From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Add a test for the KVM_S390_MEM_OP ioctl
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:20:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829102050.26703-1-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
Check that we can write and read the guest memory with this s390x
ioctl, and that some error cases are handled correctly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
This test uses the ucall() interface, so this patch needs to be applied
on top of my "Implement ucall() for s390x" patch (which is not merged to
master yet)
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 156 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index 1b48a94b4350..62c591f87dab 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += clear_dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x = s390x/memop
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/sync_regs_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += kvm_create_max_vcpus
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..25b100d9fdda
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Test for s390x KVM_S390_MEM_OP
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019, Red Hat, Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+
+#define VCPU_ID 1
+
+static uint8_t mem1[65536];
+static uint8_t mem2[65536];
+
+static void guest_code(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(mem2); i++)
+ mem2[i] = mem1[i];
+ GUEST_SYNC(0);
+ }
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_run *run;
+ struct kvm_s390_mem_op ksmo;
+ int rv, i, maxsize;
+
+ setbuf(stdout, NULL); /* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
+
+ maxsize = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
+ if (!maxsize) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "CAP_S390_MEM_OP not supported -> skip test\n");
+ exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+ }
+ if (maxsize > sizeof(mem1))
+ maxsize = sizeof(mem1);
+
+ /* Create VM */
+ vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
+ run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(mem1); i++)
+ mem1[i] = i * i + i;
+
+ /* Set the first array */
+ ksmo.gaddr = addr_gva2gpa(vm, (uintptr_t)mem1);
+ ksmo.flags = 0;
+ ksmo.size = maxsize;
+ ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE;
+ ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.ar = 0;
+ vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+
+ /* Let the guest code copy the first array to the second */
+ vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC,
+ "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s)\n",
+ run->exit_reason,
+ exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
+
+ memset(mem2, 0xaa, sizeof(mem2));
+
+ /* Get the second array */
+ ksmo.gaddr = (uintptr_t)mem2;
+ ksmo.flags = 0;
+ ksmo.size = maxsize;
+ ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ;
+ ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem2;
+ ksmo.ar = 0;
+ vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(mem1, mem2, maxsize),
+ "Memory contents do not match!");
+
+ /* Check error conditions - first bad size: */
+ ksmo.gaddr = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.flags = 0;
+ ksmo.size = -1;
+ ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE;
+ ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.ar = 0;
+ rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == -1 && errno == E2BIG, "ioctl allows insane sizes");
+
+ /* Bad flags: */
+ ksmo.gaddr = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.flags = -1;
+ ksmo.size = maxsize;
+ ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE;
+ ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.ar = 0;
+ rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "ioctl allows all flags?");
+
+ /* Bad operation: */
+ ksmo.gaddr = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.flags = 0;
+ ksmo.size = maxsize;
+ ksmo.op = -1;
+ ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.ar = 0;
+ rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "ioctl allows all flags?");
+
+ /* Bad guest address: */
+ ksmo.gaddr = ~0xfffUL;
+ ksmo.flags = KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY;
+ ksmo.size = maxsize;
+ ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE;
+ ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.ar = 0;
+ rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv > 0, "ioctl does not report bad guest memory access");
+
+ /* Bad host address: */
+ ksmo.gaddr = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.flags = 0;
+ ksmo.size = maxsize;
+ ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE;
+ ksmo.buf = 0;
+ ksmo.ar = 0;
+ rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == -1 && errno == EFAULT,
+ "ioctl does not report bad host memory address");
+
+ /* Bad access register: */
+ run->psw_mask &= ~(3UL << (63 - 17));
+ run->psw_mask |= 1UL << (63 - 17); /* Enable AR mode */
+ vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); /* To sync new state to SIE block */
+ ksmo.gaddr = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.flags = 0;
+ ksmo.size = maxsize;
+ ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE;
+ ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1;
+ ksmo.ar = 17;
+ rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &ksmo);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "ioctl allows ARs > 15");
+ run->psw_mask &= ~(3UL << (63 - 17)); /* Disable AR mode */
+ vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); /* Run to sync new state */
+
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.18.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 10:20 Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-08-29 10:35 ` [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Add a test for the KVM_S390_MEM_OP ioctl Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190829102050.26703-1-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).