> - dropped README about standalone
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/Makefile              |  1 +
>>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile        | 63 +++++++++++++++++--
>>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/README          | 25 ++++++++
>>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile   |  6 ++
>>  .../arm64/{ => tags}/run_tags_test.sh         |  0
>>  .../selftests/arm64/{ => tags}/tags_test.c    |  0
>>  6 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/README
>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile
>>  rename tools/testing/selftests/arm64/{ => tags}/run_tags_test.sh (100%)
>>  rename tools/testing/selftests/arm64/{ => tags}/tags_test.c (100%)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>> index 25b43a8c2b15..1722dae9381a 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>  TARGETS = android
>> +TARGETS += arm64
>>  TARGETS += bpf
>>  TARGETS += breakpoints
>>  TARGETS += capabilities
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
>> index a61b2e743e99..cbb2a5a9e3fc 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
>> @@ -1,11 +1,66 @@
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>  
>> -# ARCH can be overridden by the user for cross compiling
>> +# When ARCH not overridden for crosscompiling, lookup machine
>>  ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
>>  
>>  ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),aarch64 arm64))
>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS := tags_test
>> -TEST_PROGS := run_tags_test.sh
>> +SUBTARGETS ?= tags
>> +else
>> +SUBTARGETS :=
>>  endif
>>  
>> -include ../lib.mk
>> +CFLAGS := -Wall -O2 -g
>> +
>> +# A proper top_srcdir is needed by KSFT(lib.mk)
>> +top_srcdir = $(realpath ../../../../)
>> +
>> +# Additional include paths needed by kselftest.h and local headers
>> +CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/testing/selftests/
>> +
>> +# Guessing where the Kernel headers could have been installed
>> +# depending on ENV config
>> +ifeq ($(KBUILD_OUTPUT),)
>> +khdr_dir = $(top_srcdir)/usr/include
>> +else
>> +# the KSFT preferred location when KBUILD_OUTPUT is set
>> +khdr_dir = $(KBUILD_OUTPUT)/kselftest/usr/include
>> +endif
> 
> I still tend to think that for now we should just do what all the other
> tests do.
> 
> Most tests use
> 
> 	CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
> 
> in their Makefiles.
> 
> For us, the test Makefiles are nested one level deeper, so I guess
> we would put
> 
> 	CFLAGS += -I../../../../../usr/include/
> 
> in each.
> 
> 
> This will break in some cases, but only in the same cases where
> kselftest is already broken.
> 
> Ideally we would fix this globally, but can that instead be done
> independently of this series?
> 
> Fixing only arm64, by pasting some arbitrary logic from
> selftests/Makefile doesn't seem like a future-proof approach.
> 
> 
> Or did I miss something?
> 

I've left this bit as it is in v7 (fixing some other minor stuff) as we discussed,
since I'm still waiting for some Shuah's comments.

>> +
>> +CFLAGS += -I$(khdr_dir)
>> +
>> +export CFLAGS
>> +export top_srcdir
>> +
>> +all:
>> +	@for DIR in $(SUBTARGETS); do				\
>> +		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
>> +		mkdir -p $$BUILD_TARGET;			\
>> +		make OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
>> +	done
>> +
>> +install: all
>> +	@for DIR in $(SUBTARGETS); do				\
>> +		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
>> +		make OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
>> +	done
>> +
>> +run_tests: all
>> +	@for DIR in $(SUBTARGETS); do				\
>> +		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
>> +		make OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
>> +	done
>> +
>> +# Avoid any output on non arm64 on emit_tests
> 
> This comment can be dropped: the whole file does nothing for
> non-arm64, and it achieves it in the same way as other arch-specific
> Makefiles, so it's odd to have the comment here specifically (?)
> 
> 

Ok I'll fix in v7

> With or without the above changes, I'm happy to give
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> 
> (but Shuah or someone will need to give a view on how this integrates
> with kselftest overall).
> 

I'll wait for Shuah's comments as said.

Thanks

Cristian
> [...]
> 
> Cheers
> ---Dave
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-07 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-10 12:31 [PATCH v6 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] kselftest: arm64: extend toplevel skeleton Makefile Cristian Marussi
2019-09-17 13:42   ` Anders Roxell
2019-09-17 15:17     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-17 15:29       ` shuah
2019-09-17 15:58         ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-17 16:16           ` shuah
2019-09-17 16:05   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-17 16:18     ` shuah
2019-09-18 10:17       ` Dave Martin
2019-09-18 10:59       ` Cristian Marussi
2019-10-07 18:22     ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle and common utils Cristian Marussi
2019-09-17 16:05   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-26 11:00     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el[123][ht] Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs Cristian Marussi
2019-09-17 16:05   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-07 18:23     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-10-08 15:07       ` Dave Martin
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic Cristian Marussi
2019-09-17 16:06   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-07 18:23     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size_for_magic0 Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-09-17 16:06   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size Cristian Marussi
2019-09-10 12:31 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e12898b-0892-6bd2-1736-e760f38d77c5@arm.com \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).