[PATCH 17/19] selftests/vm: run_vmtests: invoke gup_benchmark with basic FOLL_PIN coverage

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Mike Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/19] selftests/vm: run_vmtests: invoke gup_benchmark with basic FOLL_PIN coverage
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:49:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191030224930.3990755-18-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030224930.3990755-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>

It's good to have basic unit test coverage of the new FOLL_PIN
behavior. Fortunately, the gup_benchmark unit test is extremely
fast (a few milliseconds), so adding it the the run_vmtests suite
is going to cause no noticeable change in running time.

So, add two new invocations to run_vmtests:

1) Run gup_benchmark with normal get_user_pages().

2) Run gup_benchmark with pin_user_pages(). This is much like
the first call, except that it sets FOLL_PIN.

Running these two in quick succession also provide a visual
comparison of the running times, which is convenient.

The new invocations are fairly early in the run_vmtests script,
because with test suites, it's usually preferable to put the
shorter, faster tests first, all other things being equal.

Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
index 951c507a27f7..93e8dc9a7cad 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
@@ -104,6 +104,28 @@ echo "NOTE: The above hugetlb tests provide minimal coverage.  Use"
 echo "      https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs.git for"
 echo "      hugetlb regression testing."
 
+echo "--------------------------------------------"
+echo "running 'gup_benchmark -U' (normal/slow gup)"
+echo "--------------------------------------------"
+./gup_benchmark -U
+if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	echo "[FAIL]"
+	exitcode=1
+else
+	echo "[PASS]"
+fi
+
+echo "------------------------------------------"
+echo "running gup_benchmark -c (pin_user_pages)"
+echo "------------------------------------------"
+./gup_benchmark -c
+if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	echo "[FAIL]"
+	exitcode=1
+else
+	echo "[PASS]"
+fi
+
 echo "-------------------"
 echo "running userfaultfd"
 echo "-------------------"
-- 
2.23.0

