Linux-kselftest Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] deterministic random testing
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:58:42 +0100
Message-ID: <24397a58-17cd-7238-488c-7a3346465ab8@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201026105927.GC4077@smile.fi.intel.com>

On 26/10/2020 11.59, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:48:38PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> This is a bit of a mixed bag.
>>
>> The background is that I have some sort() and list_sort() rework
>> planned, but as part of that series I want to extend their their test
>> suites somewhat to make sure I don't goof up - and I want to use lots
>> of random list lengths with random contents to increase the chance of
>> somebody eventually hitting "hey, sort() is broken when the length is
>> 3 less than a power of 2 and only the last two elements are out of
>> order". But when such a case is hit, it's vitally important that the
>> developer can reproduce the exact same test case, which means using a
>> deterministic sequence of random numbers.
>>
>> Since Petr noticed [1] the non-determinism in test_printf in
>> connection with Arpitha's work on rewriting it to kunit, this prompted
>> me to use test_printf as a first place to apply that principle, and
>> get the infrastructure in place that will avoid repeating the "module
>> parameter/seed the rnd_state/report the seed used" boilerplate in each
>> module.
>>
>> Shuah, assuming the kselftest_module.h changes are ok, I think it's
>> most natural if you carry these patches, though I'd be happy with any
>> other route as well.
> 
> Completely in favour of this.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Thanks.

> One note though. AFAIU the global variables are always being used in the
> modules that include the corresponding header. Otherwise we might have an extra
> warning(s). I believe you have compiled with W=1 to exclude other cases.

Yes, I unconditionally define the two new variables. gcc doesn't warn
about them being unused, since they are referenced from inside a

  if (0) {}

block. And when those references are the only ones, gcc is smart enough
to elide the static variables completely, so they don't even take up
space in .data (or .init.data) - you can verify by running nm on
test_printf.o and test_bitmap.o - the former has 'seed' and 'rnd_state'
symbols, the latter does not.

I did it that way to reduce the need for explicit preprocessor
conditionals inside C functions.

Rasmus

      reply index

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-25 21:48 Rasmus Villemoes
2020-10-25 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] prandom.h: add *_state variant of prandom_u32_max Rasmus Villemoes
2020-10-30 16:00   ` Petr Mladek
2020-10-25 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] kselftest_module.h: unconditionally expand the KSTM_MODULE_GLOBALS() macro Rasmus Villemoes
2020-10-30 16:02   ` Petr Mladek
2020-10-25 21:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] kselftest_module.h: add struct rnd_state and seed parameter Rasmus Villemoes
2020-10-30 16:23   ` Petr Mladek
2020-10-25 21:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] lib/test_printf.c: use deterministic sequence of random numbers Rasmus Villemoes
2020-10-30 16:26   ` Petr Mladek
2020-10-26 10:59 ` [PATCH 0/4] deterministic random testing Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-30 12:58   ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24397a58-17cd-7238-488c-7a3346465ab8@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=98.arpi@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-kselftest Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/0 linux-kselftest/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-kselftest linux-kselftest/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest \
		linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-kselftest

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git