From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 4/9] x86/pks: Preserve the PKRS MSR on context switch
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:48:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019184849.GC3713473@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019093714.GI2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:37:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:14:10PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > so it either needs to
> > > explicitly do so, or have an assertion that preemption is indeed
> > > disabled.
> >
> > However, I don't think I understand clearly. Doesn't [get|put]_cpu_ptr()
> > handle the preempt_disable() for us?
>
> It does.
>
> > Is it not sufficient to rely on that?
>
> It is.
>
> > Dave's comment seems to be the opposite where we need to eliminate preempt
> > disable before calling write_pkrs().
> >
> > FWIW I think I'm mistaken in my response to Dave regarding the
> > preempt_disable() in pks_update_protection().
>
> Dave's concern is that we're calling with with preemption already
> disabled so disabling it again is superfluous.
Ok, thanks, and after getting my head straight I think I agree with him, and
you.
Thanks I've reworked the code to removed the superfluous calls. Sorry about
being so dense... :-D
Ira
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-09 19:42 [PATCH RFC V3 0/9] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support RFC v3 ira.weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 1/9] x86/pkeys: Create pkeys_common.h ira.weiny
2020-10-13 17:46 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-13 19:44 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 2/9] x86/fpu: Refactor arch_set_user_pkey_access() for PKS support ira.weiny
2020-10-13 17:50 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-13 23:56 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-16 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17 3:32 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 3/9] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:23 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14 2:08 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 4/9] x86/pks: Preserve the PKRS MSR on context switch ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:31 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14 22:36 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-16 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17 5:14 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-19 18:48 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2020-10-16 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17 5:37 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 5/9] x86/pks: Add PKS kernel API ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:43 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15 1:08 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-16 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17 5:42 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 6/9] x86/entry: Pass irqentry_state_t by reference ira.weiny
2020-10-16 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-16 12:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-19 5:37 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19 9:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-19 20:26 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-20 14:10 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 7/9] x86/entry: Preserve PKRS MSR across exceptions ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:52 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15 3:46 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-15 4:06 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15 4:18 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 8/9] x86/fault: Report the PKRS state on fault ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:56 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15 4:13 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 9/9] x86/pks: Add PKS test code ira.weiny
2020-10-13 19:02 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15 4:46 ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 20:18 ` [PATCH RFC V3 0/9] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support RFC v3 Ira Weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201019184849.GC3713473@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).