From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E66C43603 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723B2227BF for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="OvFqvh8Y" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726725AbfLSB7a (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:59:30 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:33676 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726518AbfLSB73 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:59:29 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id b18so5034885otp.0 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:59:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TQOUWeuTEyIUZEEQ2jTpgmNLbvpJOv+XxTa7wYSNX3g=; b=OvFqvh8YdAzV55/KDAESLZTnpZ9T/+xm2NNdL3mtyu1mL1Ber7NA3Ncg6I6b7iipv/ 87+tC1A2QDAE4hEaupil/r5OgnOAU0+LIexdh4XDQlJ5PBsHVM39PSrtZl+WeVzBuZny 6kGu+jbsvpGz8aZPi8Ne1veypupNUpV2ZlQG9SlklJQRVHIPyapP0sLjfUYrK1yPN9g8 XAWgXdrzAfdnGfaUrLVhKsvUO0epe+i4E2S+uTxfmEQWjHer1Cua9iTKw82qgNrlfn7X ito3480sINFyoXjWIBRX75+wF64wksHkV3bEmsaHR9fp9gjzkFdjPPjPQ3k35CqUyLDa ABrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TQOUWeuTEyIUZEEQ2jTpgmNLbvpJOv+XxTa7wYSNX3g=; b=H56biEzeS3qcLmHOkMYc09UvB8l8TVmOAc00uaZI7SxxLqGih6ULYqJcJcrmsug8O3 /Zrc9qhNnrTV48YtdVB/7/qCjg8QAAdxMaAkmfx4g5zx0jayVNezw1hEw+FuxRaLZd8B kO9GtgUeOfQQOvB3xAMcUEvXebHksfY693R6zrAygeP4GOwts7fcf4WTCP1MyE4DaIbV wg1dgGAjAdv5GSN5+OX3mVqBjnYaw3dzEG1NI41XJwRpYDNLNlul++N7ujTHViuht9tR HwX1Bi1JW9zUWjwjd3mCDtzLuf0V+OxU08WRaT2oDghcLiP/1auxvbE/9uEdnD6wCJyU TVAg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXhWiRb1xRMbONZiIcP+dlwOpoueEDIULSeyusotOsHYAy0QIjD puxaWPqGup09iYXkFgdu5FWacVSwM0hp3d/FuIyHZA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1ha9qc+r4oDyIBgGQt/Isc2y55K20/dwEtbJTlEEWs6r5FLMbK9py0Kzjg45819sYbwm3CtqEmDDBcaTRo3Q= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2028:: with SMTP id n37mr6290845ota.127.1576720768716; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:59:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191217231615.164161-1-almasrymina@google.com> <20191218171254.79664a964c0c61e6054dff64@linux-foundation.org> <4d11fb25-5036-6c78-5328-10a0c14e8edc@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <4d11fb25-5036-6c78-5328-10a0c14e8edc@oracle.com> From: Mina Almasry Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:59:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter To: Mike Kravetz Cc: Andrew Morton , shuah , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , Greg Thelen , open list , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Aneesh Kumar , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Hillf Danton , Giuseppe Scrivano , Tejun Heo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:37 PM Mike Kravetz wrote: > > On 12/18/19 5:12 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:16:08 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > > >> This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify > >> functionality and show the usage. We also added cgroup-v2 support to > >> hugetlb_cgroup so that the new use cases can be extended to v2. > > > > This would make > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191216193831.540953-1-gscrivan@redhat.com > > obsolete? > > I haven't started looking at this series yet. However, since Mina was > involved in the discussion of that patch (hugetlb controller for cgroups v2) > my assumption is that this patch would simply build on that v2 support? > Seems like the above patch would be a prereq for this series. > > Mina, are those assumptions correct and perhaps this is an old/obsolete > comment? Does this series apply 'on top' of the above patch? That patch > is already in Andrew's tree. Gah, I just forgot to update this commit message. This patch series is indeed on top of Giuseppe's v2 support and doesn't conflict or duplicate that functionality. Sorry for the confusion. I'll fix the commit message in the next iteration. > -- > Mike Kravetz