From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, fweimer@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
linuxram@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mingo@redhat.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com, msuchanek@suse.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 00/23] selftests, powerpc, x86: Memory Protection Keys
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:02:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a14815c-b9cb-f5a5-630a-0bfb25356429@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1579265066.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/17/20 4:49 AM, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Memory protection keys enables an application to protect its address
> space from inadvertent access by its own code.
>
> This feature is now enabled on powerpc and has been available since
> 4.16-rc1. The patches move the selftests to arch neutral directory
> and enhance their test coverage.
>
> Tested on powerpc64 and x86_64 (Skylake-SP).
I also tested the series. The 64-bit binary works fine. But,
This is failing to build the x86 selftests:
make: *** No rule to make target 'protection_keys.c', needed by
'/home/daveh/linux/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys_32'. Stop.
I think you just forgot to remove the binary from the x86 Makefile.
Which reminds me: This removes the 32-bit binary. x86 32-bit binaries
exercise different paths than the 64-bit ones, so we like to have both.
Although it isn't *essential* it would really be nice to keep the
32-bit binary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-17 12:49 [PATCH v16 00/23] selftests, powerpc, x86: Memory Protection Keys Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 01/23] selftests/x86/pkeys: Move selftests to arch-neutral directory Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 02/23] selftests/vm: Rename all references to pkru to a generic name Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 03/23] selftests/vm: Move generic definitions to header file Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 04/23] selftests/vm: Move some definitions to arch-specific header Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 05/23] selftests/vm: Make gcc check arguments of sigsafe_printf() Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 06/23] selftests/vm: Typecast references to pkey register Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 07/23] selftests: vm: pkeys: Add helpers for pkey bits Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 08/23] selftests/vm: Fix pkey_disable_clear() Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 09/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix assertion in pkey_disable_set/clear() Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 10/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix alloc_random_pkey() to make it really random Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 11/23] selftests: vm: pkeys: Use the correct huge page size Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 12/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Introduce generic pkey abstractions Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 13/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Introduce powerpc support Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 14/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix number of reserved powerpc pkeys Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 15/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix assertion in test_pkey_alloc_exhaust() Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 16/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Improve checks to determine pkey support Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 17/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Associate key on a mapped page and detect access violation Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 18/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Associate key on a mapped page and detect write violation Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 19/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Detect write violation on a mapped access-denied-key page Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:49 ` [PATCH v16 20/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Introduce a sub-page allocator Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:50 ` [PATCH v16 21/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Test correct behaviour of pkey-0 Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:50 ` [PATCH v16 22/23] selftests/vm/pkeys: Override access right definitions on powerpc Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 12:50 ` [PATCH v16 23/23] selftests: vm: pkeys: Use the correct page size " Sandipan Das
2020-01-17 18:02 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2020-01-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v16 00/23] selftests, powerpc, x86: Memory Protection Keys Sandipan Das
2020-01-20 8:35 Sandipan Das
2020-01-22 18:45 ` Dave Hansen
2020-01-27 10:11 ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-27 15:42 ` Dave Hansen
2020-01-28 9:38 ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-29 9:56 ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-29 18:59 ` Dave Hansen
2020-01-30 6:19 ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30 9:20 ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-29 19:04 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a14815c-b9cb-f5a5-630a-0bfb25356429@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).