From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5BBC433F5 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231442AbiI3PBn (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:01:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34390 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231473AbiI3PA7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:00:59 -0400 Received: from mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk [46.183.139.199]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8CB81C2970; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 07:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout.gigahost.dk (mailout.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.112]) by mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1745C1884494; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gigahost.dk (smtp.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.109]) by mailout.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028A62500015; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gigahost.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0E8B9EC0007; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:59:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Screener-Id: 413d8c6ce5bf6eab4824d0abaab02863e8e3f662 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:59:13 +0200 From: netdev@kapio-technology.com To: Ido Schimmel Cc: Jakub Kicinski , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Vladimir Oltean , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Kurt Kanzenbach , Hauke Mehrtens , Woojung Huh , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Matthias Brugger , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , Jiri Pirko , Ivan Vecera , Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Shuah Khan , Russell King , Christian Marangi , Daniel Borkmann , Yuwei Wang , Petr Machata , Florent Fourcot , Hans Schultz , Joachim Wiberg , Amit Cohen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 0/9] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) In-Reply-To: References: <20220928150256.115248-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20220929091036.3812327f@kernel.org> <12587604af1ed79be4d3a1607987483a@kapio-technology.com> <20220929112744.27cc969b@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gigahost Webmail Message-ID: <16d6db15df0a875e442456ff56234b98@kapio-technology.com> X-Sender: netdev@kapio-technology.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On 2022-09-30 16:05, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:42:37AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com > wrote: >> Obviously my method of selecting all switchcore drivers with >> sub-options >> under menuconfig was not sufficient, and I didn't know of the >> allmodconfig >> option, otherwise I would have used it. > > You can see build issues on patchwork: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220928150256.115248-6-netdev@kapio-technology.com/ > > Also: > > https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#what-level-of-testing-is-expected-before-i-submit-my-change > > https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#can-i-reproduce-the-checks-from-patchwork-on-my-local-machine > > https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#running-all-the-builds-and-checks-locally-is-a-pain-can-i-post-my-patches-and-have-the-patchwork-bot-validate-them > >> So the question is if I should repost the fixed patch-set or I need to >> make >> a new version? > > A new fixed version (v7) is required, but wait for this version to be > reviewed first. > >> Anyhow I hope that there will not be problems when running the >> selftests, as >> I have not been able to do so with my system, so there can be more >> that >> needs to be changed. > > It's not really acceptable to post tests that you haven't run... What > exactly is the issue? You should be able to run the tests with veth > pairs in a VM. It is only the blackhole test that I have not been able to run as is, but I have stepped it manually as far as I could. My environment has changed lately and in that context the building of the selftests fails and I don't know why,I just get some error messagesabout missing header files, and setting up a whole system like f.ex. linuxfromscratch with the necessary libs and tools to run it in a VM is too time consuming a task at the moment. If there is some freely available system for the purpose out there besides my own system based on Buildroot that does not work now, please let me know...