From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A037BC43334 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 03:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236159AbiGTD0Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2022 23:26:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58976 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234254AbiGTD0Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2022 23:26:24 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C2142AD5; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 26K3QCwg003120; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 05:26:12 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 05:26:12 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Pranith Kumar , Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , Ammar Faizi , David Laight , Mark Brown , Linus Torvalds , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nolibc: add preliminary self tests Message-ID: <20220720032612.GA3106@1wt.eu> References: <20220719214449.2520-1-w@1wt.eu> <20220719224947.GX1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220719224947.GX1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:49:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > But I do get "71 test(s) passed." when running on x86. I will let you > decide whether that constitutes all being well or indicates a bug in > the tests. ;-) Technically speaking both are possible, but one is more likely :-) > > The program can automatically modulate QEMU's return value on x86 when > > QEMU is run with the appropriate options, but for now I'm not using it > > as I felt like it didn't bring much value, and the output is more useful. > > That's debatable, and maybe some might want to use it in bisect scripts > > for example. It's too early to say IMHO. > > For the moment, grepping the output works. And perhaps indefinitely. That's my intuition as well, given that there will always be a bit of scripting around that anyway. > This series is now on the -rcu tree's "dev" branch. Thank you! > I got two almost > identical copies of patch 7, so I took the later of the two. Please let > me know if I guessed wrong. Oh you're right, I'm sorry about that. I adjusted one commit message late and failed to erase the previous one from the directory. In either case we really don't care but I thought that the one mentioning "stdlib" which is the term used in the test was better. Thanks again for your time, Willy