linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
	Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Maíra Canal" <maira.canal@usp.br>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
	"Matt Johnston" <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions
Date: Sat,  9 Jul 2022 11:19:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220709032001.819487-2-davidgow@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220709032001.819487-1-davidgow@google.com>

From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>

Currently, KUnit runs built-in tests and tests loaded from modules
differently. For built-in tests, the kunit_test_suite{,s}() macro adds a
list of suites in the .kunit_test_suites linker section. However, for
kernel modules, a module_init() function is used to run the test suites.

This causes problems if tests are included in a module which already
defines module_init/exit_module functions, as they'll conflict with the
kunit-provided ones.

This change removes the kunit-defined module inits, and instead parses
the kunit tests from their own section in the module. After module init,
we call __kunit_test_suites_init() on the contents of that section,
which prepares and runs the suite.

This essentially unifies the module- and non-module kunit init formats.

Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---

Changes since v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220625050838.1618469-2-davidgow@google.com/
- Rebase on top of the TAINT_TEST patch series. This should now apply
  cleanly on top of the kunit branch:
  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220708044847.531566-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u
- Add Brendan's Reviewed-by tags.

No changes to this patch since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220621085345.603820-2-davidgow@google.com/

Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220618090310.1174932-2-davidgow@google.com/
- Fix a compile error with CONFIG_KUNIT=m (Thanks Christophe Leroy,
  kernel test robot)
- Add Maíra's Tested-by.

Changes since RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/101d12fc9250b7a445ff50a9e7a25cd74d0e16eb.camel@codeconstruct.com.au/
- I've basically just rebased it, tweaked some wording, and it made it
still compile when CONFIG_MODULES is not set.

---
 include/kunit/test.h   | 49 +++++----------------------------------
 include/linux/module.h |  5 ++++
 kernel/module/main.c   |  6 +++++
 lib/kunit/test.c       | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 7646d1bcf685..cb155d3da284 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -250,42 +250,9 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 }
 #endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
 
-#ifdef MODULE
-/**
- * kunit_test_suites_for_module() - used to register one or more
- *			 &struct kunit_suite with KUnit.
- *
- * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
- *
- * Registers @__suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
- * more information.
- *
- * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into
- * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins
- * the executor will manage execution.  So ensure we do not define
- * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering
- * suites via kunit_test_suites() below.
- */
-#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites)				\
-	static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void)			\
-	{								\
-		return __kunit_test_suites_init(__suites);		\
-	}								\
-	module_init(kunit_test_suites_init);				\
-									\
-	static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void)			\
-	{								\
-		return __kunit_test_suites_exit(__suites);		\
-	}								\
-	module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit)				\
-	MODULE_INFO(test, "Y");
-#else
-#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites)
-#endif /* MODULE */
-
 #define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...)		       \
+	MODULE_INFO(test, "Y");						       \
 	static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL };     \
-	kunit_test_suites_for_module(unique_array);			       \
 	static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites			       \
 	__used __section(".kunit_test_suites") = unique_array
 
@@ -295,16 +262,12 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
  *
  * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
  *
- * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
- * more information.
- *
- * When builtin,  KUnit tests are all run via executor; this is done
- * by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the .kunit_test_suites
- * ELF section.
+ * Registers @suites with the test framework.
+ * This is done by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the
+ * .kunit_test_suites ELF section.
  *
- * An alternative is to build the tests as a module.  Because modules do not
- * support multiple initcall()s, we need to initialize an array of suites for a
- * module.
+ * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via the executor at boot, and when
+ * built as a module, they run on module load.
  *
  */
 #define kunit_test_suites(__suites...)						\
diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index abd9fa916b7d..2490223c975d 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -505,6 +505,11 @@ struct module {
 	int num_static_call_sites;
 	struct static_call_site *static_call_sites;
 #endif
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
+	int num_kunit_suites;
+	struct kunit_suite ***kunit_suites;
+#endif
+
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
 	bool klp; /* Is this a livepatch module? */
diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
index fed58d30725d..4542db7cdf54 100644
--- a/kernel/module/main.c
+++ b/kernel/module/main.c
@@ -2087,6 +2087,12 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
 					      sizeof(*mod->static_call_sites),
 					      &mod->num_static_call_sites);
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT
+	mod->kunit_suites = section_objs(info, ".kunit_test_suites",
+					      sizeof(*mod->kunit_suites),
+					      &mod->num_kunit_suites);
+#endif
+
 	mod->extable = section_objs(info, "__ex_table",
 				    sizeof(*mod->extable), &mod->num_exentries);
 
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 8b11552dc215..246645eb3cef 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <kunit/test.h>
 #include <kunit/test-bug.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <linux/panic.h>
 #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
@@ -613,6 +614,49 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++)
+		__kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites[i]);
+}
+
+static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++)
+		__kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites[i]);
+}
+
+static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
+			       void *data)
+{
+	struct module *mod = data;
+
+	switch (val) {
+	case MODULE_STATE_LIVE:
+		kunit_module_init(mod);
+		break;
+	case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
+		kunit_module_exit(mod);
+		break;
+	case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
+	case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block kunit_mod_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = kunit_module_notify,
+	.priority = 0,
+};
+#endif
+
 struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params {
 	size_t n;
 	size_t size;
@@ -707,13 +751,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_cleanup);
 static int __init kunit_init(void)
 {
 	kunit_debugfs_init();
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+	return register_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb);
+#else
 	return 0;
+#endif
 }
 late_initcall(kunit_init);
 
 static void __exit kunit_exit(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+	unregister_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb);
+#endif
 	kunit_debugfs_cleanup();
 }
 module_exit(kunit_exit);
-- 
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-09  3:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-09  3:19 [PATCH v4 0/5] Rework KUnit test execution in modules David Gow
2022-07-09  3:19 ` David Gow [this message]
2022-08-11 13:49   ` [PATCH v4 1/5] kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-11 16:55     ` David Gow
2022-08-12  8:08       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-09  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites David Gow
2022-07-09  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] thunderbolt: test: Use kunit_test_suite() macro David Gow
2022-07-09  3:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] nitro_enclaves: " David Gow
2022-07-09  3:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: " David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220709032001.819487-2-davidgow@google.com \
    --to=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=andraprs@amazon.com \
    --cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=maira.canal@usp.br \
    --cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).