* Re: dma-buf: Add selftests for dma-fence
@ 2019-08-27 12:30 Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-27 12:36 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-08-27 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson
Cc: DRI Development, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK
Hi Chris,
When running the new dmabuf-selftests on two different systems, I get:
dma-buf: Running sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence
sizeof(dma_fence)=48
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_signaling
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_status
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_error
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait_timeout
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_stub
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/race_signal_callback
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 28855 passes, 3929 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 28846 passes, 3918 misses
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 37179 passes, 37179 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 37184 passes, 37183 misses
and
dma-buf: Running sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence
sizeof(dma_fence)=64
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/sanitycheck
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_signaling
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_add_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_rm_callback
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_status
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_error
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait_timeout
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_stub
dma-buf: Running dma_fence/race_signal_callback
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 3423 passes, 2148 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 2360 passes, 9 misses
thread_signal_callback[0] completed 4028 passes, 4028 misses
thread_signal_callback[1] completed 8080 passes, 8079 misses
Unfortunately it is not clear to me if this is good or bad?
Perhaps the test output can be improved, e.g. with a clear PASS/FAIL output?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: dma-buf: Add selftests for dma-fence
2019-08-27 12:30 dma-buf: Add selftests for dma-fence Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2019-08-27 12:36 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-08-27 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: DRI Development, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2019-08-27 13:30:04)
> Hi Chris,
>
> When running the new dmabuf-selftests on two different systems, I get:
>
> dma-buf: Running sanitycheck
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence
> sizeof(dma_fence)=48
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/sanitycheck
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_signaling
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_add_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_add_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_rm_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_rm_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_status
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_error
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait_timeout
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_stub
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/race_signal_callback
> thread_signal_callback[0] completed 28855 passes, 3929 misses
> thread_signal_callback[1] completed 28846 passes, 3918 misses
> thread_signal_callback[0] completed 37179 passes, 37179 misses
> thread_signal_callback[1] completed 37184 passes, 37183 misses
>
> and
>
> dma-buf: Running sanitycheck
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence
> sizeof(dma_fence)=64
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/sanitycheck
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_signaling
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_add_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_add_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_rm_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_late_rm_callback
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_status
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_error
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_wait_timeout
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/test_stub
> dma-buf: Running dma_fence/race_signal_callback
> thread_signal_callback[0] completed 3423 passes, 2148 misses
> thread_signal_callback[1] completed 2360 passes, 9 misses
> thread_signal_callback[0] completed 4028 passes, 4028 misses
> thread_signal_callback[1] completed 8080 passes, 8079 misses
>
> Unfortunately it is not clear to me if this is good or bad?
> Perhaps the test output can be improved, e.g. with a clear PASS/FAIL output?
It's communicated via the error code, along with failure messages. For
more complex persistent selftest modules, we use an modparam to report
the error code.
See igt/dmabuf for the test runner.
-Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-27 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-27 12:30 dma-buf: Add selftests for dma-fence Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-27 12:36 ` Chris Wilson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).