From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFBBC433ED for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FE161166 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234894AbhDOUyG (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:54:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38078 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234668AbhDOUyF (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:54:05 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A316C061574; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F299F304D; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:53:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net F299F304D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1618520022; bh=JGuBcDCsoY8Pewg+MBKqE6IyTEvd/cQVdVqhnNSiz9A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bR0V82w9Sp/671/R1C6VuDxdFy/+ZlHH3SaQaod/0bDnqrXai4BepcSfgJtxgApbr C55hqINDF08FSms5kZMJxww38zZuBKTIK1DgZvchF95I6v4IcZsBCy+DV7KxWqoZev ygaAg4JxqR6oZvVmeknlf+6ZqktqKzQmKTHKlzIwQQeoX3NZWiqAsZ8zBRFAzzzyPA iwFjkiIdN/hTFQWm35e+w2xMz9J3Y/tjQOjGgsXNI68BaJIbygUx80No4XyuElVdQW LP7Kehidg+8HY3E4fusmWT1+Ef+LnWfZAXp0LzQuQP4u79c1tjY837GQou4JgzEnCA /N60GfQrXVxig== From: Jonathan Corbet To: David Gow , Shuah Khan , Andrew Morton , Dmitry Vyukov , Marco Elver , Brendan Higgins , Daniel Latypov Cc: David Gow , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, KUnit Development , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: dev-tools: Add Testing Overview In-Reply-To: <20210415054036.581117-1-davidgow@google.com> References: <20210415054036.581117-1-davidgow@google.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:53:41 -0600 Message-ID: <877dl3i816.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org David Gow writes: > The kernel now has a number of testing and debugging tools, and we've > seen a bit of confusion about what the differences between them are. > > Add a basic documentation outlining the testing tools, when to use each, > and how they interact. > > This is a pretty quick overview rather than the idealised "kernel > testing guide" that'd probably be optimal, but given the number of times > questions like "When do you use KUnit and when do you use Kselftest?" > are being asked, it seemed worth at least having something. Hopefully > this can form the basis for more detailed documentation later. > > Signed-off-by: David Gow > Reviewed-by: Marco Elver > Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov > --- > > Thanks again. Assuming no-one has any objections, I think this is good > to go. I've applied it after fixing the conflict with docs-next. Thanks, jon