From: avagin at virtuozzo.com (Andrey Vagin)
Subject: Setting monotonic time?
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 20:51:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001205124.GA23620@outlook.office365.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ej2xc23.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:15:32AM +0200, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> In the context of process migration there is a simpler subproblem that I
> think it is worth exploring if we can do something about.
>
> For a cluster of machines all running with synchronized
> clocks. CLOCK_REALTIME matches. CLOCK_MONOTNIC does not match between
> machines. Not having a matching CLOCK_MONOTONIC prevents successful
> process migration between nodes in that cluster.
>
> Would it be possible to allow setting CLOCK_MONOTONIC at the very
> beginning of time? So that all of the nodes in a cluster can be in
> sync?
Here is a question about how to synchronize clocks between nodes. It
looks like we will need to have a working network for this, but a
network configuration may be non-trivial and it can require to run a few
processes which can use CLOCK_MONOTNIC...
>
> No change in skew just in offset for CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
>
> There are also dragons involved in coordinating things so that
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC gets set before CLOCK_MONOTONIC gets used. So I don't
> know if allowing CLOCK_MONOTONIC to be set would be practical but it
> seems work exploring all on it's own.
>
> Dmitry would setting CLOCK_MONOTONIC exactly once at boot time solve
> your problem that is you are looking at a time namespace to solve?
Process migration is only one of use-cases. Another use-case is
restoring from snapshots. It may be even more popular than process
migration. We can't guarantee that all snapshots will be done in one
cluster. For example, a user meets a bug, does a container snapshot and
attaches it to a bug report.
>
> Eric
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: avagin@virtuozzo.com (Andrey Vagin)
Subject: Setting monotonic time?
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 20:51:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001205124.GA23620@outlook.office365.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181001205136.FWRgq3JPX1kPgInmkA0i_ev7HUfrTk0nd522MBFSeCY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ej2xc23.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018@11:15:32AM +0200, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> In the context of process migration there is a simpler subproblem that I
> think it is worth exploring if we can do something about.
>
> For a cluster of machines all running with synchronized
> clocks. CLOCK_REALTIME matches. CLOCK_MONOTNIC does not match between
> machines. Not having a matching CLOCK_MONOTONIC prevents successful
> process migration between nodes in that cluster.
>
> Would it be possible to allow setting CLOCK_MONOTONIC at the very
> beginning of time? So that all of the nodes in a cluster can be in
> sync?
Here is a question about how to synchronize clocks between nodes. It
looks like we will need to have a working network for this, but a
network configuration may be non-trivial and it can require to run a few
processes which can use CLOCK_MONOTNIC...
>
> No change in skew just in offset for CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
>
> There are also dragons involved in coordinating things so that
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC gets set before CLOCK_MONOTONIC gets used. So I don't
> know if allowing CLOCK_MONOTONIC to be set would be practical but it
> seems work exploring all on it's own.
>
> Dmitry would setting CLOCK_MONOTONIC exactly once at boot time solve
> your problem that is you are looking at a time namespace to solve?
Process migration is only one of use-cases. Another use-case is
restoring from snapshots. It may be even more popular than process
migration. We can't guarantee that all snapshots will be done in one
cluster. For example, a user meets a bug, does a container snapshot and
attaches it to a bug report.
>
> Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-01 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-19 20:50 [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 16/20] selftest: Add Time Namespace test for supported clocks dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-24 21:36 ` shuah
2018-09-24 21:36 ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 17/20] selftest/timens: Add test for timerfd dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 18/20] selftest/timens: Add test for clock_nanosleep dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 19/20] timens/selftest: Add procfs selftest dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 20/20] timens/selftest: Add timer offsets test dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-21 12:27 ` [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace ebiederm
2018-09-21 12:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-24 20:51 ` avagin
2018-09-24 20:51 ` Andrey Vagin
2018-09-24 22:02 ` ebiederm
2018-09-24 22:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 1:42 ` avagin
2018-09-25 1:42 ` Andrey Vagin
2018-09-26 17:36 ` ebiederm
2018-09-26 17:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-26 17:59 ` 0x7f454c46
2018-09-26 17:59 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-27 21:30 ` tglx
2018-09-27 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 21:41 ` tglx
2018-09-27 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 23:20 ` avagin
2018-10-01 23:20 ` Andrey Vagin
2018-10-02 6:15 ` tglx
2018-10-02 6:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-02 21:05 ` 0x7f454c46
2018-10-02 21:05 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-10-02 21:26 ` tglx
2018-10-02 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-28 17:03 ` ebiederm
2018-09-28 17:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-28 19:32 ` tglx
2018-09-28 19:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 9:05 ` ebiederm
2018-10-01 9:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-01 9:15 ` Setting monotonic time? ebiederm
2018-10-01 9:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-01 18:52 ` tglx
2018-10-01 18:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-02 20:00 ` arnd
2018-10-02 20:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-02 20:06 ` tglx
2018-10-02 20:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03 4:50 ` ebiederm
2018-10-03 4:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-03 5:25 ` tglx
2018-10-03 5:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03 6:14 ` ebiederm
2018-10-03 6:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-03 7:02 ` arnd
2018-10-03 7:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-03 6:14 ` tglx
2018-10-03 6:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 20:51 ` avagin [this message]
2018-10-01 20:51 ` Andrey Vagin
2018-10-02 6:16 ` tglx
2018-10-02 6:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-21 1:41 ` [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace avagin
2018-10-21 1:41 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-21 3:54 ` avagin
2018-10-21 3:54 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-29 20:33 ` tglx
2018-10-29 20:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-29 21:21 ` ebiederm
2018-10-29 21:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-29 21:36 ` tglx
2018-10-29 21:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-31 16:26 ` avagin
2018-10-31 16:26 ` Andrei Vagin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181001205124.GA23620@outlook.office365.com \
--to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).