From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E8EC47404 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF82222C0 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:59:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570226370; bh=W73YLXhXs87A3g1korb/FdZux/uM+XbdVy58joNqtAw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=R87HVJ00g/YBBpvLxxHTYWk6HZQcl4nGLcZPr4OYs5tbV8BDS5lNzWjeoSssUEb73 JFo8GUonYcLMLpntkH1r0xbLtIgUYH8BDcRoo+62+AMpuSReuPHpaZphyFRWWjOYH1 pBhaenQ8eKOMvUfGKHsUAr3s4aEGZrV+g+patABs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388148AbfJDV72 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:59:28 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39944 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730131AbfJDV71 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:59:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-9-64-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.9.64.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2D2021D81; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:59:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570226366; bh=W73YLXhXs87A3g1korb/FdZux/uM+XbdVy58joNqtAw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=c7fOk7RUHivPSo4Br+sR7Ulb8toFXC/ZDyjo7M4McI2vK/fU2u5yUL6sgZqCG9/0N ojFH2VfZcCuNDqHBacwdU9j3hm2X7p3FAwv0T6qBCIoIakX+ukDWwwzuMnkOhquBaJ BRLuBCpyg/Pa+cLfW2XKs0phXp09dZr4S7bAKusM= Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework To: Linus Torvalds , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Brendan Higgins , Frank Rowand , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Josh Poimboeuf , Kees Cook , kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, Luis Chamberlain , Peter Zijlstra , robh@kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Masahiro Yamada , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , linux-nvdimm , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Sasha Levin , Tim.Bird@sony.com, Amir Goldstein , Dan Carpenter , Daniel Vetter , jdike@addtoit.com, Joel Stanley , Julia Lawall , khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, logang@deltatee.com, Michael Ellerman , Petr Mladek , Randy Dunlap , Richard Weinberger , David Rientjes , Steven Rostedt , wfg@linux.intel.com, shuah References: <20190923090249.127984-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20191004213812.GA24644@mit.edu> From: shuah Message-ID: <56e2e1a7-f8fe-765b-8452-1710b41895bf@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:59:10 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On 10/4/19 3:42 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 2:39 PM Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >> >> This question is primarily directed at Shuah and Linus.... >> >> What's the current status of the kunit series now that Brendan has >> moved it out of the top-level kunit directory as Linus has requested? > The move happened smack in the middle of merge window and landed in linux-next towards the end of the merge window. > We seemed to decide to just wait for 5.5, but there is nothing that > looks to block that. And I encouraged Shuah to find more kunit cases > for when it _does_ get merged. > Right. I communicated that to Brendan that we could work on adding more kunit based tests which would help get more mileage on the kunit. > So if the kunit branch is stable, and people want to start using it > for their unit tests, then I think that would be a good idea, and then > during the 5.5 merge window we'll not just get the infrastructure, > we'll get a few more users too and not just examples. > thanks, -- Shuah