From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kcsan: test: Add a .kunitconfig to run KCSAN tests
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 21:08:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSmyApbC7en25ZBr7hLJye0mOnUY5ETR-VVEWmbaXq3bdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YoS6rthXi9VRXpkg@elver.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2896 bytes --]
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 5:21 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 03:32PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > Add a .kunitconfig file, which provides a default, working config for
> > running the KCSAN tests. Note that it needs to run on an SMP machine, so
> > to run under kunit_tool, the x86_64-smp qemu-based setup should be used:
> > ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64-smp --kunitconfig=kernel/kcsan
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>
> Thanks for adding this.
>
> > ---
> > kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig b/kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a8a815b1eb73
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +# Note that the KCSAN tests need to run on an SMP setup.
> > +# Under kunit_tool, this can be done by using the x86_64-smp
> > +# qemu-based architecture:
> > +# ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=kernel/kcsan --arch=x86_64-smp
> > +
> > +CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> > +
> > +CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
> > +
> > +CONFIG_KCSAN=y
> > +CONFIG_KCSAN_KUNIT_TEST=y
> > +
> > +# Needed for test_barrier_nothreads
> > +CONFIG_KCSAN_STRICT=y
> > +CONFIG_KCSAN_WEAK_MEMORY=y
>
> Note, KCSAN_STRICT implies KCSAN_WEAK_MEMORY.
>
> Also, a bunch of the test cases' outcomes depend on KCSAN's
> "strictness". I think to cover the various combinations would be too
> complex, but we can just settle on testing KCSAN_STRICT=y.
It's definitely possible to either have multiple .kunitconfigs, each
of which could have slightly different setups, e.g.:
- kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig (defualt)
- kernel/kcsan/strict.kunitconfig (passed explicitly when desired)
Equally, if we got rid of KCSAN_STRICT in the .kunitconfig, you could
override it with --kconfig_add, e.g.
- ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=kernel/kcsan
--arch=x86_64-smp
- ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=kernel/kcsan
--arch=x86_64-smp --kconfig_add CONFIG_KSCAN_STRICT=y
> The end result is the same, but you could drop the
> CONFIG_KCSAN_WEAK_MEMORY=y line, and let the latest KCSAN_STRICT
> defaults decide (I don't expect them to change any time soon).
>
> If you want it to be more explicit, it's also fine leaving the
> CONFIG_KCSAN_WEAK_MEMORY=y line in.
Do you have a preference here? Or to get rid of both and default to
the non-strict version mentioned above?
>
> > +# This prevents the test from timing out on many setups. Feel free to remove
> > +# (or alter) this, in conjunction with setting a different test timeout with,
> > +# for example, the --timeout kunit_tool option.
> > +CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS=100
> > --
> > 2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog
> >
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4003 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 7:32 [PATCH 1/2] kunit: tool: Add x86_64-smp architecture for SMP testing David Gow
2022-05-18 7:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] kcsan: test: Add a .kunitconfig to run KCSAN tests David Gow
2022-05-18 9:21 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-19 13:08 ` David Gow [this message]
2022-05-19 13:24 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-14 20:22 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-14 21:40 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-14 23:45 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-14 23:47 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-15 6:49 ` David Gow
2022-05-18 17:12 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-06 19:53 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-05-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] kunit: tool: Add x86_64-smp architecture for SMP testing Marco Elver
2022-05-18 15:31 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-05-18 15:35 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-18 15:39 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-05-18 17:05 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-05-19 13:15 ` David Gow
2022-05-19 17:11 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-06 19:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-07-06 19:44 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABVgOSmyApbC7en25ZBr7hLJye0mOnUY5ETR-VVEWmbaXq3bdQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).