From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4E1C3A5A6 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6243023403 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="hBpwGl91" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726805AbfH1RhK (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:37:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:34081 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727063AbfH1Rgd (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:36:33 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id b24so264509pfp.1 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UBNYDOQLiPHI747g3CvJSLTMKiFZvSX4+F+h+ZK0RGk=; b=hBpwGl91JHahbLFCmv2w1Mjzc7Oz3kRyNRNlfokM3jA96+3Z6siqSGJK3qXqEvZYXw 209fRwW977JPTkPz9WVu94EDq8zT1usK2FPzVbiynFtN99nMvFDHeFEXObaCht1TcFgd 4xrqVdOp6iVorPHpgxumzhQ/jyb1V//MFBv7E= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UBNYDOQLiPHI747g3CvJSLTMKiFZvSX4+F+h+ZK0RGk=; b=nT2hDs9s7VENnVO/zH2ABwvp4I+u71QY6CUkh85ffufYPKeb+yvyU3GS9AC9xVtool EbmBY17MlZBBsDWbAC3ip7qW+om76n7q/ToAWS5Td2yyfVvVPaqC6X7vOfrKUZSjB6BN ZT3NNpsH0cBTxFXPw3XQn0D7GzP8J4I55Nz39trP9rYFz6YbGi9P6eQphxtJWJTXGh6Y w7oNDFifoETxL4P9C1sixOwR2I7RLUfVKqEPlgT4d/fhMwU4SHJaGU4EhOM3L0QjcjRo ov7d9FHg2A3Tl5wmIFl1jDPiUxyVwS7As3AVprdTNUaddn2R+4UsDKxYUL1ltT9qvY78 xa7g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZ0/RpyTPB//qr5X7AZ8Eh57Zeqrmvtfdt9htkByJNm99eK9bX b+9LjK4JqWo27mhK3x7yDKKdW7txv6s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwkMj0PJ8taLffJ8W2JrcvATme98GQGJX0LS7TPTRiUEPTNp5IYu8fT7uFmLx8nEqHd37GDw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f0d8:: with SMTP id fa24mr5639027pjb.142.1567013792822; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m145sm5047005pfd.68.2019.08.28.10.36.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:48:34 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: David Abdurachmanov Cc: Tycho Andersen , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Oleg Nesterov , Andy Lutomirski , Will Drewry , Shuah Khan , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , David Abdurachmanov , Thomas Gleixner , Allison Randal , Alexios Zavras , Anup Patel , Vincent Chen , Alan Kao , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, me@carlosedp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: add support for SECCOMP and SECCOMP_FILTER Message-ID: <201908261043.08510F5E66@keescook> References: <20190822205533.4877-1-david.abdurachmanov@sifive.com> <20190826145756.GB4664@cisco> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:39:50AM -0700, David Abdurachmanov wrote: > I don't have the a build with SECCOMP for the board right now, so it > will have to wait. I just finished a new kernel (almost rc6) for Fedora, FWIW, I don't think this should block landing the code: all the tests fail without seccomp support. ;) So this patch is an improvement! -- Kees Cook