Linux-kselftest Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests
@ 2020-01-23 18:46 Alan Maguire
  2020-01-23 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 1/3] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display Alan Maguire
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Maguire @ 2020-01-23 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, gregkh
  Cc: corbet, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	Alan Maguire

When kunit tests are run on native (i.e. non-UML) environments, the results
of test execution are often intermixed with dmesg output.  This patch
series attempts to solve this by providing a debugfs representation
of the results of the last test run, available as

/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results

In addition, we provide a way to re-run the tests and show results via

/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run

Changes since v1:
 - trimmed unneeded include files in lib/kunit/debugfs.c (Greg)
 - renamed global debugfs functions to be prefixed with kunit_ (Greg)
 - removed error checking for debugfs operations (Greg)

Alan Maguire (3):
  kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display
  kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results
  kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation

 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst |  19 +++++
 include/kunit/test.h                    |  21 +++--
 lib/kunit/Makefile                      |   3 +-
 lib/kunit/debugfs.c                     | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/debugfs.h                     |  16 ++++
 lib/kunit/test.c                        |  85 +++++++++++++++-----
 6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.c
 create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.h

-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 kunit-next 1/3] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display
  2020-01-23 18:46 [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Alan Maguire
@ 2020-01-23 18:46 ` Alan Maguire
  2020-01-31  2:23   ` Brendan Higgins
  2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 2/3] kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results Alan Maguire
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Maguire @ 2020-01-23 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, gregkh
  Cc: corbet, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	Alan Maguire

add debugfs support for displaying kunit test suite results; this is
especially useful for module-loaded tests to allow disentangling of
test result display from other dmesg events.

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
---
 include/kunit/test.h |  21 ++++++++---
 lib/kunit/Makefile   |   3 +-
 lib/kunit/debugfs.c  | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/debugfs.h  |  16 ++++++++
 lib/kunit/test.c     |  85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 5 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.c
 create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.h

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 2dfb550..37219b8a 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ struct kunit_case {
 	bool success;
 };
 
+#define	kunit_status2str(status)	(status ? "ok" : "not ok")
+
 /**
  * KUNIT_CASE - A helper for creating a &struct kunit_case
  *
@@ -157,6 +159,9 @@ struct kunit_suite {
 	int (*init)(struct kunit *test);
 	void (*exit)(struct kunit *test);
 	struct kunit_case *test_cases;
+
+	/* private - internal use only */
+	struct dentry *debugfs;
 };
 
 /**
@@ -197,6 +202,15 @@ struct kunit {
 
 int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
 
+size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite);
+
+unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite,
+				 struct kunit_case *test_case);
+
+int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite **suites);
+
+void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites);
+
 /**
  * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
  *			 with KUnit.
@@ -226,15 +240,12 @@ struct kunit {
 	static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL};	\
 	static int kunit_test_suites_init(void)				\
 	{								\
-		unsigned int i;						\
-		for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++)			\
-			kunit_run_tests(suites[i]);			\
-		return 0;						\
+		return __kunit_test_suites_init(suites);		\
 	}								\
 	late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init);				\
 	static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void)			\
 	{								\
-		return;							\
+		return __kunit_test_suites_exit(suites);		\
 	}								\
 	module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit)
 
diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile
index fab5564..869aab0 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
+++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) +=			kunit.o
 kunit-objs +=				test.o \
 					string-stream.o \
 					assert.o \
-					try-catch.o
+					try-catch.o \
+					debugfs.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		kunit-test.o
 
diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..578843c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates.
+ *    Author: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include "string-stream.h"
+
+#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT             "kunit"
+#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS          "results"
+
+/*
+ * Create a debugfs representation of test suites:
+ *
+ * Path						Semantics
+ * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results	Show results of last run for
+ *						testsuite
+ *
+ */
+
+static struct dentry *debugfs_rootdir;
+
+void kunit_debugfs_cleanup(void)
+{
+	debugfs_remove_recursive(debugfs_rootdir);
+}
+
+void kunit_debugfs_init(void)
+{
+	if (!debugfs_rootdir)
+		debugfs_rootdir = debugfs_create_dir(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT, NULL);
+}
+
+static void debugfs_print_result(struct seq_file *seq,
+				 struct kunit_suite *suite,
+				 struct kunit_case *test_case)
+{
+	if (!test_case)
+		return;
+
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t%s %d - %s\n", kunit_status2str(test_case->success),
+		   kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), test_case->name);
+}
+
+/*
+ * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results shows all results for testsuite.
+ */
+static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private;
+	struct kunit_case *test_case;
+
+	if (!suite)
+		return 0;
+
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name);
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t1..%zd\n", kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));
+
+	for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
+		debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int debugfs_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return single_release(inode, file);
+}
+
+static int debugfs_results_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *suite;
+
+	suite = (struct kunit_suite *)inode->i_private;
+
+	return single_open(file, debugfs_print_results, suite);
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
+	.open = debugfs_results_open,
+	.read = seq_read,
+	.llseek = seq_lseek,
+	.release = debugfs_release,
+};
+
+void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+{
+	/* First add /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite> */
+	suite->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(suite->name, debugfs_rootdir);
+
+	debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS, S_IFREG | 0444,
+			    suite->debugfs,
+			    suite, &debugfs_results_fops);
+}
+
+void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+{
+	debugfs_remove_recursive(suite->debugfs);
+}
diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.h b/lib/kunit/debugfs.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9a92d5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _KUNIT_DEBUGFS_H
+#define _KUNIT_DEBUGFS_H
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite);
+void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite);
+void kunit_debugfs_init(void);
+void kunit_debugfs_cleanup(void);
+
+#endif /* _KUNIT_DEBUGFS_H */
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 9242f93..07089ca 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
 
+#include "debugfs.h"
 #include "string-stream.h"
 #include "try-catch-impl.h"
 
@@ -28,22 +29,24 @@ static void kunit_print_tap_version(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static size_t kunit_test_cases_len(struct kunit_case *test_cases)
+size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
-	struct kunit_case *test_case;
+	struct kunit_case *test_case, *test_cases = suite->test_cases;
 	size_t len = 0;
 
-	for (test_case = test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
+	for (test_case = test_cases; test_case && test_case->run_case;
+	     test_case++)
 		len++;
 
 	return len;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
 
 static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	kunit_print_tap_version();
 	pr_info("\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name);
-	pr_info("\t1..%zd\n", kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases));
+	pr_info("\t1..%zd\n", kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));
 }
 
 static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent,
@@ -51,19 +54,15 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent,
 				  size_t test_number,
 				  const char *description)
 {
-	const char *indent, *ok_not_ok;
+	const char *indent;
 
 	if (should_indent)
 		indent = "\t";
 	else
 		indent = "";
 
-	if (is_ok)
-		ok_not_ok = "ok";
-	else
-		ok_not_ok = "not ok";
-
-	pr_info("%s%s %zd - %s\n", indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description);
+	pr_info("%s%s %zd - %s\n", indent, kunit_status2str(is_ok),
+		test_number, description);
 }
 
 static bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite)
@@ -87,14 +86,20 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 			      suite->name);
 }
 
-static void kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(struct kunit_case *test_case,
-					    size_t test_number)
+unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite,
+				 struct kunit_case *test_case)
 {
-	kunit_print_ok_not_ok(true,
-			      test_case->success,
-			      test_number,
-			      test_case->name);
+	struct kunit_case *tc;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 1, tc = suite->test_cases; tc->run_case; tc++, i++) {
+		if (tc == test_case)
+			return i;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_test_case_num);
 
 static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test,
 				      struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -102,6 +107,9 @@ static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test,
 	struct string_stream_fragment *fragment;
 	char *buf;
 
+	if (string_stream_is_empty(stream))
+		return;
+
 	buf = string_stream_get_string(stream);
 	if (!buf) {
 		kunit_err(test,
@@ -303,19 +311,20 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
 	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context);
 
 	test_case->success = test.success;
+
+	kunit_print_ok_not_ok(true, test_case->success,
+			      kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
+			      test_case->name);
 }
 
 int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	struct kunit_case *test_case;
-	size_t test_case_count = 1;
 
 	kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
 
-	for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) {
+	for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
 		kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case);
-		kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(test_case, test_case_count++);
-	}
 
 	kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
 
@@ -323,6 +332,37 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests);
 
+static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+{
+	kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite);
+}
+
+int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite **suites)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) {
+		kunit_init_suite(suites[i]);
+		kunit_run_tests(suites[i]);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_init);
+
+static void kunit_exit_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+{
+	kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(suite);
+}
+
+void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++)
+		kunit_exit_suite(suites[i]);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit);
+
 struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test,
 						    kunit_resource_init_t init,
 						    kunit_resource_free_t free,
@@ -489,12 +529,15 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
 
 static int __init kunit_init(void)
 {
+	kunit_debugfs_init();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 late_initcall(kunit_init);
 
 static void __exit kunit_exit(void)
 {
+	kunit_debugfs_cleanup();
 }
 module_exit(kunit_exit);
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 kunit-next 2/3] kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results
  2020-01-23 18:46 [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Alan Maguire
  2020-01-23 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 1/3] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display Alan Maguire
@ 2020-01-23 18:47 ` Alan Maguire
  2020-01-31  2:43   ` Brendan Higgins
  2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 3/3] kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation Alan Maguire
  2020-01-23 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Brendan Higgins
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Maguire @ 2020-01-23 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, gregkh
  Cc: corbet, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	Alan Maguire

Add /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/run file which will run the
specified suite and show results.

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
---
 lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
index 578843c..1ea3fbc 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
 #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT             "kunit"
 #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS          "results"
+#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN		"run"
 
 /*
  * Create a debugfs representation of test suites:
@@ -20,6 +21,7 @@
  * Path						Semantics
  * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results	Show results of last run for
  *						testsuite
+ * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run	Run testsuite and show results
  *
  */
 
@@ -67,6 +69,18 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run (re)runs suite and shows all results.
+ */
+static int debugfs_run_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private;
+
+	kunit_run_tests(suite);
+
+	return debugfs_print_results(seq, v);
+}
+
 static int debugfs_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	return single_release(inode, file);
@@ -88,6 +102,22 @@ static int debugfs_results_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	.release = debugfs_release,
 };
 
+static int debugfs_run_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *suite;
+
+	suite = (struct kunit_suite *)inode->i_private;
+
+	return single_open(file, debugfs_run_print_results, suite);
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations debugfs_run_fops = {
+	.open = debugfs_run_open,
+	.read = seq_read,
+	.llseek = seq_lseek,
+	.release = debugfs_release,
+};
+
 void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	/* First add /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite> */
@@ -96,6 +126,9 @@ void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 	debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS, S_IFREG | 0444,
 			    suite->debugfs,
 			    suite, &debugfs_results_fops);
+	debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN, S_IFREG | 0444,
+			    suite->debugfs,
+			    suite, &debugfs_run_fops);
 }
 
 void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 kunit-next 3/3] kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation
  2020-01-23 18:46 [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Alan Maguire
  2020-01-23 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 1/3] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display Alan Maguire
  2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 2/3] kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results Alan Maguire
@ 2020-01-23 18:47 ` Alan Maguire
  2020-01-31  2:51   ` Brendan Higgins
  2020-01-23 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Brendan Higgins
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Maguire @ 2020-01-23 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, gregkh
  Cc: corbet, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	Alan Maguire

Documentation should describe debugfs layout and semantics.

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
---
 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 7cd56a1..b05c843 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -590,3 +590,22 @@ able to run one test case per invocation.
 
 .. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture
    dependent KUnit test.
+
+KUnit debugfs representation
+============================
+When kunit test suites are initialized, they create an associated directory
+in /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test-suite>.  The directory contains two files
+
+- results: "cat results" displays results of last test run
+- run: "cat run" runs the test suite and displays the results
+
+Thus to re-run all currently loaded suites and display results, we can do this:
+
+```
+$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/*/run
+```
+
+The debugfs representation is primarily of use when kunit test suites are
+run in a native environment, either as modules or builtin.  Having a way
+to display results like this is valuable as otherwise results can be
+intermixed with other events in dmesg output.
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests
  2020-01-23 18:46 [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Alan Maguire
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 3/3] kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation Alan Maguire
@ 2020-01-23 22:24 ` Brendan Higgins
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2020-01-23 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Maguire, Luis Chamberlain
  Cc: Greg KH, Jonathan Corbet, open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK,
	KUnit Development, open list:DOCUMENTATION,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List

+Luis Chamberlain

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> When kunit tests are run on native (i.e. non-UML) environments, the results
> of test execution are often intermixed with dmesg output.  This patch
> series attempts to solve this by providing a debugfs representation
> of the results of the last test run, available as
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results
>
> In addition, we provide a way to re-run the tests and show results via
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run

Ooo, cool! I like this! I was actually thinking about doing something
similar after talking to either Shuah, or Luis, so this is great! I
think Luis will be interested in this regardless so I cc'ed him.

> Changes since v1:
>  - trimmed unneeded include files in lib/kunit/debugfs.c (Greg)
>  - renamed global debugfs functions to be prefixed with kunit_ (Greg)
>  - removed error checking for debugfs operations (Greg)
>
> Alan Maguire (3):
>   kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display
>   kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results
>   kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation
>
>  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst |  19 +++++
>  include/kunit/test.h                    |  21 +++--
>  lib/kunit/Makefile                      |   3 +-
>  lib/kunit/debugfs.c                     | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/kunit/debugfs.h                     |  16 ++++
>  lib/kunit/test.c                        |  85 +++++++++++++++-----
>  6 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.h
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 kunit-next 1/3] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display
  2020-01-23 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 1/3] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display Alan Maguire
@ 2020-01-31  2:23   ` Brendan Higgins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2020-01-31  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Maguire
  Cc: Greg KH, Jonathan Corbet, open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK,
	KUnit Development, open list:DOCUMENTATION,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List

Sorry for taking so long to get to this. It's been a busy couple of weeks.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> add debugfs support for displaying kunit test suite results; this is
> especially useful for module-loaded tests to allow disentangling of
> test result display from other dmesg events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/kunit/test.h |  21 ++++++++---
>  lib/kunit/Makefile   |   3 +-
>  lib/kunit/debugfs.c  | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/kunit/debugfs.h  |  16 ++++++++
>  lib/kunit/test.c     |  85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  5 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/debugfs.h
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 2dfb550..37219b8a 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ struct kunit_case {
>         bool success;
>  };
>
> +#define        kunit_status2str(status)        (status ? "ok" : "not ok")

nit: I would prefer kunit_status_to_string. Also, I would prefer this
as a static inline function.

>  /**
>   * KUNIT_CASE - A helper for creating a &struct kunit_case
>   *
> @@ -157,6 +159,9 @@ struct kunit_suite {
>         int (*init)(struct kunit *test);
>         void (*exit)(struct kunit *test);
>         struct kunit_case *test_cases;
> +
> +       /* private - internal use only */
> +       struct dentry *debugfs;
>  };
>
>  /**
> @@ -197,6 +202,15 @@ struct kunit {
>
>  int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
>
> +size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite);
> +
> +unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite,
> +                                struct kunit_case *test_case);
> +
> +int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite **suites);
> +
> +void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites);
> +
>  /**
>   * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
>   *                      with KUnit.
> @@ -226,15 +240,12 @@ struct kunit {
>         static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL};     \
>         static int kunit_test_suites_init(void)                         \
>         {                                                               \
> -               unsigned int i;                                         \
> -               for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++)                     \
> -                       kunit_run_tests(suites[i]);                     \
> -               return 0;                                               \
> +               return __kunit_test_suites_init(suites);                \
>         }                                                               \
>         late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init);                          \
>         static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void)                 \
>         {                                                               \
> -               return;                                                 \
> +               return __kunit_test_suites_exit(suites);                \
>         }                                                               \
>         module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile
> index fab5564..869aab0 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
> @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) +=                  kunit.o
>  kunit-objs +=                          test.o \
>                                         string-stream.o \
>                                         assert.o \
> -                                       try-catch.o
> +                                       try-catch.o \
> +                                       debugfs.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=            kunit-test.o
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..578843c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates.
> + *    Author: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +#include "string-stream.h"
> +
> +#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT             "kunit"
> +#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS          "results"
> +
> +/*
> + * Create a debugfs representation of test suites:
> + *
> + * Path                                                Semantics
> + * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results Show results of last run for
> + *                                             testsuite
> + *
> + */
> +
> +static struct dentry *debugfs_rootdir;
> +
> +void kunit_debugfs_cleanup(void)
> +{
> +       debugfs_remove_recursive(debugfs_rootdir);
> +}
> +
> +void kunit_debugfs_init(void)
> +{
> +       if (!debugfs_rootdir)
> +               debugfs_rootdir = debugfs_create_dir(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void debugfs_print_result(struct seq_file *seq,
> +                                struct kunit_suite *suite,
> +                                struct kunit_case *test_case)
> +{
> +       if (!test_case)
> +               return;
> +
> +       seq_printf(seq, "\t%s %d - %s\n", kunit_status2str(test_case->success),
> +                  kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), test_case->name);

Do you think we might want to collect info printed to
kunit_{info|warn|err}? I would think the expectation failure line at
least would be desirable, no?

> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results shows all results for testsuite.
> + */
> +static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private;
> +       struct kunit_case *test_case;
> +
> +       if (!suite)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       seq_printf(seq, "\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name);
> +       seq_printf(seq, "\t1..%zd\n", kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));

Is there any way to reuse the format strings/printing from test.c? It
would be nice if we didn't have to remember to update two printers.

> +
> +       for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
> +               debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int debugfs_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +       return single_release(inode, file);
> +}
> +
> +static int debugfs_results_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_suite *suite;
> +
> +       suite = (struct kunit_suite *)inode->i_private;
> +
> +       return single_open(file, debugfs_print_results, suite);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
> +       .open = debugfs_results_open,
> +       .read = seq_read,
> +       .llseek = seq_lseek,
> +       .release = debugfs_release,
> +};
> +
> +void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> +{
> +       /* First add /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite> */
> +       suite->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(suite->name, debugfs_rootdir);
> +
> +       debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS, S_IFREG | 0444,
> +                           suite->debugfs,
> +                           suite, &debugfs_results_fops);
> +}
> +
> +void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> +{
> +       debugfs_remove_recursive(suite->debugfs);
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.h b/lib/kunit/debugfs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9a92d5e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _KUNIT_DEBUGFS_H
> +#define _KUNIT_DEBUGFS_H
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite);
> +void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite);
> +void kunit_debugfs_init(void);
> +void kunit_debugfs_cleanup(void);
> +
> +#endif /* _KUNIT_DEBUGFS_H */
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index 9242f93..07089ca 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
>
> +#include "debugfs.h"
>  #include "string-stream.h"
>  #include "try-catch-impl.h"
>
> @@ -28,22 +29,24 @@ static void kunit_print_tap_version(void)
>         }
>  }
>
> -static size_t kunit_test_cases_len(struct kunit_case *test_cases)
> +size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
> -       struct kunit_case *test_case;
> +       struct kunit_case *test_case, *test_cases = suite->test_cases;
>         size_t len = 0;
>
> -       for (test_case = test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
> +       for (test_case = test_cases; test_case && test_case->run_case;
> +            test_case++)
>                 len++;
>
>         return len;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
>
>  static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>         kunit_print_tap_version();
>         pr_info("\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name);
> -       pr_info("\t1..%zd\n", kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases));
> +       pr_info("\t1..%zd\n", kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));
>  }
>
>  static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent,
> @@ -51,19 +54,15 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent,
>                                   size_t test_number,
>                                   const char *description)
>  {
> -       const char *indent, *ok_not_ok;
> +       const char *indent;
>
>         if (should_indent)
>                 indent = "\t";
>         else
>                 indent = "";
>
> -       if (is_ok)
> -               ok_not_ok = "ok";
> -       else
> -               ok_not_ok = "not ok";
> -
> -       pr_info("%s%s %zd - %s\n", indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description);
> +       pr_info("%s%s %zd - %s\n", indent, kunit_status2str(is_ok),
> +               test_number, description);
>  }
>
>  static bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> @@ -87,14 +86,20 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>                               suite->name);
>  }
>
> -static void kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(struct kunit_case *test_case,
> -                                           size_t test_number)
> +unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite,
> +                                struct kunit_case *test_case)
>  {
> -       kunit_print_ok_not_ok(true,
> -                             test_case->success,
> -                             test_number,
> -                             test_case->name);
> +       struct kunit_case *tc;
> +       unsigned int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 1, tc = suite->test_cases; tc->run_case; tc++, i++) {
> +               if (tc == test_case)
> +                       return i;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_test_case_num);
>
>  static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test,
>                                       struct string_stream *stream)
> @@ -102,6 +107,9 @@ static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test,
>         struct string_stream_fragment *fragment;
>         char *buf;
>
> +       if (string_stream_is_empty(stream))
> +               return;
> +
>         buf = string_stream_get_string(stream);
>         if (!buf) {
>                 kunit_err(test,
> @@ -303,19 +311,20 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
>         kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context);
>
>         test_case->success = test.success;
> +
> +       kunit_print_ok_not_ok(true, test_case->success,
> +                             kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
> +                             test_case->name);
>  }
>
>  int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>         struct kunit_case *test_case;
> -       size_t test_case_count = 1;
>
>         kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
>
> -       for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) {
> +       for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
>                 kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case);
> -               kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(test_case, test_case_count++);
> -       }
>
>         kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
>
> @@ -323,6 +332,37 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests);
>
> +static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> +{
> +       kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite);
> +}

It looks like this is only called in one place, can we just call
kunit_debugfs_create_suite directly?

> +
> +int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite **suites)
> +{
> +       unsigned int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) {
> +               kunit_init_suite(suites[i]);
> +               kunit_run_tests(suites[i]);
> +       }
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_init);
> +
> +static void kunit_exit_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> +{
> +       kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(suite);
> +}
> +
> +void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites)
> +{
> +       unsigned int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++)
> +               kunit_exit_suite(suites[i]);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit);
> +
>  struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test,
>                                                     kunit_resource_init_t init,
>                                                     kunit_resource_free_t free,
> @@ -489,12 +529,15 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
>
>  static int __init kunit_init(void)
>  {
> +       kunit_debugfs_init();
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>  late_initcall(kunit_init);
>
>  static void __exit kunit_exit(void)
>  {
> +       kunit_debugfs_cleanup();
>  }
>  module_exit(kunit_exit);
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 kunit-next 2/3] kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results
  2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 2/3] kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results Alan Maguire
@ 2020-01-31  2:43   ` Brendan Higgins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2020-01-31  2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Maguire
  Cc: Greg KH, Jonathan Corbet, open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK,
	KUnit Development, open list:DOCUMENTATION,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Add /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/run file which will run the
> specified suite and show results.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>

If you don't mind, I would like to see the device tree unit test from
Frank before we accept this patch. I definitely like your approach
here, but this would break with KUnit test cases which depend on
__init code and data. I just figure that it would be easier for us to
solve the __init problem now if we have a working example that uses it
rather than having someone who wants to write a test which depends on
__init having to fix this after the fact. Let me know if this is a
problem for you.

> ---
>  lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> index 578843c..1ea3fbc 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
>  #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT             "kunit"
>  #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS          "results"
> +#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN              "run"
>
>  /*
>   * Create a debugfs representation of test suites:
> @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@
>   * Path                                                Semantics
>   * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results Show results of last run for
>   *                                             testsuite
> + * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run     Run testsuite and show results
>   *
>   */
>
> @@ -67,6 +69,18 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run (re)runs suite and shows all results.
> + */
> +static int debugfs_run_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private;
> +
> +       kunit_run_tests(suite);
> +
> +       return debugfs_print_results(seq, v);
> +}
> +
>  static int debugfs_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>         return single_release(inode, file);
> @@ -88,6 +102,22 @@ static int debugfs_results_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>         .release = debugfs_release,
>  };
>
> +static int debugfs_run_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_suite *suite;
> +
> +       suite = (struct kunit_suite *)inode->i_private;
> +
> +       return single_open(file, debugfs_run_print_results, suite);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations debugfs_run_fops = {
> +       .open = debugfs_run_open,
> +       .read = seq_read,
> +       .llseek = seq_lseek,
> +       .release = debugfs_release,
> +};
> +
>  void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>         /* First add /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite> */
> @@ -96,6 +126,9 @@ void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>         debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS, S_IFREG | 0444,
>                             suite->debugfs,
>                             suite, &debugfs_results_fops);
> +       debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN, S_IFREG | 0444,
> +                           suite->debugfs,
> +                           suite, &debugfs_run_fops);

Should anyone be able to read this? I think I agree since I am of the
opinion that people shouldn't build or load tests into a production
environment, but still I think it should be brought up.

I was actually talking to David the other day and we had the idea that
maybe KUnit should taint the kernel after tests run or after a
failure. Maybe that might communicate to a user that after running
tests the kernel shouldn't be used for production purposes.
(Obviously, I don't expect you to make that change here, the point of
anyone being able to cause tests to run just made me think of it.)
What do you think?

>  }
>
>  void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 kunit-next 3/3] kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation
  2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 3/3] kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation Alan Maguire
@ 2020-01-31  2:51   ` Brendan Higgins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2020-01-31  2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Maguire
  Cc: Greg KH, Jonathan Corbet, open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK,
	KUnit Development, open list:DOCUMENTATION,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Documentation should describe debugfs layout and semantics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> index 7cd56a1..b05c843 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> @@ -590,3 +590,22 @@ able to run one test case per invocation.
>
>  .. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture
>     dependent KUnit test.
> +
> +KUnit debugfs representation
> +============================
> +When kunit test suites are initialized, they create an associated directory
> +in /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test-suite>.  The directory contains two files
> +
> +- results: "cat results" displays results of last test run
> +- run: "cat run" runs the test suite and displays the results
> +
> +Thus to re-run all currently loaded suites and display results, we can do this:
> +
> +```
> +$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/*/run
> +```

This should be in a ".. code-block:: bash", see above in this file for
an example.

> +
> +The debugfs representation is primarily of use when kunit test suites are
> +run in a native environment, either as modules or builtin.  Having a way
> +to display results like this is valuable as otherwise results can be
> +intermixed with other events in dmesg output.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-23 18:46 [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Alan Maguire
2020-01-23 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 1/3] kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display Alan Maguire
2020-01-31  2:23   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 2/3] kunit: add "run" debugfs file to run suites, display results Alan Maguire
2020-01-31  2:43   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-01-23 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 3/3] kunit: update documentation to describe debugfs representation Alan Maguire
2020-01-31  2:51   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-01-23 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 kunit-next 0/3] kunit: add debugfs representation to show results/run tests Brendan Higgins

Linux-kselftest Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/0 linux-kselftest/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-kselftest linux-kselftest/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest \
		linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-kselftest

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git