linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	amit.kachhap@arm.com, andreyknvl@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:48:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904114836.GV27757@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902112932.36129-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:26pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add a simple mangle testcase which messes with the ucontext_t from within
> the signal handler, trying to set the PSTATE SSBS bit.
> Expect SIGILL if SSBS feature is unsupported or that, on test PASS, the
> value set in PSTATE.SSBS in the signal frame is preserved by sigreturn.
> 
> Additionally, in order to support this test specific needs:
> - extend signal testing framework to allow the definition of a custom per
>   test initialization function to be run at the end of test setup.
> - introduced a set_regval() helper to set system register values in a
>   toolchain independent way.
> - introduce also a new common utility function: get_current_context()
>   which can be used to grab a ucontext without the help of libc, and
>   detect if such ucontext has been actively used to jump back into it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---
> v3 --> v4
> - fix commit message
> - missing include signal.h
> - added .init per-test init-func
> - added set_regval() helper
> - added SSBS clear to 0 custom .init function
> - removed volatile qualifier associated with sig_atomic_t data
> - added dsb inside handler to ensure the writes related to the
>   grabbed ucontext have completed
> - added test description
> ---
>  .../selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h     | 20 +++-
>  .../arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c         | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h         |  2 +
>  .../testcases/mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs.c       | 69 +++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h
> index a1cf69997604..0767e27fbe78 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@
>  	: "memory");					\
>  }
>  
> +#define set_regval(regname, in)				\
> +{							\
> +	asm volatile("msr " __stringify(regname) ", %0" \
> +	:						\
> +	: "r" (in)					\
> +	: "memory");					\
> +}
> +
>  /* Regs encoding and masks naming copied in from sysreg.h */
>  #define SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1	S3_0_C0_C7_1	/* MRS Emulated */
>  #define SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1	S3_0_C0_C7_2	/* MRS Emulated */
> @@ -89,12 +97,16 @@ struct tdescr {
>  	/* optional sa_flags for the installed handler */
>  	int		sa_flags;
>  	ucontext_t	saved_uc;
> -
> -	/* a custom setup function to be called before test starts */
> +	/* used by get_current_ctx() */
> +	size_t		live_sz;
> +	ucontext_t	*live_uc;
> +	sig_atomic_t	live_uc_valid;
> +	/* a custom setup: called alternatively to default_setup */
>  	int (*setup)(struct tdescr *td);
> +	/* a custom init: called by default test initialization */
> +	void (*init)(struct tdescr *td);
>  	/* a custom cleanup function called before test exits */
>  	void (*cleanup)(struct tdescr *td);
> -
>  	/* an optional function to be used as a trigger for test starting */
>  	int (*trigger)(struct tdescr *td);
>  	/*
> @@ -102,10 +114,8 @@ struct tdescr {
>  	 * presence of the trigger function above; this is mandatory
>  	 */
>  	int (*run)(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc);
> -
>  	/* an optional function for custom results' processing */
>  	void (*check_result)(struct tdescr *td);
> -
>  	void *priv;
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> index e2a5f37e6ad3..c6fdcb23f246 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> @@ -11,12 +11,16 @@
>  #include <linux/auxvec.h>
>  #include <ucontext.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
> +
>  #include "test_signals.h"
>  #include "test_signals_utils.h"
>  #include "testcases/testcases.h"
>  
>  extern struct tdescr *current;
>  
> +static int sig_copyctx = SIGUSR2;
> +
>  static char *feats_store[FMAX_END] = {
>  	" SSBS ",
>  	" PAN ",
> @@ -43,6 +47,81 @@ static inline char *feats_to_string(unsigned long feats)
>  	return feats_string;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Obtaining a valid and full-blown ucontext_t from userspace is tricky:
> + * libc getcontext does() not save all the regs and messes with some of
> + * them (pstate value in particular is not reliable).
> + * Here we use a service signal to grab the ucontext_t from inside a
> + * dedicated signal handler, since there, it is populated by Kernel
> + * itself in setup_sigframe(). The grabbed context is then stored and
> + * made available in td->live_uc.
> + *
> + * Anyway this function really serves a dual purpose:
> + *
> + * 1. grab a valid sigcontext into td->live_uc for result analysis: in
> + * such case it returns 1.
> + *
> + * 2. detect if somehow a previously grabbed live_uc context has been
> + * used actively with a sigreturn: in such a case the execution would have
> + * magically resumed in the middle of the function itself (seen_already==1):
> + * in such a case return 0, since in fact we have not just simply grabbed
> + * the context.
> + *
> + * This latter case is useful to detect when a fake_sigreturn test-case has
> + * unexpectedly survived without hittig a SEGV.
> + */
> +bool get_current_context(struct tdescr *td, ucontext_t *dest_uc)
> +{
> +	static sig_atomic_t seen_already;
> +
> +	assert(td && dest_uc);
> +	/* it's a genuine invocation..reinit */
> +	seen_already = 0;
> +	td->live_uc_valid = 0;
> +	td->live_sz = sizeof(*dest_uc);
> +	memset(dest_uc, 0x00, td->live_sz);
> +	td->live_uc = dest_uc;
> +	/*
> +	 * Grab ucontext_t triggering a signal...
> +	 * ASM equivalent of raise(sig_copyctx);
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that:
> +	 * - live_uc_valid is declared sig_atomic_t in struct tdescr
> +	 *   since it will be changed inside the sig_copyctx handler
> +	 * - the kill() syscall invocation returns only after any possible
> +	 *   registered signal handler for the invoked signal has returned,
> +	 *   so that live_uc_valid flag is surely up to date when this
> +	 *   function return it.
> +	 * - the additional 'memory' clobber is there to avoid possible
> +	 *   compiler's assumption on live_uc_valid, seen-already and
> +	 *   the content pointed by dest_uc, which are all changed inside
> +	 *   the signal handler, without resorting to the volatile qualifier
> +	 *   (and keeping quiet checkpatch.pl)
> +	 */
> +	asm volatile ("mov x8, %0\n\t"
> +		      "svc #0\n\t"
> +		      "mov x1, %1\n\t"
> +		      "mov x8, %2\n\t"
> +		      "svc #0"
> +		      :
> +		      : "i" (__NR_getpid), "r" (sig_copyctx), "i" (__NR_kill)
> +		      : "x1", "x8", "x0", "memory");
> +	/*
> +	 * If we get here with seen_already==1 it implies the td->live_uc
> +	 * context has been used to get back here....this probably means
> +	 * a test has failed to cause a SEGV...anyway the live_uc has not
> +	 * just been acquired...so return 0
> +	 */
> +	if (seen_already) {
> +		fprintf(stdout,
> +			"Successful sigreturn detected: live_uc is stale !\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +	seen_already = 1;
> +
> +	return td->live_uc_valid;
> +}
> +
>  static void unblock_signal(int signum)
>  {
>  	sigset_t sset;
> @@ -124,6 +203,17 @@ static void default_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *uc)
>  		 * to terminate immediately exiting straight away
>  		 */
>  		default_result(current, 1);
> +	} else if (signum == sig_copyctx && current->live_uc) {
> +		memcpy(current->live_uc, uc, current->live_sz);
> +		ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(current->live_uc);
> +		current->live_uc_valid = 1;
> +		/*
> +		 * Ensure above writes have completed before signal
> +		 * handler terminates
> +		 */
> +		asm volatile ("dsb sy" ::: "memory");

The dsb doesn't help here: this has no effect on how the compiler caches
variables in registers etc.

Overall, I think some details need a bit of a rethink here.

We need some way to ensure coherency of accesses to variables around
and inside the signal handler here, but since we're running in a single
thread that may be interrupted by a signal handler (running in the same
thread), it's compiler<->compiler coherency that's the issue here, not
cpu<->cpu or cpu<->device coherency.

There may also be atomicity concerns, since the compiler might move
stuff across and/or duplicate or tear reads/writes around the asm where
the signal is delivered.

The classic solution to these problems is to use volatile, but this
is a blunt tool and you often end up having to mark more objects
volatile than you really want to in order to ensure correctness.  The
ordering behaviour of accesses to volatiles is also ill-specified for
accesses made in different threads.

That said, efficiency is of no concern here and we're single-threaded,
so a blunt, simple tool may still be adequate.


Another issue is that nothing stops the stack frame the captured SP
points to from disappearing between get_current_context() and the
fake_sigreturn() that tries to jump back to it.

To avoid this issue, we'd probably need to inline more of
get_current_context(), i.e., turn it into a macro.


> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +			"GOOD CONTEXT grabbed from sig_copyctx handler\n");
>  	} else {
>  		if (signum == current->sig_unsupp && !are_feats_ok(current)) {
>  			fprintf(stderr,
> @@ -222,7 +312,15 @@ static int test_init(struct tdescr *td)
>  			!feats_ok ? "NOT " : "");
>  	}
>  
> +	if (td->sig_trig == sig_copyctx)
> +		sig_copyctx = SIGUSR1;
> +	unblock_signal(sig_copyctx);
> +
> +	/* Perform test specific additional initialization */
> +	if (td->init)
> +		td->init(td);
>  	td->initialized = 1;
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> index 8658d1a7d4b9..ce35be8ebc8e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> @@ -10,4 +10,6 @@ int test_setup(struct tdescr *td);
>  void test_cleanup(struct tdescr *td);
>  int test_run(struct tdescr *td);
>  void test_result(struct tdescr *td);
> +
> +bool get_current_context(struct tdescr *td, ucontext_t *dest_uc);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..15e6f62512d5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited
> + *
> + * Try to mangle the ucontext from inside a signal handler, setting the
> + * SSBS bit to 1 and veryfing that such modification is preserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <signal.h>
> +#include <ucontext.h>
> +
> +#include "test_signals_utils.h"
> +#include "testcases.h"
> +
> +static void mangle_invalid_pstate_ssbs_init(struct tdescr *td)
> +{
> +	fprintf(stderr, "Clearing SSBS to 0\n");
> +	set_regval(SSBS_SYSREG, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int mangle_invalid_pstate_ssbs_run(struct tdescr *td,
> +					  siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc)
> +{
> +	ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(uc);
> +
> +	/* set bit value */
> +	uc->uc_mcontext.pstate |= PSR_SSBS_BIT;

Can we check that uc->uc_mcontext.pstate & PSR_SSBS_BIT is initially 0?

If not, it suggests either a test bug, or modification of the SSBS
flag by other C code before the test signal was delivered.

> +	fprintf(stderr, "SSBS set to 1 -- PSTATE: 0x%016llX\n",
> +		uc->uc_mcontext.pstate);
> +	/* Save after mangling...it should be preserved */
> +	td->saved_uc = *uc;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void pstate_ssbs_bit_checks(struct tdescr *td)
> +{
> +	uint64_t val = 0;
> +	ucontext_t uc;
> +
> +	/* This check reports some result even if MRS SSBS unsupported */
> +	if (get_current_context(td, &uc))
> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +			"INFO: live_uc - got PSTATE: 0x%016llX -> SSBS %s\n",
> +			uc.uc_mcontext.pstate,
> +			(td->saved_uc.uc_mcontext.pstate & PSR_SSBS_BIT) ==
> +			(uc.uc_mcontext.pstate & PSR_SSBS_BIT) ?
> +			"PRESERVED" : "CLEARED");
> +
> +	fprintf(stderr, "Checking with MRS SSBS...\n");
> +	get_regval(SSBS_SYSREG, val);
> +	fprintf(stderr, "INFO: MRS SSBS - got: 0x%016lX\n", val);
> +	/* pass when preserved */
> +	td->pass = (val & PSR_SSBS_BIT) ==
> +		   (td->saved_uc.uc_mcontext.pstate & PSR_SSBS_BIT);
> +}
> +
> +struct tdescr tde = {
> +		.sanity_disabled = true,
> +		.name = "MANGLE_PSTATE_SSBS_REGS",
> +		.descr = "Mangling uc_mcontext changing SSBS.(PRESERVE)",

Can we come up with a clearer description here?  I'm not sure how to
read this.

[...]

Cheers
---Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-02 11:29 [PATCH v5 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] kselftest: arm64: add skeleton Makefile Cristian Marussi
2019-09-03  9:26   ` Amit Kachhap
2019-09-03  9:45     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-05 17:57     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-09 12:42       ` Amit Kachhap
2019-09-16 11:41         ` Dave Martin
2019-09-04 11:47   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-05 13:45     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-05 14:18       ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] kselftest: arm64: add common utils and one testcase Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:47   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-06 10:26     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-16 11:40       ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:48   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el[123][ht] Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:48   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:48   ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-09-09 15:51     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:48   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-09 17:31     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size_for_magic0 Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:49   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-09 17:47     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:49   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-09 17:51     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:49   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-05 12:15     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-05 12:39       ` Dave Martin
2019-09-05 13:32         ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-05 14:20           ` Dave Martin
2019-09-09 18:03     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:49   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-09 18:11     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:49   ` Dave Martin
2019-09-09 18:32     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 11:47 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Dave Martin
2019-09-10 12:25   ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-16 12:14     ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190904114836.GV27757@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).