linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/8] selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace test
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:54:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210913125505.52619-3-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210913125505.52619-1-broonie@kernel.org>

Currently we log the creation of the child process as a test but it's not
really relevant to what we're trying to test and can make the output a
little confusing so don't do that.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
index 7f7ed1c96867..7035f01423b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 
 #include "../../kselftest.h"
 
-#define EXPECTED_TESTS 20
+#define EXPECTED_TESTS 19
 
 /* <linux/elf.h> and <sys/auxv.h> don't like each other, so: */
 #ifndef NT_ARM_SVE
@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@ static int do_parent(pid_t child)
 		if (WIFEXITED(status) || WIFSIGNALED(status))
 			ksft_exit_fail_msg("Child died unexpectedly\n");
 
-		ksft_test_result(WIFSTOPPED(status), "WIFSTOPPED(%d)\n",
-				 status);
 		if (!WIFSTOPPED(status))
 			goto error;
 
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-13 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-13 12:54 [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to be run Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register sets Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function Mark Brown
2021-09-29 17:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210913125505.52619-3-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).