From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE686C33CB1 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AC92072B for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=Mellanox.com header.i=@Mellanox.com header.b="t6+6HO04" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726014AbgANMuo (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:50:44 -0500 Received: from mail-eopbgr60084.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.6.84]:63174 "EHLO EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725994AbgANMun (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:50:43 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=C7XUEtCloHtSh0XzjJPY2iuHjI/dhgoU+50rOU+MjKhBL9YZedHQHh+bJyiy3WUBghtfYxWfH1Pd+/cmHrZ9Dw9R0WYS1mIatwjNssxU/FFeEz+ATUOubgnAzwR/ViMPZT98/qwLwCdYCkBj5277UQN+vFyiOFQQt4u2WytkN19awJT28OPg08a3HohZaHRefJQ5dhUpCPJctQg71b+sA6JyOOUcBQDhEy0YeY5U+BwFcBt3H2ndPQsdZ8LhNvnRS9YEBicy5tF8Q9fFgSThCC5hJL3licZW6nd2pPorXrE4p7K59+BW/6ttbZo8k+Cq049SROQdRmi/9p12SevsTQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=eTtqHBu2VdjbylevMt0AQNQF7yVbZgiL0JygfOIc/ow=; b=EfjbB7pZ2aeSZaWxbzqJ0TH3k35TC/EnBq09wuA238o8efcU5hnLLdtLJLfwX0CdKnqI0HJUzsIrakb1IUHjvu2xoLBpkdoIE0JolaF58uAg4v2HZbg87jFR1HEwI8m0A4WIAVIc9JJyxpuQyn2A4WQ8RpRzhFHJ/gLvqkYr3n18BFLvmkT88fxDZ5nsJ1DCCMmIYntVR1fCnfMFqfysCzrXeReiXk1Slpw9jCwArBKROsq2G/cKU/OdcFvTNjMCy0vfUCyrfBSF4knikKgZg7OY0jltXMk6qFzT9awtPCizWIqhG65Up+QRBXiMp72PkDKBvmrmOCm1QPXxXONhrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mellanox.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=mellanox.com; dkim=pass header.d=mellanox.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Mellanox.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=eTtqHBu2VdjbylevMt0AQNQF7yVbZgiL0JygfOIc/ow=; b=t6+6HO04qDyRQ5hwG+vtXMeXLVdbrqxyngOimnwCJqC7scs6CNqtkFVSzjbOPuVufrDY4u7/xIR0wpNhNeoMRwoRrA4228peXtk7o0sRcO2QCH5hBbIQ1cM3xXjGzWLC873yg+5MCuHGc5ux3GtkO7licSq0T27WUI+2OcjAt7Y= Received: from VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.133.14.15) by VI1PR05MB5200.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.178.12.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2623.13; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:49:59 +0000 Received: from VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1c00:7925:d5c6:d60d]) by VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1c00:7925:d5c6:d60d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2623.017; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:49:59 +0000 Received: from mlx.ziepe.ca (142.68.57.212) by BL0PR02CA0048.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:207:3d::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2623.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:49:58 +0000 Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1irLds-0005sv-3m; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:49:56 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Ralph Campbell CC: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , Jerome Glisse , John Hubbard , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Ben Skeggs , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/mmu_notifier: add mmu_interval_notifier_find() Thread-Topic: [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/mmu_notifier: add mmu_interval_notifier_find() Thread-Index: AQHVymNoKcMh6TMtf0C4WlvfajKIrqfqHXcA Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:49:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20200114124956.GN20978@mellanox.com> References: <20200113224703.5917-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com> <20200113224703.5917-5-rcampbell@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20200113224703.5917-5-rcampbell@nvidia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BL0PR02CA0048.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:207:3d::25) To VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:44::15) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jgg@mellanox.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [142.68.57.212] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 816823df-e936-45cc-bc69-08d798f04399 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR05MB5200: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 028256169F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(2906002)(52116002)(33656002)(71200400001)(54906003)(316002)(5660300002)(86362001)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(6916009)(66946007)(478600001)(7416002)(186003)(66556008)(26005)(9746002)(9786002)(2616005)(36756003)(4326008)(81156014)(81166006)(8936002)(8676002)(1076003)(24400500001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:VI1PR05MB5200;H:VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: mellanox.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: Mellanox.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 816823df-e936-45cc-bc69-08d798f04399 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Jan 2020 12:49:59.2035 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a652971c-7d2e-4d9b-a6a4-d149256f461b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: DE0G0UmX7vB/BR4k73qcS1UNsyhjOIZdtt6cjRV+P72ONGUYS/pQ1P2LCptAAzf5z4mJVdeRGhfyBRIADWbCsQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR05MB5200 Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 02:47:01PM -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote: > diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c > index 47ad9cc89aab..4efecc0f13cb 100644 > +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c > @@ -1171,6 +1171,39 @@ void mmu_interval_notifier_update(struct mmu_inter= val_notifier *mni, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmu_interval_notifier_update); > =20 > +struct mmu_interval_notifier *mmu_interval_notifier_find(struct mm_struc= t *mm, > + const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops *ops, > + unsigned long start, unsigned long last) > +{ > + struct mmu_notifier_mm *mmn_mm =3D mm->mmu_notifier_mm; > + struct interval_tree_node *node; > + struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni; > + struct mmu_interval_notifier *res =3D NULL; > + > + spin_lock(&mmn_mm->lock); > + node =3D interval_tree_iter_first(&mmn_mm->itree, start, last); > + if (node) { > + mni =3D container_of(node, struct mmu_interval_notifier, > + interval_tree); > + while (true) { > + if (mni->ops =3D=3D ops) { > + res =3D mni; > + break; > + } > + node =3D interval_tree_iter_next(&mni->interval_tree, > + start, last); > + if (!node) > + break; > + mni =3D container_of(node, struct mmu_interval_notifier, > + interval_tree); > + } > + } > + spin_unlock(&mmn_mm->lock); This doesn't seem safe at all, here we are returning a pointer to memory from the interval tree with out any kind of lifetime protection. If the interval tree is read it must be left in the read lock state until the caller is done with the pointer. .. and this poses all sorts of questions about consistency with items on the deferred list. Should find return an item undergoing deletion? Should find return items using the old interval tree values or their new updated values? Jason