From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79437C55178 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EA7223AC for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="JhFDzd3J" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1768422AbgJZJsN (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 05:48:13 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47420 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1768410AbgJZJsN (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 05:48:13 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1603705691; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SlRTfCqLtyIBSnFe1uknaKbGad8itHiONy0aNY9FDgo=; b=JhFDzd3J++hEnEzoRBaqwNWv2fiLphklER9BPvVbuQwTMEi8uzeaOfKsoLXM2yLuyKcr5X I8nZTO8D3hFAHiJvimHHlxm7iJcufndpC0AhaJuxydfSsuznKUmN+cTRDJ0e1AHY6tM+zX yYbzVwgKoyxVx+rXolhn++ggmuAvh8A= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CBEB2CB; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:48:10 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>, Brendan Higgins , Shuah Khan , Andy Shevchenko , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Rasmus Villemoes , Alexandre Belloni , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Randy Dunlap , Ilya Dryomov , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib: Convert test_printf.c to KUnit Message-ID: <20201026094810.GJ32486@alley> References: <20201022151349.47436-1-98.arpi@gmail.com> <20201023173108.GG32486@alley> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Sun 2020-10-25 14:38:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 2:07 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Thu 2020-10-22 20:43:49, Arpitha Raghunandan wrote: > > > Convert test lib/test_printf.c to KUnit. More information about > > ... > > > > not ok 1 - printf-kunit-test > > > > > --- a/lib/test_printf.c > > > +++ b/lib/printf_kunit.c > > > > There is no standard at the moment. > > JFYI: from v5.10-rc1 it is expected to have documentation clarifying > the naming scheme. Also there is a pending series [1] to move KUnit > based test cases to the defined schema. > > > Please, either unify names of all the above modules or keep test_printf.c > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201016110836.52613-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/ Great, thanks for the pointer. I seems that this patch actually follows the proposed naming schema. I am fine with it then. Best Regards, Petr