From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8A1C433E0 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0D220835 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727900AbgERWOG (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 18:14:06 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:46561 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728187AbgERWOF (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 18:14:05 -0400 IronPort-SDR: TuQ8jM+7vX6DM96eeZDnsYG4wkDgz1sphHWkAlO5DMR2ngQur/Mn/7D+W/Fg4TrZa2TifPBzyO P7EZZ6sOdbEw== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 May 2020 15:14:04 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 4F1jBJOvWspkwsl6o0wHoHsf4buKogWvuR3qEHR+A5jDdP/umr2EedjLmzfO/v7d7P7EsPPyni JaXbIFHaf3kw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,407,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="411420476" Received: from sai-dev-mach.sc.intel.com ([143.183.140.153]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 May 2020 15:14:04 -0700 From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya To: shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com, james.morse@arm.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, dcb314@hotmail.com, Sai Praneeth Prakhya Subject: [PATCH V2 19/19] selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 15:08:39 -0700 Message-Id: <75653a26f64e19c5b87827b1cdfd7b8c95a3de31.1589835155.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Dan reported that he noticed following static checker warnings tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:545 measure_vals() warn: 'bw_imc' unsigned <= 0 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:549 measure_vals() warn: 'bw_resc_end' unsigned <= 0 These warnings are reported because 1. measure_vals() declares 'bw_imc' and 'bw_resc_end' as unsigned long variables 2. Return value of get_mem_bw_imc() and get_mem_bw_resctrl() are assigned to 'bw_imc' and 'bw_resc_end' respectively 3. The return values are checked for <=0 to see if the calls were successful or not Checking for < 0 for an unsigned value doesn't make any sense. So, to fix this issue, change the implementation of get_mem_bw_imc() and get_mem_bw_resctrl() such that they now accept reference to a variable and set the variable appropriately upon success and return 0, else return <0 on error. Fixes: 7f4d257e3a2a: "selftests/resctrl: Add callback to start a benchmark" Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 33 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c index 94f3a34e21bb..003457b16ce7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c @@ -300,9 +300,9 @@ static int initialize_mem_bw_imc(void) * Memory B/W utilized by a process on a socket can be calculated using * iMC counters. Perf events are used to read these counters. * - * Return: >= 0 on success. < 0 on failure. + * Return: = 0 on success. < 0 on failure. */ -static float get_mem_bw_imc(int cpu_no, char *bw_report) +static int get_mem_bw_imc(int cpu_no, char *bw_report, float *bw_imc) { float reads, writes, of_mul_read, of_mul_write; int imc, j, ret; @@ -374,12 +374,13 @@ static float get_mem_bw_imc(int cpu_no, char *bw_report) } if (strcmp(bw_report, "reads") == 0) - return reads; + *bw_imc = reads; if (strcmp(bw_report, "writes") == 0) - return writes; + *bw_imc = writes; - return (reads + writes); + *bw_imc = reads + writes; + return 0; } void set_mbm_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, int resource_id) @@ -438,9 +439,8 @@ static void initialize_mem_bw_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, * 1. If con_mon grp is given, then read from it * 2. If con_mon grp is not given, then read from root con_mon grp */ -static unsigned long get_mem_bw_resctrl(void) +static int get_mem_bw_resctrl(unsigned long *mbm_total) { - unsigned long mbm_total = 0; FILE *fp; fp = fopen(mbm_total_path, "r"); @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static unsigned long get_mem_bw_resctrl(void) return -1; } - if (fscanf(fp, "%lu", &mbm_total) <= 0) { + if (fscanf(fp, "%lu", mbm_total) <= 0) { perror("Could not get mbm local bytes"); fclose(fp); @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static unsigned long get_mem_bw_resctrl(void) } fclose(fp); - return mbm_total; + return 0; } pid_t bm_pid, ppid; @@ -549,7 +549,8 @@ static void initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, static int measure_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, unsigned long *bw_resc_start) { - unsigned long bw_imc, bw_resc, bw_resc_end; + unsigned long bw_resc, bw_resc_end; + float bw_imc; int ret; /* @@ -559,13 +560,13 @@ measure_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, unsigned long *bw_resc_start) * Compare the two values to validate resctrl value. * It takes 1sec to measure the data. */ - bw_imc = get_mem_bw_imc(param->cpu_no, param->bw_report); - if (bw_imc <= 0) - return bw_imc; + ret = get_mem_bw_imc(param->cpu_no, param->bw_report, &bw_imc); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; - bw_resc_end = get_mem_bw_resctrl(); - if (bw_resc_end <= 0) - return bw_resc_end; + ret = get_mem_bw_resctrl(&bw_resc_end); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; bw_resc = (bw_resc_end - *bw_resc_start) / MB; ret = print_results_bw(param->filename, bm_pid, bw_imc, bw_resc); -- 2.19.1