From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Maíra Canal" <maira.canal@usp.br>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
"Matt Johnston" <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:36:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202206181950.qNG3jcE8-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220618090310.1174932-2-davidgow@google.com>
Hi David,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to mcgrof/modules-next joel-aspeed/for-next ulf-hansson-mmc-mirror/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Gow/Rework-KUnit-test-execution-in-modules/20220618-170653
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 4b35035bcf80ddb47c0112c4fbd84a63a2836a18
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220618/202206181950.qNG3jcE8-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/14ff6ae01a41e301f1409874dd5aa38f73bc96f5
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review David-Gow/Rework-KUnit-test-execution-in-modules/20220618-170653
git checkout 14ff6ae01a41e301f1409874dd5aa38f73bc96f5
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.3.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash lib/kunit/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_module_init':
>> lib/kunit/test.c:618:28: error: 'struct module' has no member named 'num_kunit_suites'
618 | for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++)
| ^~
>> lib/kunit/test.c:619:45: error: 'struct module' has no member named 'kunit_suites'
619 | __kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites[i]);
| ^~
lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_module_exit':
lib/kunit/test.c:626:28: error: 'struct module' has no member named 'num_kunit_suites'
626 | for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++)
| ^~
lib/kunit/test.c:627:45: error: 'struct module' has no member named 'kunit_suites'
627 | __kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites[i]);
| ^~
vim +618 lib/kunit/test.c
612
613 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
614 static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod)
615 {
616 unsigned int i;
617
> 618 for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++)
> 619 __kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites[i]);
620 }
621
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-18 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-18 9:03 [PATCH 0/5] Rework KUnit test execution in modules David Gow
2022-06-18 9:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions David Gow
2022-06-18 11:36 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-06-18 12:47 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-18 9:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites David Gow
2022-06-18 13:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-18 14:49 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-18 9:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] thunderbolt: test: Use kunit_test_suite() macro David Gow
2022-06-20 5:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-06-18 9:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] nitro_enclaves: " David Gow
2022-06-20 9:26 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
2022-06-18 9:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: " David Gow
2022-06-18 17:11 ` [PATCH 0/5] Rework KUnit test execution in modules Maíra Canal
2022-06-18 17:41 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202206181950.qNG3jcE8-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andraprs@amazon.com \
--cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=maira.canal@usp.br \
--cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).