From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F533C10F14 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673F620B7C for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726131AbfJJO1s (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:27:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48286 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726007AbfJJO1r (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:27:47 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65690AC11; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:27:44 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Shuah Khan , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , automated-testing@yoctoproject.org, kernelci@groups.io, syzkaller Subject: Re: [Automated-testing] syzkaller reproducers Message-ID: <20191010142744.GA10083@rei.lan> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hi! > We discussed collecting and uploading all syzkaller reproducers > somewhere. You wanted to see how they look. I've uploaded all current > reproducers here: > https://github.com/dvyukov/syzkaller-repros > Minimalistic build/run scripts are included. What is the reason behind statically linking the reproducers? The difference between static and dynamic binary is a bit less than 4MB, which gives difference of several gigabytes for the whole repo. This amount of binary data would complicate and slow down any CI significantly... -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz