From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
"linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: RFC - kernel selftest result documentation (KTAP)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:44:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006151142.8B78AAE7D2@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR13MB11752A5C1586F3D597C52679FD9C0@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:45:28PM +0000, Bird, Tim wrote:
> Personally, as a human I find the space prefix a bit easier to read.
> However, I think that in "normal" kernel log output it is unusual for
> a line to be prefixed with a hash (#), so this might be easier to
> both visually distinguish and for automated parsing.
> So I'm torn. I don't have a strong opinion on space vs. hash prefix
> for indicating sub-test. I think the KUnit convention of matching
> whatever was the prefix of the "TAP version 14" line is clever, but
> it would be nice to just pick a prefix and be done with it.
Are there plans in kernelci for doing any parsing of subtests? (As in,
what do we break if we move from "# " to " "?)
I'm really thinking " " makes sense now. :)
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-15 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 18:11 RFC - kernel selftest result documentation (KTAP) Bird, Tim
2020-06-13 5:07 ` David Gow
2020-06-15 17:34 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-16 20:03 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-16 20:37 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-17 0:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-19 19:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-19 18:17 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-14 18:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-15 17:45 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-15 18:44 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-14 18:39 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-15 19:07 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-16 12:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-16 16:42 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-16 19:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-16 20:30 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-16 23:58 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-19 18:47 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-19 19:11 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-19 22:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-20 14:51 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-19 18:33 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-19 17:58 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-20 6:44 ` David Gow
2020-06-20 15:03 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-23 2:58 ` David Gow
2020-06-16 23:52 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-19 18:52 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-19 19:50 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-19 19:49 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-16 20:48 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-16 21:16 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-16 21:19 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-17 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-17 2:30 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-17 3:36 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-17 4:05 ` David Gow
2020-06-19 19:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-19 20:19 ` Frank Rowand
2020-06-19 23:47 ` Bird, Tim
2020-06-19 19:39 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-19 17:13 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202006151142.8B78AAE7D2@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vitor@massaru.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).