From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD4DC433E2 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05DD21D6C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HUNvSNOC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725780AbgIKT7L (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:59:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48254 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725776AbgIKT7K (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:59:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC54C061573; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id n13so11283959edo.10; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:59:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B2fvDataPFDcqtRjmyzwIGz+W24egsQT7RsA21OM+aw=; b=HUNvSNOCsAYMaMX6zn28qYgInmlDzu+yDJ7owLavD6xitvNjd6zk8e4l9dv0y3dMK4 t5cBve4IXwgxailATJEBiqKerVMOGOvTBwH4Eu0y4D5JGUA12kVENN/Rm0bZbVi4PzBf /sLSP9NqN6Vr673cNVgytfCc5OePhjFxDZ1JQlTcPh/mjMU8fKpdS/2oYkQUdGW3oQQI prbGOOURjVSRMQXivNb/plEk4P5GZ/XXLHTDj/OkZzx5Be8z473wsDRJzopin+MnicXI oxv7Nm8BUBDBU3NYUbnJ6qUSxCjSGai+I1olA1qqRQ5C7jTzIjiJ36/tlGp6irXjbj33 XF0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B2fvDataPFDcqtRjmyzwIGz+W24egsQT7RsA21OM+aw=; b=r/ED/9HowdS640Svys1CtaCGY3CnJoItLI3kOUTUsjWHIeGG3b1UTiHIsk30egBZWL JyChLqRSaJZIVOgWD66466ZqQTe99JFb7c0TKDq/qOI0XYqMXOtZKw+5KcL+e9Qff8r6 9Vd2uorUZHui7sjbRy8yNiQVVlk0MbQpj3QauCUTcajD+4fM4HuqM9U79veBM+SSkLNC v8FCW/stj4VmmfLAUeSsNpf4erAuRRE9206P5sQ6rfRAYUyKKPwQsSVVwYjZsK4JURHk NYbC7dwSUqg8LioOFg6teHZvlOhomYmvz/HgOpGhGjm3cphRFemjt4K7jOBNhy5OHmLU B+fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531TQaQe/BvD+VQK7732iK0SwTgVFDerYJKxyu006w0doXZlVnuA 24IWYFtyD/dH6Ngx98pnkEDmCz0I3+hQW69CCgguXTPu X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTXXgJ/g+/XHWAyZTrQ3F0tE6i12N0C82M8zOxAL/IjsufylXhuRysYAjE1y/YpRKS8qx2oJQIPMSpawJWxJI= X-Received: by 2002:a50:9355:: with SMTP id n21mr4015157eda.237.1599854348113; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:59:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200719021654.25922-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> <202009111229.4A853F0@keescook> In-Reply-To: <202009111229.4A853F0@keescook> From: Max Filippov Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:58:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xtensa: add seccomp support To: Kees Cook Cc: "open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)" , Chris Zankel , LKML , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:38 PM Kees Cook wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:16:51PM -0700, Max Filippov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > this series adds support for seccomp filter on xtensa and updates > > selftests/seccomp. > > Hi! > > Firstly, thanks for adding seccomp support! :) I would, however, ask > that you CC maintainers on these kinds of changes for feedback. I was > surprised to find the changes in the seccomp selftests today in Linus's > tree. I didn't seem to get CCed on this series, even though > get_maintainers shows this: > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-selftests-seccomp-add-xtensa-support.mbox > Kees Cook (supporter:SECURE COMPUTING) > Andy Lutomirski (reviewer:SECURE COMPUTING) > Will Drewry (reviewer:SECURE COMPUTING) > Shuah Khan (maintainer:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK) > ... Sorry about that. Looks like I've filtered out too much of the cc: list. I'll fix my workflow. > Regardless, I'm still glad to have more arch support! :) I'll send a > follow-up patch to refactor a bit of the selftest. -- Thanks. -- Max