linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] x86: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 10:19:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506081951.GJ2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190506081951.woAFRuqBNQqLkTUYXh0Q8VfoHoSo69E2oeEPfBe68_c@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjrOLqBG1qe9C3T=fLN0m=78FgNOGOEL22gU=+Pw6Mu9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 03, 2019@11:57:22AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019@9:21 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> >
> > So here’s a somewhat nutty suggestion: how about we tweak the 32-bit
> > entry code to emulate the sane 64-bit frame, not just for int3 but
> > always?
> 
> What would the code actually end up looking like? I don't necessarily
> object, since that kernel_stack_pointer() thing certainly looks
> horrible, but honestly, my suggestion to just pass in the 'struct
> pt_regs' and let the call emulation fix it up would have also worked,
> and avoided that bug (and who knows what else might be hiding).
> 
> I really think that you're now hitting all the special case magic
> low-level crap that I wanted to avoid.

This did actually boot on first try; so there must be something horribly
wrong...

Now, I know you like that other approach; but I figured I should at
least show you what this one looks like. Maybe I've been staring at
entry_32.S too much, but I really don't dislike this.

---
 arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S            | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S            |  14 +++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h        |   4 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h |  20 +++++
 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c        |  81 ++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c             |  29 -------
 6 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index 7b23431be5cb..d29cf03219c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -67,9 +67,20 @@
 # define preempt_stop(clobbers)	DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(clobbers); TRACE_IRQS_OFF
 #else
 # define preempt_stop(clobbers)
-# define resume_kernel		restore_all_kernel
 #endif
 
+.macro RETINT_PREEMPT
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+	DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_ANY)
+	cmpl	$0, PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
+	jnz	.Lend_\@
+	testl	$X86_EFLAGS_IF, PT_EFLAGS(%esp)	# interrupts off (exception path) ?
+	jz	.Lend_\@
+	call	preempt_schedule_irq
+.Lend_\@:
+#endif
+.endm
+
 .macro TRACE_IRQS_IRET
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	testl	$X86_EFLAGS_IF, PT_EFLAGS(%esp)     # interrupts off?
@@ -203,8 +214,119 @@
 .Lend_\@:
 .endm
 
+#define CS_FROM_ENTRY_STACK	(1 << 31)
+#define CS_FROM_USER_CR3	(1 << 30)
+#define CS_FROM_KERNEL		(1 << 29)
+
+.macro FIXUP_FRAME
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_VM86
+	testl	$X86_EFLAGS_VM, 3*4(%esp)
+	jnz	.Lfrom_usermode_no_fixup_\@
+#endif
+	testl	$SEGMENT_RPL_MASK, 2*4(%esp)
+	jnz	.Lfrom_usermode_no_fixup_\@
+
+	orl	$CS_FROM_KERNEL, 2*4(%esp)
+
+	/*
+	 * When we're here from kernel mode; the (exception) stack looks like:
+	 *
+	 * 4*4(%esp) - <previous context>
+	 * 3*4(%esp) - flags
+	 * 2*4(%esp) - cs
+	 * 1*4(%esp) - ip
+	 * 0*4(%esp) - orig_eax
+	 *
+	 * Lets build a 5 entry IRET frame after that, such that struct pt_regs
+	 * is complete and in particular regs->sp is correct. This gives us
+	 * the original 4 enties as gap:
+	 *
+	 * 10*4(%esp) - <previous context>
+	 *  9*4(%esp) - gap / flags
+	 *  8*4(%esp) - gap / cs
+	 *  7*4(%esp) - gap / ip
+	 *  6*4(%esp) - gap / orig_eax
+	 *  5*4(%esp) - ss
+	 *  4*4(%esp) - sp
+	 *  3*4(%esp) - flags
+	 *  2*4(%esp) - cs
+	 *  1*4(%esp) - ip
+	 *  0*4(%esp) - orig_eax
+	 */
+
+	pushl	%ss		# ss
+	pushl	%esp		# sp (points at ss)
+	add	$5*4, (%esp)	# point sp back at the previous context
+	pushl	5*4(%esp)	# flags
+	pushl	5*4(%esp)	# cs
+	pushl	5*4(%esp)	# ip
+	pushl	5*4(%esp)	# orig_eax
+
+.Lfrom_usermode_no_fixup_\@:
+.endm
+
+.macro IRET_FRAME
+
+	/* orig_eax is already POP'ed when we're here */
+
+	testl $CS_FROM_KERNEL, 1*4(%esp)
+	jz .Lfinished_frame_\@
+
+	pushl %eax
+
+	lea 10*4(%esp), %eax	# address of <previous context>
+	cmpl %eax, 4*4(%esp)	# if ->sp is unmodified
+	jnz .Lmodified_sp_do_fixup_\@
+
+	/*
+	 * Fast path; regs->sp wasn't modified, reuse the original IRET frame.
+	 */
+	pop %eax
+	add $6*4, %esp
+	jmp .Lfinished_frame_\@;
+
+.Lmodified_sp_do_fixup_\@:
+
+	/*
+	 * Reconstruct the 3 entry IRET frame right after the (modified)
+	 * regs->sp without lowering %esp in between, such that an NMI in the
+	 * middle doesn't scribble our stack.
+	 */
+	pushl	%ecx
+	movl	5*4(%esp), %eax		# (modified) regs->sp
+
+	movl	4*4(%esp), %ecx		# flags
+	movl	%ecx, -4(%eax)
+
+	movl	3*4(%esp), %ecx		# cs
+	andl	$0x0000ffff, %ecx
+	movl	%ecx, -8(%eax)
+
+	movl	2*4(%esp), %ecx		# ip
+	movl	%ecx, -12(%eax)
+
+	movl	1*4(%esp), %ecx		# eax
+	movl	%ecx, -16(%eax)
+
+	popl	%ecx
+	lea	-16(%eax), %esp
+	popl	%eax
+
+.Lfinished_frame_\@:
+.endm
+
 .macro SAVE_ALL pt_regs_ax=%eax switch_stacks=0
+
 	cld
+	/*
+	 * The high bits of the CS dword (__csh) are used for CS_FROM_*.
+	 * Clear them in case hardware didn't do this for us.
+	 */
+	andl	$(0x0000ffff), 2*4(%esp)
+
+	FIXUP_FRAME
+
 	PUSH_GS
 	pushl	%fs
 	pushl	%es
@@ -375,9 +497,6 @@
  * switch to it before we do any copying.
  */
 
-#define CS_FROM_ENTRY_STACK	(1 << 31)
-#define CS_FROM_USER_CR3	(1 << 30)
-
 .macro SWITCH_TO_KERNEL_STACK
 
 	ALTERNATIVE     "", "jmp .Lend_\@", X86_FEATURE_XENPV
@@ -391,13 +510,6 @@
 	 * that register for the time this macro runs
 	 */
 
-	/*
-	 * The high bits of the CS dword (__csh) are used for
-	 * CS_FROM_ENTRY_STACK and CS_FROM_USER_CR3. Clear them in case
-	 * hardware didn't do this for us.
-	 */
-	andl	$(0x0000ffff), PT_CS(%esp)
-
 	/* Are we on the entry stack? Bail out if not! */
 	movl	PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_entry_area), %ecx
 	addl	$CPU_ENTRY_AREA_entry_stack + SIZEOF_entry_stack, %ecx
@@ -755,7 +867,7 @@ END(ret_from_fork)
 	andl	$SEGMENT_RPL_MASK, %eax
 #endif
 	cmpl	$USER_RPL, %eax
-	jb	resume_kernel			# not returning to v8086 or userspace
+	jb	restore_all_kernel		# not returning to v8086 or userspace
 
 ENTRY(resume_userspace)
 	DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_ANY)
@@ -765,18 +877,6 @@ ENTRY(resume_userspace)
 	jmp	restore_all
 END(ret_from_exception)
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
-ENTRY(resume_kernel)
-	DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_ANY)
-	cmpl	$0, PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
-	jnz	restore_all_kernel
-	testl	$X86_EFLAGS_IF, PT_EFLAGS(%esp)	# interrupts off (exception path) ?
-	jz	restore_all_kernel
-	call	preempt_schedule_irq
-	jmp	restore_all_kernel
-END(resume_kernel)
-#endif
-
 GLOBAL(__begin_SYSENTER_singlestep_region)
 /*
  * All code from here through __end_SYSENTER_singlestep_region is subject
@@ -1019,6 +1119,7 @@ ENTRY(entry_INT80_32)
 	/* Restore user state */
 	RESTORE_REGS pop=4			# skip orig_eax/error_code
 .Lirq_return:
+	IRET_FRAME
 	/*
 	 * ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE rely on IRET core serialization
 	 * when returning from IPI handler and when returning from
@@ -1027,6 +1128,7 @@ ENTRY(entry_INT80_32)
 	INTERRUPT_RETURN
 
 restore_all_kernel:
+	RETINT_PREEMPT
 	TRACE_IRQS_IRET
 	PARANOID_EXIT_TO_KERNEL_MODE
 	BUG_IF_WRONG_CR3
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index 20e45d9b4e15..268cd9affe04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ apicinterrupt IRQ_WORK_VECTOR			irq_work_interrupt		smp_irq_work_interrupt
  * @paranoid == 2 is special: the stub will never switch stacks.  This is for
  * #DF: if the thread stack is somehow unusable, we'll still get a useful OOPS.
  */
-.macro idtentry sym do_sym has_error_code:req paranoid=0 shift_ist=-1 ist_offset=0
+.macro idtentry sym do_sym has_error_code:req paranoid=0 shift_ist=-1 ist_offset=0 create_gap=0
 ENTRY(\sym)
 	UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS offset=\has_error_code*8
 
@@ -898,6 +898,16 @@ ENTRY(\sym)
 	jnz	.Lfrom_usermode_switch_stack_\@
 	.endif
 
+	.if \create_gap == 1
+	testb	$3, CS-ORIG_RAX(%rsp)
+	jnz	.Lfrom_usermode_no_gap_\@
+	.rept 6
+	pushq	5*8(%rsp)
+	.endr
+	UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS offset=8
+.Lfrom_usermode_no_gap_\@:
+	.endif
+
 	.if \paranoid
 	call	paranoid_entry
 	.else
@@ -1129,7 +1139,7 @@ apicinterrupt3 HYPERV_STIMER0_VECTOR \
 #endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
 
 idtentry debug			do_debug		has_error_code=0	paranoid=1 shift_ist=IST_INDEX_DB ist_offset=DB_STACK_OFFSET
-idtentry int3			do_int3			has_error_code=0
+idtentry int3			do_int3			has_error_code=0	create_gap=1
 idtentry stack_segment		do_stack_segment	has_error_code=1
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
index 8a7fc0cca2d1..5ff42dc8b396 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -166,14 +166,10 @@ static inline bool user_64bit_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
 #define compat_user_stack_pointer()	current_pt_regs()->sp
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-extern unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
-#else
 static inline unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	return regs->sp;
 }
-#endif
 
 #define GET_IP(regs) ((regs)->ip)
 #define GET_FP(regs) ((regs)->bp)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
index c90678fd391a..6aac6abf931e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
@@ -42,4 +42,24 @@ extern int after_bootmem;
 extern __ro_after_init struct mm_struct *poking_mm;
 extern __ro_after_init unsigned long poking_addr;
 
+static inline void int3_emulate_push(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long val)
+{
+	regs->sp -= sizeof(unsigned long);
+	*(unsigned long *)regs->sp = val;
+}
+
+static inline void int3_emulate_jmp(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long ip)
+{
+	regs->ip = ip;
+}
+
+#define INT3_INSN_SIZE 1
+#define CALL_INSN_SIZE 5
+
+static inline void int3_emulate_call(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long func)
+{
+	int3_emulate_push(regs, regs->ip - INT3_INSN_SIZE + CALL_INSN_SIZE);
+	int3_emulate_jmp(regs, func);
+}
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_TEXT_PATCHING_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 4db9c0d29bc1..9519bc553d6d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -613,11 +613,83 @@ extern struct paravirt_patch_site __start_parainstructions[],
 	__stop_parainstructions[];
 #endif	/* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
 
+/*
+ * Self-test for the INT3 based CALL emulation code.
+ *
+ * This exercises int3_emulate_call() to make sure INT3 pt_regs are set up
+ * properly and that there is a stack gap between the INT3 frame and the
+ * previous context. Without this gap doing a virtual PUSH on the interrupted
+ * stack would corrupt the INT3 IRET frame.
+ *
+ * See entry_{32,64}.S for more details.
+ */
+static void __init int3_magic(unsigned int *ptr)
+{
+	*ptr = 1;
+}
+
+extern __initdata unsigned long int3_selftest_ip; /* defined in asm below */
+
+static int __init
+int3_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data)
+{
+	struct die_args *args = data;
+	struct pt_regs *regs = args->regs;
+
+	if (!regs || user_mode(regs))
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	if (val != DIE_INT3)
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	if (regs->ip - INT3_INSN_SIZE != int3_selftest_ip)
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	int3_emulate_call(regs, (unsigned long)&int3_magic);
+	return NOTIFY_STOP;
+}
+
+static void __init int3_selftest(void)
+{
+	static __initdata struct notifier_block int3_exception_nb = {
+		.notifier_call	= int3_exception_notify,
+		.priority	= INT_MAX-1, /* last */
+	};
+	unsigned int val = 0;
+
+	BUG_ON(register_die_notifier(&int3_exception_nb));
+
+	/*
+	 * Basically: int3_magic(&val); but really complicated :-)
+	 *
+	 * Stick the address of the INT3 instruction into int3_selftest_ip,
+	 * then trigger the INT3, padded with NOPs to match a CALL instruction
+	 * length.
+	 */
+	asm volatile ("1: int3; nop; nop; nop; nop\n\t"
+		      ".pushsection .init.data,\"aw\"\n\t"
+		      ".align " __ASM_SEL(4, 8) "\n\t"
+		      ".type int3_selftest_ip, @object\n\t"
+		      ".size int3_selftest_ip, " __ASM_SEL(4, 8) "\n\t"
+		      "int3_selftest_ip:\n\t"
+		      __ASM_SEL(.long, .quad) " 1b\n\t"
+		      ".popsection\n\t"
+		      : : __ASM_SEL_RAW(a, D) (&val) : "memory");
+
+	BUG_ON(val != 1);
+
+	unregister_die_notifier(&int3_exception_nb);
+}
+
 void __init alternative_instructions(void)
 {
-	/* The patching is not fully atomic, so try to avoid local interruptions
-	   that might execute the to be patched code.
-	   Other CPUs are not running. */
+	int3_selftest();
+
+	/*
+	 * The patching is not fully atomic, so try to avoid local
+	 * interruptions that might execute the to be patched code.
+	 * Other CPUs are not running.
+	 */
 	stop_nmi();
 
 	/*
@@ -642,10 +714,11 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(void)
 					    _text, _etext);
 	}
 
-	if (!uniproc_patched || num_possible_cpus() == 1)
+	if (!uniproc_patched || num_possible_cpus() == 1) {
 		free_init_pages("SMP alternatives",
 				(unsigned long)__smp_locks,
 				(unsigned long)__smp_locks_end);
+	}
 #endif
 
 	apply_paravirt(__parainstructions, __parainstructions_end);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 4b8ee05dd6ad..d13f892d2c47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -153,35 +153,6 @@ static inline bool invalid_selector(u16 value)
 
 #define FLAG_MASK		FLAG_MASK_32
 
-/*
- * X86_32 CPUs don't save ss and esp if the CPU is already in kernel mode
- * when it traps.  The previous stack will be directly underneath the saved
- * registers, and 'sp/ss' won't even have been saved. Thus the '&regs->sp'.
- *
- * Now, if the stack is empty, '&regs->sp' is out of range. In this
- * case we try to take the previous stack. To always return a non-null
- * stack pointer we fall back to regs as stack if no previous stack
- * exists.
- *
- * This is valid only for kernel mode traps.
- */
-unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	unsigned long context = (unsigned long)regs & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1);
-	unsigned long sp = (unsigned long)&regs->sp;
-	u32 *prev_esp;
-
-	if (context == (sp & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)))
-		return sp;
-
-	prev_esp = (u32 *)(context);
-	if (*prev_esp)
-		return (unsigned long)*prev_esp;
-
-	return (unsigned long)regs;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_stack_pointer);
-
 static unsigned long *pt_regs_access(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long regno)
 {
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, bx) != 0);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-06  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 204+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190501202830.347656894@goodmis.org>
2019-05-01 20:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] x86: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions rostedt
2019-05-01 20:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-02  3:24   ` rostedt
2019-05-02  3:24     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-02 16:21     ` peterz
2019-05-02 16:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-02 16:29       ` peterz
2019-05-02 16:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-02 18:02       ` torvalds
2019-05-02 18:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-02 18:18         ` peterz
2019-05-02 18:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-02 18:30           ` peterz
2019-05-02 18:30             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-02 18:43           ` torvalds
2019-05-02 18:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-02 19:28             ` jikos
2019-05-02 19:28               ` Jiri Kosina
2019-05-02 20:25               ` luto
2019-05-02 20:25                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-02 20:21             ` peterz
2019-05-02 20:21               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-02 20:49               ` torvalds
2019-05-02 20:49                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-02 21:32                 ` peterz
2019-05-02 21:32                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 19:24                 ` rostedt
2019-05-03 19:24                   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03 21:46                   ` torvalds
2019-05-03 21:46                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-03 22:49                     ` rostedt
2019-05-03 22:49                       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03 23:07                       ` torvalds
2019-05-03 23:07                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-04  4:17                         ` rostedt
2019-05-04  4:17                           ` Steven Rostedt
     [not found]                           ` <CAHk-=wiuSFbv_rELND-BLWcP0GSZ0yF=xOAEcf61GE3bU9d=yg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-04 18:59                             ` torvalds
2019-05-04 18:59                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-04 20:12                               ` luto
2019-05-04 20:12                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-04 20:28                                 ` torvalds
2019-05-04 20:28                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-04 20:36                                 ` torvalds
2019-05-04 20:36                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-03 22:55                     ` luto
2019-05-03 22:55                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-03 23:16                       ` torvalds
2019-05-03 23:16                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-03 23:32                         ` luto
2019-05-03 23:32                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-02 22:52               ` rostedt
2019-05-02 22:52                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-02 23:31                 ` rostedt
2019-05-02 23:31                   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-02 23:50                   ` rostedt
2019-05-02 23:50                     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03  1:51                     ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] " rostedt
2019-05-03  1:51                       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03  9:29                     ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " peterz
2019-05-03  9:29                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 13:22                       ` rostedt
2019-05-03 13:22                         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03 16:20                         ` luto
2019-05-03 16:20                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-03 16:31                           ` rostedt
2019-05-03 16:31                             ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03 16:35                             ` peterz
2019-05-03 16:35                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 16:44                               ` luto
2019-05-03 16:44                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-03 16:49                                 ` rostedt
2019-05-03 16:49                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03 16:32                           ` peterz
2019-05-03 16:32                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 18:57                           ` torvalds
2019-05-03 18:57                             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06  8:19                             ` peterz [this message]
2019-05-06  8:19                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-06 13:56                               ` rostedt
2019-05-06 13:56                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-06 16:17                                 ` torvalds
2019-05-06 16:17                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 16:19                                   ` torvalds
2019-05-06 16:19                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 17:06                                   ` rostedt
2019-05-06 17:06                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-06 18:06                                     ` torvalds
2019-05-06 18:06                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 18:57                                       ` rostedt
2019-05-06 18:57                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-06 19:46                                         ` torvalds
2019-05-06 19:46                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 20:29                                           ` rostedt
2019-05-06 20:29                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-06 20:42                                             ` torvalds
2019-05-06 20:42                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 20:44                                               ` torvalds
2019-05-06 20:44                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 21:45                                               ` rostedt
2019-05-06 21:45                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-06 22:06                                                 ` torvalds
2019-05-06 22:06                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 22:31                                                   ` torvalds
2019-05-06 22:31                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07  0:10                                                     ` rostedt
2019-05-07  0:10                                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07  1:06                                                       ` torvalds
2019-05-07  1:06                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07  1:04                                                   ` rostedt
2019-05-07  1:04                                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07  1:34                                                     ` rostedt
2019-05-07  1:34                                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07  1:34                                                     ` torvalds
2019-05-07  1:34                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07  1:53                                                       ` rostedt
2019-05-07  1:53                                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07  2:22                                                         ` torvalds
2019-05-07  2:22                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07  2:58                                                           ` rostedt
2019-05-07  2:58                                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07  3:05                                                             ` torvalds
2019-05-07  3:05                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07  3:21                                                               ` rostedt
2019-05-07  3:21                                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07  3:28                                                                 ` torvalds
2019-05-07  3:28                                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07 14:54                                                                   ` torvalds
2019-05-07 14:54                                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07 15:12                                                                     ` rostedt
2019-05-07 15:12                                                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 15:25                                                                       ` rostedt
2019-05-07 15:25                                                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 16:25                                                                         ` rostedt
2019-05-07 16:25                                                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 15:31                                                                       ` torvalds
2019-05-07 15:31                                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07 15:45                                                                         ` rostedt
2019-05-07 15:45                                                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 16:34                                                                         ` peterz
2019-05-07 16:34                                                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07 17:08                                                                           ` torvalds
2019-05-07 17:08                                                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07 17:21                                                                             ` jpoimboe
2019-05-07 17:21                                                                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-07 21:24                                                                               ` rostedt
2019-05-07 21:24                                                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-08  4:50                                                                                 ` torvalds
2019-05-08  4:50                                                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-08 16:37                                                                                   ` rostedt
2019-05-08 16:37                                                                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:38                                                                             ` peterz
2019-05-07 17:38                                                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07  9:51                                                           ` peterz
2019-05-07  9:51                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07 14:48                                                           ` luto
2019-05-07 14:48                                                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-07 14:57                                                             ` torvalds
2019-05-07 14:57                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-07 14:13                                                 ` mhiramat
2019-05-07 14:13                                                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-07 17:15                                                   ` mhiramat
2019-05-07 17:15                                                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-06 14:22                               ` peterz
2019-05-06 14:22                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07  8:57                               ` peterz
2019-05-07  8:57                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07  9:18                                 ` David.Laight
2019-05-07  9:18                                   ` David Laight
2019-05-07 11:30                                   ` peterz
2019-05-07 11:30                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07 12:57                                     ` David.Laight
2019-05-07 12:57                                       ` David Laight
2019-05-07 13:14                                       ` rostedt
2019-05-07 13:14                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 14:50                                         ` David.Laight
2019-05-07 14:50                                           ` David Laight
2019-05-07 14:57                                           ` rostedt
2019-05-07 14:57                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 15:46                                             ` David.Laight
2019-05-07 15:46                                               ` David Laight
2019-05-07 13:32                                       ` peterz
2019-05-07 13:32                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07  9:27                                 ` peterz
2019-05-07  9:27                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07 12:27                                   ` rostedt
2019-05-07 12:27                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 12:41                                     ` peterz
2019-05-07 12:41                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-07 12:54                                       ` rostedt
2019-05-07 12:54                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-07 17:22                                         ` masami.hiramatsu
2019-05-07 17:22                                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-07 14:28                                 ` peterz
2019-05-07 14:28                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-02 20:48         ` rostedt
2019-05-02 20:48           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-06 15:14         ` jpoimboe
2019-05-06 15:14           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-01 20:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] ftrace/x86: Emulate call function while updating in breakpoint handler rostedt
2019-05-01 20:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-03 10:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 1.5/2] x86: Add int3_emulate_call() selftest peterz
2019-05-03 10:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 18:46   ` rostedt
2019-05-03 18:46     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190506081951.GJ2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).