* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 32/76] selftests: kvm: do not try running the VM in vmx_set_nested_state_test
[not found] <20190829181311.7562-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2019-08-29 18:12 ` Sasha Levin
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 33/76] selftests: kvm: provide common function to enable eVMCS Sasha Levin
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-08-29 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Sasha Levin, kvm, linux-kselftest
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 92cd0f0be3d7adb63611c28693ec0399beded837 ]
This test is only covering various edge cases of the
KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE ioctl. Running the VM does not really
add anything.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
.../kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c | 15 ---------------
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c
index ed7218d166da6..a99fc66dafeb6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c
@@ -27,22 +27,13 @@
void test_nested_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_nested_state *state)
{
- volatile struct kvm_run *run;
-
vcpu_nested_state_set(vm, VCPU_ID, state, false);
- run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
- vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
- TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN,
- "Got exit_reason other than KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN: %u (%s),\n",
- run->exit_reason,
- exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
}
void test_nested_state_expect_errno(struct kvm_vm *vm,
struct kvm_nested_state *state,
int expected_errno)
{
- volatile struct kvm_run *run;
int rv;
rv = vcpu_nested_state_set(vm, VCPU_ID, state, true);
@@ -50,12 +41,6 @@ void test_nested_state_expect_errno(struct kvm_vm *vm,
"Expected %s (%d) from vcpu_nested_state_set but got rv: %i errno: %s (%d)",
strerror(expected_errno), expected_errno, rv, strerror(errno),
errno);
- run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
- vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
- TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN,
- "Got exit_reason other than KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN: %u (%s),\n",
- run->exit_reason,
- exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
}
void test_nested_state_expect_einval(struct kvm_vm *vm,
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 33/76] selftests: kvm: provide common function to enable eVMCS
[not found] <20190829181311.7562-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 32/76] selftests: kvm: do not try running the VM in vmx_set_nested_state_test Sasha Levin
@ 2019-08-29 18:12 ` Sasha Levin
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 34/76] selftests: kvm: fix vmx_set_nested_state_test Sasha Levin
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-08-29 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Sasha Levin, kvm, linux-kselftest
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 65efa61dc0d536d5f0602c33ee805a57cc07e9dc ]
There are two tests already enabling eVMCS and a third is coming.
Add a function that enables the capability and tests the result.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/evmcs.h | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
.../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/evmcs_test.c | 15 ++------------
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c | 12 ++++-------
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/evmcs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/evmcs.h
index 4059014d93ea1..4912d23844bc6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/evmcs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/evmcs.h
@@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ struct hv_enlightened_vmcs {
struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *current_evmcs;
struct hv_vp_assist_page *current_vp_assist;
+int vcpu_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vm *vm, int vcpu_id);
+
static inline int enable_vp_assist(uint64_t vp_assist_pa, void *vp_assist)
{
u64 val = (vp_assist_pa & HV_X64_MSR_VP_ASSIST_PAGE_ADDRESS_MASK) |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c
index fe56d159d65fd..52b6491ed7061 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/vmx.c
@@ -14,6 +14,26 @@
bool enable_evmcs;
+int vcpu_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vm *vm, int vcpu_id)
+{
+ uint16_t evmcs_ver;
+
+ struct kvm_enable_cap enable_evmcs_cap = {
+ .cap = KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS,
+ .args[0] = (unsigned long)&evmcs_ver
+ };
+
+ vcpu_ioctl(vm, vcpu_id, KVM_ENABLE_CAP, &enable_evmcs_cap);
+
+ /* KVM should return supported EVMCS version range */
+ TEST_ASSERT(((evmcs_ver >> 8) >= (evmcs_ver & 0xff)) &&
+ (evmcs_ver & 0xff) > 0,
+ "Incorrect EVMCS version range: %x:%x\n",
+ evmcs_ver & 0xff, evmcs_ver >> 8);
+
+ return evmcs_ver;
+}
+
/* Allocate memory regions for nested VMX tests.
*
* Input Args:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/evmcs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/evmcs_test.c
index 241919ef1eaca..9f250c39c9bb8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/evmcs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/evmcs_test.c
@@ -79,11 +79,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
struct kvm_x86_state *state;
struct ucall uc;
int stage;
- uint16_t evmcs_ver;
- struct kvm_enable_cap enable_evmcs_cap = {
- .cap = KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS,
- .args[0] = (unsigned long)&evmcs_ver
- };
/* Create VM */
vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
@@ -96,13 +91,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
exit(KSFT_SKIP);
}
- vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_ENABLE_CAP, &enable_evmcs_cap);
-
- /* KVM should return supported EVMCS version range */
- TEST_ASSERT(((evmcs_ver >> 8) >= (evmcs_ver & 0xff)) &&
- (evmcs_ver & 0xff) > 0,
- "Incorrect EVMCS version range: %x:%x\n",
- evmcs_ver & 0xff, evmcs_ver >> 8);
+ vcpu_enable_evmcs(vm, VCPU_ID);
run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
@@ -146,7 +135,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
kvm_vm_restart(vm, O_RDWR);
vm_vcpu_add(vm, VCPU_ID, 0, 0);
vcpu_set_cpuid(vm, VCPU_ID, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
- vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_ENABLE_CAP, &enable_evmcs_cap);
+ vcpu_enable_evmcs(vm, VCPU_ID);
vcpu_load_state(vm, VCPU_ID, state);
run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
free(state);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
index f72b3043db0eb..ee59831fbc984 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "test_util.h"
#include "kvm_util.h"
#include "processor.h"
+#include "vmx.h"
#define VCPU_ID 0
@@ -106,12 +107,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct kvm_vm *vm;
int rv;
- uint16_t evmcs_ver;
struct kvm_cpuid2 *hv_cpuid_entries;
- struct kvm_enable_cap enable_evmcs_cap = {
- .cap = KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS,
- .args[0] = (unsigned long)&evmcs_ver
- };
/* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
setbuf(stdout, NULL);
@@ -136,14 +132,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
free(hv_cpuid_entries);
- rv = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_ENABLE_CAP, &enable_evmcs_cap);
-
- if (rv) {
+ if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS)) {
fprintf(stderr,
"Enlightened VMCS is unsupported, skip related test\n");
goto vm_free;
}
+ vcpu_enable_evmcs(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
hv_cpuid_entries = kvm_get_supported_hv_cpuid(vm);
if (!hv_cpuid_entries)
return 1;
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 34/76] selftests: kvm: fix vmx_set_nested_state_test
[not found] <20190829181311.7562-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 32/76] selftests: kvm: do not try running the VM in vmx_set_nested_state_test Sasha Levin
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 33/76] selftests: kvm: provide common function to enable eVMCS Sasha Levin
@ 2019-08-29 18:12 ` Sasha Levin
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 63/76] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE Sasha Levin
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 64/76] selftests/kvm: make platform_info_test pass on AMD Sasha Levin
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-08-29 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Sasha Levin, kvm, linux-kselftest
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit c930e19790bbbff31c018009907c813fa0925f63 ]
vmx_set_nested_state_test is trying to use the KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS without
enabling enlightened VMCS first. Correct the outcome of the test, and actually
test that it succeeds after the capability is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
.../kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c
index a99fc66dafeb6..853e370e8a394 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
#define VMCS12_REVISION 0x11e57ed0
#define VCPU_ID 5
+bool have_evmcs;
+
void test_nested_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_nested_state *state)
{
vcpu_nested_state_set(vm, VCPU_ID, state, false);
@@ -75,8 +77,9 @@ void set_default_vmx_state(struct kvm_nested_state *state, int size)
{
memset(state, 0, size);
state->flags = KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE |
- KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING |
- KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS;
+ KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING;
+ if (have_evmcs)
+ state->flags |= KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS;
state->format = 0;
state->size = size;
state->hdr.vmx.vmxon_pa = 0x1000;
@@ -126,13 +129,19 @@ void test_vmx_nested_state(struct kvm_vm *vm)
/*
* Setting vmxon_pa == -1ull and vmcs_pa == -1ull exits early without
* setting the nested state but flags other than eVMCS must be clear.
+ * The eVMCS flag can be set if the enlightened VMCS capability has
+ * been enabled.
*/
set_default_vmx_state(state, state_sz);
state->hdr.vmx.vmxon_pa = -1ull;
state->hdr.vmx.vmcs12_pa = -1ull;
test_nested_state_expect_einval(vm, state);
- state->flags = KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS;
+ state->flags &= KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS;
+ if (have_evmcs) {
+ test_nested_state_expect_einval(vm, state);
+ vcpu_enable_evmcs(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ }
test_nested_state(vm, state);
/* It is invalid to have vmxon_pa == -1ull and SMM flags non-zero. */
@@ -217,6 +226,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
struct kvm_nested_state state;
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry = kvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry(1);
+ have_evmcs = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS);
+
if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE)) {
printf("KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE not available, skipping test\n");
exit(KSFT_SKIP);
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 63/76] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE
[not found] <20190829181311.7562-1-sashal@kernel.org>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 34/76] selftests: kvm: fix vmx_set_nested_state_test Sasha Levin
@ 2019-08-29 18:12 ` Sasha Levin
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 64/76] selftests/kvm: make platform_info_test pass on AMD Sasha Levin
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-08-29 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Sasha Levin, kvm, linux-kselftest
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 54577e5018a8c0cb79c9a0fa118a55c68715d398 ]
state_test and smm_test are failing on older processors that do not
have xcr0. This is because on those processor KVM does provide
support for KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE (to avoid having to rely on the older
KVM_GET/SET_FPU) but not for KVM_GET/SET_XCRS.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
index d2ad85fb01ac0..5f1ba3da2dbd3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
@@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ struct kvm_x86_state *vcpu_save_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XSAVE, r: %i",
r);
- r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
- TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i",
- r);
+ if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) {
+ r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i",
+ r);
+ }
r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_SREGS, &state->sregs);
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_SREGS, r: %i",
@@ -1102,9 +1104,11 @@ void vcpu_load_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_x86_state *s
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XSAVE, r: %i",
r);
- r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
- TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i",
- r);
+ if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) {
+ r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i",
+ r);
+ }
r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_SREGS, &state->sregs);
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_SREGS, r: %i",
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 64/76] selftests/kvm: make platform_info_test pass on AMD
[not found] <20190829181311.7562-1-sashal@kernel.org>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-08-29 18:12 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 63/76] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE Sasha Levin
@ 2019-08-29 18:12 ` Sasha Levin
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-08-29 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov, Paolo Bonzini, Sasha Levin, kvm, linux-kselftest
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit e4427372398c31f57450565de277f861a4db5b3b ]
test_msr_platform_info_disabled() generates EXIT_SHUTDOWN but VMCB state
is undefined after that so an attempt to launch this guest again from
test_msr_platform_info_enabled() fails. Reorder the tests to make test
pass.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/platform_info_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/platform_info_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/platform_info_test.c
index 40050e44ec0ac..f9334bd3cce9f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/platform_info_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/platform_info_test.c
@@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
msr_platform_info = vcpu_get_msr(vm, VCPU_ID, MSR_PLATFORM_INFO);
vcpu_set_msr(vm, VCPU_ID, MSR_PLATFORM_INFO,
msr_platform_info | MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_MAX_TURBO_RATIO);
- test_msr_platform_info_disabled(vm);
test_msr_platform_info_enabled(vm);
+ test_msr_platform_info_disabled(vm);
vcpu_set_msr(vm, VCPU_ID, MSR_PLATFORM_INFO, msr_platform_info);
kvm_vm_free(vm);
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread