From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504E9C3A5A3 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CEB2339E for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:27:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567103263; bh=xZ797pCM1tLIzZS874oxi5NFfTKdvU9VX9OBr3G4RuE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=fP0Qh9HJnbuJiKM3nUmNH2u4zyOfZzz+jmUhMBbNIdZW3Wwsu+sxhr72mKrdxLt7h 6RgiUDwYtbpY7GhhIMI5PY8t6LVEhZhlGXlJE+vBJpPEdjV4j7T9D6dpDcxts6FKi0 14PeSgjRFotGUerYGZjzB5R8TDQvk9yDVKcccJRc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728463AbfH2SPZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:15:25 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57096 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729216AbfH2SPW (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:15:22 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9FB823405; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:15:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567102521; bh=xZ797pCM1tLIzZS874oxi5NFfTKdvU9VX9OBr3G4RuE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=U3tnSUA0O2q1Cj+T8u/OHFEJ1TH+mA/jsmO7VFxICH+vICQcdyO0fQn0HcUPFrjh6 lCl4QuwuqfZv/ZNI62UIQUdrnnqvQ4nW8KFP1xQOG4AVlg9etVQMJjq5/VWPArnX0h XekDhGP97sJebplOXcBGCkKfDrn3H8OWhYA5Dwgw= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Sasha Levin , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 63/76] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:12:58 -0400 Message-Id: <20190829181311.7562-63-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190829181311.7562-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190829181311.7562-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org From: Paolo Bonzini [ Upstream commit 54577e5018a8c0cb79c9a0fa118a55c68715d398 ] state_test and smm_test are failing on older processors that do not have xcr0. This is because on those processor KVM does provide support for KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE (to avoid having to rely on the older KVM_GET/SET_FPU) but not for KVM_GET/SET_XCRS. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c index d2ad85fb01ac0..5f1ba3da2dbd3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c @@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ struct kvm_x86_state *vcpu_save_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid) TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XSAVE, r: %i", r); - r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i", - r); + if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) { + r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i", + r); + } r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_SREGS, &state->sregs); TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_SREGS, r: %i", @@ -1102,9 +1104,11 @@ void vcpu_load_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_x86_state *s TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XSAVE, r: %i", r); - r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i", - r); + if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) { + r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i", + r); + } r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_SREGS, &state->sregs); TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_SREGS, r: %i", -- 2.20.1