From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2A5C433FE for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229613AbiI3PN2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:13:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231546AbiI3PN1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:13:27 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C742E9E3; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88F66238F; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80030C433D6; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:13:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1664550805; bh=+Iv0NzKlgcI3YuZ72jkDhgpQgSqXaS755YKw8LTmiNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XkoFjbyO6CW1DbTlNWFGtVO9HyfAwNyqnM7bj0FCzAeVWV1wdElbRGHr9u4ID99V8 MhlQhz8bKq2Ir5c7GCTbzBVRDV99nc4nWLKsesOmqqugh8j3K6kvw185RHbjWB5Wws TF1/3B4nymXTjZnEO/iLHJFxi82VYWboEwUe5sXbABcuRkoKD8iBzG+uUWKPgwZzbn ZQNPsvZ5IE6P1Pqy+Br1Y05hlXEwQ6fH08cljj1EoNbQV1ePaQYRMRr4vAnE2/f20a fqvHcX8cUtelATR+IlJE8NXU+iLgF5JOMgHl8tEIH36V04asdi5xA7b/xXwmlae2NN eX/3++IfC2QJg== Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:13:22 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Ido Schimmel Cc: netdev@kapio-technology.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Vladimir Oltean , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Kurt Kanzenbach , Hauke Mehrtens , Woojung Huh , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Matthias Brugger , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , Jiri Pirko , Ivan Vecera , Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Shuah Khan , Russell King , Christian Marangi , Daniel Borkmann , Yuwei Wang , Petr Machata , Florent Fourcot , Hans Schultz , Joachim Wiberg , Amit Cohen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 0/9] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) Message-ID: <20220930081322.2835f41b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220928150256.115248-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20220929091036.3812327f@kernel.org> <12587604af1ed79be4d3a1607987483a@kapio-technology.com> <20220929112744.27cc969b@kernel.org> <20220930075204.608b6351@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:04:12 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:52:04AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:05:20 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > > You can see build issues on patchwork: > > > > Overall a helpful response, but that part you got wrong. > > > > Do not point people to patchwork checks, please. It will only encourage > > people to post stuff they haven't build tested themselves. > > > > It's documented: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html#running-all-the-builds-and-checks-locally-is-a-pain-can-i-post-my-patches-and-have-the-patchwork-bot-validate-them > > Did you read my reply? I specifically included this link so that you > won't tell me I'm encouraging people to build test their patches by > posting to netdev. Yeah, I noticed the link after, but I think my point stands. You show someone the patchwork checks and then at the end of the "also" section put a link on how it's not okay to abuse it. Not a clear enough instruction. *never* point people to the patchwork checks, *please*