linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: show list of valid --arch options when invalid
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:23:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSn7KpVj_+3YYrO1DkNxHkO3VJcUYjXuD+RSNHV_aZC6_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929232534.1433720-1-dlatypov@google.com>

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 7:26 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
>
> Consider this attempt to run KUnit in QEMU:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86
>
> Before you'd get this error message:
> kunit_kernel.ConfigError: x86 is not a valid arch
>
> After:
> kunit_kernel.ConfigError: x86 is not a valid arch, options are ['alpha', 'arm', 'arm64', 'i386', 'powerpc', 'riscv', 's390', 'sparc', 'x86_64']
>
> This should make it a bit easier for people to notice when they make
> typos, etc. Currently, one would have to dive into the python code to
> figure out what the valid set is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> ---

This is really nice, particularly given that we've had to reproduce
that list in lots of talks, documentation, etc. and it could get
out-of-date.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

[FYI: this didn't seem to apply cleanly to kselftest/kunit head, but
it was a pretty minor issue with kunit_tool_test.py.]

Thanks,
-- David

>  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py    | 5 +++--
>  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> index 1870e75ff153..a6b3cee3f0d0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> @@ -198,8 +198,9 @@ def get_source_tree_ops(arch: str, cross_compile: Optional[str]) -> LinuxSourceT
>                 return LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(cross_compile=cross_compile)
>         elif os.path.isfile(config_path):
>                 return get_source_tree_ops_from_qemu_config(config_path, cross_compile)[1]
> -       else:
> -               raise ConfigError(arch + ' is not a valid arch')
> +
> +       options = [f[:-3] for f in os.listdir(QEMU_CONFIGS_DIR) if f.endswith('.py')]
> +       raise ConfigError(arch + ' is not a valid arch, options are ' + str(sorted(options)))
>
>  def get_source_tree_ops_from_qemu_config(config_path: str,
>                                          cross_compile: Optional[str]) -> Tuple[
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> index cad37a98e599..2ae72f04cbe0 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> @@ -289,6 +289,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
>                                 pass
>                         kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir)
>
> +       def test_invalid_arch(self):
> +               with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'not a valid arch, options are.*x86_64'):
> +                       kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', arch='invalid')
> +
>         # TODO: add more test cases.
>
>
>
> base-commit: 865a0a8025ee0b54d1cc74834c57197d184a441e
> --
> 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29 23:25 [PATCH] kunit: tool: show list of valid --arch options when invalid Daniel Latypov
2021-09-30  0:23 ` David Gow [this message]
2021-09-30  0:31   ` Daniel Latypov
2021-10-05 21:27 ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABVgOSn7KpVj_+3YYrO1DkNxHkO3VJcUYjXuD+RSNHV_aZC6_Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).