From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A29C6FD1C for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231954AbjCYEbY (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2023 00:31:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42220 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231919AbjCYEbV (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2023 00:31:21 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA46819F14 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id e23-20020a25e717000000b00b66ab374ba1so3656390ybh.22 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:31:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; t=1679718675; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Poo0P8oQ4B8Rz+UE7IFFhX4GmiQM6xAOtDrDKrEFNJ4=; b=TGdGfEPHq5foESifnm1RGl+oqnWesFgXeKgGW3CxCel1xBl4KJZNq8Ofitt+GTclcW s0p62Xvcok2mEILqLMDYtOUT+TyLRW0iw0ATuNn9N+Ned9i5y2tCpT+z5+foRWZYHLbc K3TUjNS8gHR50barI+Kub0r9YCQDtJ4A/Uw6k+AMIpFpkMXdA411rV64+OQR98ApbrsF 8RrilYIx4NcceKvRN00mRXtw4zCwxM9++/OQP2PwMB1feeQeMwBOrswREoThfTy6eP85 d1mgETdzfOF8UY8ckVmDXuTwy9/yXG1JH/s7biSZg1tH0C4QgT9O77HFaIExM28n6xAX SEPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679718675; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Poo0P8oQ4B8Rz+UE7IFFhX4GmiQM6xAOtDrDKrEFNJ4=; b=a9DR7aQQRaLyfNphFraSMklWKypKDbTa1EEzi3o2mb89RfMbe8+hONx9+YsMwB/cfX fk29NdssqWkVqMh0R02hfR5p6ztBnqBnMSxfb22yARb0uvLD1BxI5gRrI8lQp8P7Cf8E fLR+K6znS/r2a223XAuYCNYhvbhk0s2Qff9Avz0ksqwbvG39GWWEQEvPCe1CpRnN+SBf 9+S7so6ZbtVPxgnuwB7SHOyo+8s3oa8yYwaVm1eY72yg5Cxxb6ylmDfci0dQptmUqZi1 UmQux+ZQgMRE/vKHp7nZRTueZ32f5HtmdgHRU5L37MiOlDV7VH7v4Gw7F/9rjxouzJXp O8CA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9c4PyAalXYNpW7pfG/rPliKv/WXlbU82FbECNE/IXFXiXlf2Vn4 Uz20rx+c6IB+N/FJ84GoAiBQjAbeix1zBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YENK3MeXLRY7cLlGwBrmfPDghrr6/boH+ZQmmvr5X2B/1OPe73sw2htg9LcNl3UgI1H8uKIjrjd2fRnA== X-Received: from slicestar.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:4f:4b78:c0a8:20a1]) (user=davidgow job=sendgmr) by 2002:a81:b286:0:b0:545:7b92:2890 with SMTP id q128-20020a81b286000000b005457b922890mr2123479ywh.7.1679718674890; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 12:31:02 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog Message-ID: <20230325043104.3761770-1-davidgow@google.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] KUnit device API proposal From: David Gow To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Matti Vaittinen , Maxime Ripard , Brendan Higgins , Stephen Boyd , Shuah Khan Cc: David Gow , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , Heikki Krogerus , Jonathan Cameron , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hi all, This is a follow-up to the conversation[1] about adding helpers to create a struct device for use in KUnit tests. At the moment, most tests are using root_device_register(), which doesn't quite fit, and a few are using platform_devices instead. This adds a KUnit-specific equivalent: kunit_device_register(), which creates a device which will be automatically cleaned up on test exit (such as, for example, if an assertion fails). It's also possible to unregister it earlier with kunit_device_unregister(). This can replace the root_device_register() users pretty comfortably, though doesn't resolve the issue with devm_ resources not being released properly as laid out in [2]. Updating the implementation here to use a 'kunit' bus should, I think, be reasonably straightforward. The first patch in the series is an in-progress implementation of a separate new 'kunit_defer()' API, upon which this device implementation is built. If the overall idea seems good, I'll make sure to add better tests/documentation, and patches converting existing tests to this API. Cheers, -- David [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/bad670ee135391eb902bd34b8bcbe777afabc7fd.1679474247.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230324123157.bbwvfq4gsxnlnfwb@houat/ --- David Gow (2): kunit: resource: Add kunit_defer() functionality kunit: Add APIs for managing devices include/kunit/device.h | 25 +++++++++ include/kunit/resource.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/Makefile | 1 + lib/kunit/device.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/resource.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 291 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/kunit/device.h create mode 100644 lib/kunit/device.c -- 2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog