From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kunit: tool: Add x86_64-smp architecture for SMP testing
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 10:05:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGS_qxqb+pKeKBVxzFFTss5QLSWo6nVAajwQTMB2fWbMnMHvgg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGS_qxr4vTSEtcGGFyoZibga2Q_Avp9pFD78GOA3W9o6F9RVRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 8:39 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
> > Either way works. But I wouldn't mind a sane default though, where
> > that default can be overridden with custom number of CPUs.
> >
>
> Ack.
> Let me clean up what I have for --qemu_args and send it out for discussion.
Sent out as https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220518170124.2849497-1-dlatypov@google.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-18 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 7:32 [PATCH 1/2] kunit: tool: Add x86_64-smp architecture for SMP testing David Gow
2022-05-18 7:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] kcsan: test: Add a .kunitconfig to run KCSAN tests David Gow
2022-05-18 9:21 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-19 13:08 ` David Gow
2022-05-19 13:24 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-14 20:22 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-14 21:40 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-14 23:45 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-14 23:47 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-15 6:49 ` David Gow
2022-05-18 17:12 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-06 19:53 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-05-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] kunit: tool: Add x86_64-smp architecture for SMP testing Marco Elver
2022-05-18 15:31 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-05-18 15:35 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-18 15:39 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-05-18 17:05 ` Daniel Latypov [this message]
2022-05-19 13:15 ` David Gow
2022-05-19 17:11 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-07-06 19:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-07-06 19:44 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGS_qxqb+pKeKBVxzFFTss5QLSWo6nVAajwQTMB2fWbMnMHvgg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).