From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 13/52] selftests/bpf: fix "bind{4, 6} deny specific IP & port" on s390
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:59:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904160004.3671-13-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190904160004.3671-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 27df5c7068bf23cab282dc64b1c9894429b3b8a0 ]
"bind4 allow specific IP & port" and "bind6 deny specific IP & port"
fail on s390 because of endianness issue: the 4 IP address bytes are
loaded as a word and compared with a constant, but the value of this
constant should be different on big- and little- endian machines, which
is not the case right now.
Use __bpf_constant_ntohl to generate proper value based on machine
endianness.
Fixes: 1d436885b23b ("selftests/bpf: Selftest for sys_bind post-hooks.")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index b8ebe2f580741..e9567122070a3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
+#include "bpf_endian.h"
#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
#include "bpf_util.h"
@@ -231,7 +232,8 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip6[3])),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x01000000, 4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+ __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x00000001), 4),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x2001, 2),
@@ -260,7 +262,8 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4)),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x0100007F, 4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+ __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x7F000001), 4),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x1002, 2),
--
2.20.1
parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20190904160004.3671-1-sashal@kernel.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904160004.3671-13-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).