From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84568C388F7 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40415224D1 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2439401AbgJTXvj (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:51:39 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:11172 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2439386AbgJTXvi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:51:38 -0400 IronPort-SDR: btX0oEPhJSc8spxAYl2KzOX9o9lQndrgNkmW/pdE/hmnXTrnA23b0QmQx7ByI9Kmb/0rYbxZmT WpedWoVN9ZXQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9780"; a="231486359" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,399,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="231486359" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Oct 2020 16:51:31 -0700 IronPort-SDR: GZhf/SJEjG338i/Gnxvsbhmhqh7s1dJfNMmF2b1xaxjQyefwUqlRzi17lbf2BPJ2GOpWA/4Fsa iTBFHBzbpYdQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,399,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="320833836" Received: from otcwcpicx6.sc.intel.com ([172.25.55.29]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2020 16:51:30 -0700 From: Fenghua Yu To: "Shuah Khan" , "Reinette Chatre" , "Tony Luck" , "Babu Moger" , "James Morse" , "Borislav Petkov" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Ravi V Shankar" Cc: "linux-kselftest" , "linux-kernel" , Fenghua Yu Subject: [PATCH v3 08/21] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:51:13 +0000 Message-Id: <20201020235126.1871815-9-fenghua.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.0 In-Reply-To: <20201020235126.1871815-1-fenghua.yu@intel.com> References: <20201020235126.1871815-1-fenghua.yu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org From: Reinette Chatre The resctrl tests can accept a CPU on which the tests are run and use default of CPU #1 if it is not provided. In the CAT test a "sibling CPU" is determined that is from the same package where another thread will be run. The current algorithm with which a "sibling CPU" is determined does not take the provided/default CPU into account and when that CPU is the first CPU in a package then the "sibling CPU" will be selected to be the same CPU since it starts by picking the first CPU from core_siblings_list. Fix the "sibling CPU" selection by taking the provided/default CPU into account and ensuring a sibling that is a different CPU is selected. Fixes: 78941183d1b1 ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) selftest") Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c index 67d775d03271..05956319d9ce 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ int get_core_sibling(int cpu_no) while (token) { sibling_cpu_no = atoi(token); /* Skipping core 0 as we don't want to run test on core 0 */ - if (sibling_cpu_no != 0) + if (sibling_cpu_no != 0 && sibling_cpu_no != cpu_no) break; token = strtok(NULL, "-,"); } -- 2.29.0